Implementing a group-based online mental well-being program for women living with and beyond breast cancer - A mixed methods study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Natalie Tuckey, Joep van Agteren, Anna Chur-Hansen, Kathina Ali, Daniel B Fassnacht, Lisa Beatty, Monique Bareham, Hannah Wardill, Matthew Iasiello
{"title":"Implementing a group-based online mental well-being program for women living with and beyond breast cancer - A mixed methods study.","authors":"Natalie Tuckey, Joep van Agteren, Anna Chur-Hansen, Kathina Ali, Daniel B Fassnacht, Lisa Beatty, Monique Bareham, Hannah Wardill, Matthew Iasiello","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is a gap in available mental well-being services in Australia for women diagnosed with breast cancer. This pilot mixed-methods uncontrolled study aimed to assess the feasibility of an online mental health and well-being intervention, the Be Well Plan (BWP), which enables participants to create a personalized, flexible well-being strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women diagnosed with stages I-IV breast cancer were recruited into 4 asynchronous groups to participate in the BWP, a 5-week facilitator-led group-based mental health and well-being program. Psychological measures used at baseline and post-intervention included: the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale, Brief Resilience Scale, Self-compassion Scale, 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, 7-item General Anxiety Disorder scale, and EORC QLQ-C30. Multivariate analysis of variance and effect sizes were calculated on pre- and post-psychological measures, followed by qualitative content analysis on post-completion interviews with participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen women (mean age 45.7, standard deviation = 7.74) were included in the study. Large effect sizes were reported for mental well-being, depressive symptoms, and anxiety (partial ω<sup>2 </sup>= 0.28, 0.21, and 0.20, respectively)<sub>.</sub> Self-compassion, resilience, and quality of life results were not statistically significant. Qualitative content analysis provided insight into experiences with Program Delivery Experience, Application of the BWP, Mental Health Improvements, Supporter Involvement, Adopted Interventions, and Recruitment. Participants reported benefits in mindfulness, grounding techniques, and physical activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BWP has the potential to be an effective intervention to support the mental health and well-being of breast cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>This study highlights flexible interventions that accommodate the diverse needs of breast cancer survivors to improve mental well-being and alleviate psychological distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There is a gap in available mental well-being services in Australia for women diagnosed with breast cancer. This pilot mixed-methods uncontrolled study aimed to assess the feasibility of an online mental health and well-being intervention, the Be Well Plan (BWP), which enables participants to create a personalized, flexible well-being strategy.

Methods: Women diagnosed with stages I-IV breast cancer were recruited into 4 asynchronous groups to participate in the BWP, a 5-week facilitator-led group-based mental health and well-being program. Psychological measures used at baseline and post-intervention included: the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale, Brief Resilience Scale, Self-compassion Scale, 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, 7-item General Anxiety Disorder scale, and EORC QLQ-C30. Multivariate analysis of variance and effect sizes were calculated on pre- and post-psychological measures, followed by qualitative content analysis on post-completion interviews with participants.

Results: Nineteen women (mean age 45.7, standard deviation = 7.74) were included in the study. Large effect sizes were reported for mental well-being, depressive symptoms, and anxiety (partial ω= 0.28, 0.21, and 0.20, respectively). Self-compassion, resilience, and quality of life results were not statistically significant. Qualitative content analysis provided insight into experiences with Program Delivery Experience, Application of the BWP, Mental Health Improvements, Supporter Involvement, Adopted Interventions, and Recruitment. Participants reported benefits in mindfulness, grounding techniques, and physical activities.

Conclusion: The BWP has the potential to be an effective intervention to support the mental health and well-being of breast cancer survivors.

Implications for cancer survivors: This study highlights flexible interventions that accommodate the diverse needs of breast cancer survivors to improve mental well-being and alleviate psychological distress.

Abstract Image

为患有乳腺癌及乳腺癌后妇女实施基于小组的在线心理健康计划--一项混合方法研究。
目的:在澳大利亚,针对确诊患有乳腺癌的女性提供的心理健康服务存在缺口。这项试验性混合方法非对照研究旨在评估在线心理健康和幸福干预措施 "幸福计划"(BWP)的可行性,该计划使参与者能够制定个性化、灵活的幸福策略:方法:被诊断为 I-IV 期乳腺癌的妇女被招募到 4 个异步小组,参加为期 5 周的 BWP,这是一项由促进者主导的以小组为基础的心理健康和幸福计划。基线和干预后使用的心理测量包括:华威爱丁堡心理健康量表、简易复原力量表、自怜量表、9项患者健康问卷、7项一般焦虑症量表和EORC QLQ-C30。计算了前后心理测量的多变量方差分析和效应大小,然后对参与者完成后的访谈进行了定性内容分析:19名女性(平均年龄45.7岁,标准差=7.74)参与了研究。据报告,心理健康、抑郁症状和焦虑的效应大小较大(部分ω2 分别为 0.28、0.21 和 0.20)。自我同情、复原力和生活质量的结果在统计学上并不显著。定性内容分析有助于深入了解项目实施经验、BWP 的应用、心理健康改善、支持者参与、采用的干预措施和招募等方面的经验。参与者表示在正念、接地技术和体育活动方面受益匪浅:结论:BWP 有可能成为支持乳腺癌幸存者心理健康和幸福的有效干预措施:本研究强调了灵活的干预措施,可满足乳腺癌幸存者的不同需求,从而改善其心理健康并减轻其心理压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信