CEM immediately after contrast-enhanced CT: a one-step staging of breast cancer.

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Antonietta Ancona, Michele Telegrafo, Rita Roberta Fella, Donato Iamele, Sebastiano Cantore, Marco Moschetta
{"title":"CEM immediately after contrast-enhanced CT: a one-step staging of breast cancer.","authors":"Antonietta Ancona, Michele Telegrafo, Rita Roberta Fella, Donato Iamele, Sebastiano Cantore, Marco Moschetta","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00440-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a promising technique. We evaluated the diagnostic potential of CEM performed immediately after contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty patients with breast cancer underwent first CE-CT and then CEM without additional contrast material injection. Two independent radiologists evaluated CEM images. The sensitivity of CEM for detecting index and additional malignant lesions was compared with that of mammography/ultrasonography by the McNemar test, using histopathology as a reference standard. Interobserver agreement for detection of malignant lesions, for classifying index tumors, and for evaluating index tumor size and extent was assessed using Cohen κ. Pearson correlation was used for correlating index tumor size/extent at CEM or mammography/ultrasonography with histopathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 50 patients, 30 (60%) had unifocal disease while 20 (40%) had multicentric or multifocal disease; 5 of 20 patients with multicentric disease (25%) had bilateral involvement, for a total of 78 malignant lesions, including 72 (92%) invasive ductal and 6 (8%) invasive lobular carcinomas. Sensitivity was 63/78 (81%, 95% confidence interval 70.27-88.82) for unenhanced breast imaging and 78/78 (100%, 95.38-100) for CEM (p < 0.001). The interobserver agreement for overall detection of malignant lesions, for classifying index tumor, and for evaluating index tumor size/extent were 0.94, 0.95, and 0.86 κ, respectively. For index tumor size/extent, correlation coefficients as compared with histological specimens were 0.50 for mammography/ultrasonography and 0.75 for CEM (p ≤ 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CEM acquired immediately after CE-CT without injection of additional contrast material showed a good performance for local staging of breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>When the CEM suite is near to the CE-CT acquisition room, CEM acquired immediately after, without injection of additional contrast material, could represent a way for local staging of breast cancer to be explored in larger prospective studies.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>• CEM represents a new accurate tool in the field of breast imaging. • An intravenous injection of iodine-based contrast material is required for breast gland evaluation. • CEM after CE-CT could provide a one-stop tool for breast cancer staging.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"8 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10982147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00440-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a promising technique. We evaluated the diagnostic potential of CEM performed immediately after contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT).

Methods: Fifty patients with breast cancer underwent first CE-CT and then CEM without additional contrast material injection. Two independent radiologists evaluated CEM images. The sensitivity of CEM for detecting index and additional malignant lesions was compared with that of mammography/ultrasonography by the McNemar test, using histopathology as a reference standard. Interobserver agreement for detection of malignant lesions, for classifying index tumors, and for evaluating index tumor size and extent was assessed using Cohen κ. Pearson correlation was used for correlating index tumor size/extent at CEM or mammography/ultrasonography with histopathology.

Results: Of the 50 patients, 30 (60%) had unifocal disease while 20 (40%) had multicentric or multifocal disease; 5 of 20 patients with multicentric disease (25%) had bilateral involvement, for a total of 78 malignant lesions, including 72 (92%) invasive ductal and 6 (8%) invasive lobular carcinomas. Sensitivity was 63/78 (81%, 95% confidence interval 70.27-88.82) for unenhanced breast imaging and 78/78 (100%, 95.38-100) for CEM (p < 0.001). The interobserver agreement for overall detection of malignant lesions, for classifying index tumor, and for evaluating index tumor size/extent were 0.94, 0.95, and 0.86 κ, respectively. For index tumor size/extent, correlation coefficients as compared with histological specimens were 0.50 for mammography/ultrasonography and 0.75 for CEM (p ≤ 0.010).

Conclusions: CEM acquired immediately after CE-CT without injection of additional contrast material showed a good performance for local staging of breast cancer.

Relevance statement: When the CEM suite is near to the CE-CT acquisition room, CEM acquired immediately after, without injection of additional contrast material, could represent a way for local staging of breast cancer to be explored in larger prospective studies.

Key points: • CEM represents a new accurate tool in the field of breast imaging. • An intravenous injection of iodine-based contrast material is required for breast gland evaluation. • CEM after CE-CT could provide a one-stop tool for breast cancer staging.

造影剂增强 CT 后立即进行 CEM:乳腺癌的一步分期。
背景:对比增强乳腺X线摄影(CEM)是一项前景广阔的技术。我们评估了造影剂增强计算机断层扫描(CE-CT)后立即进行 CEM 的诊断潜力:方法:50 名乳腺癌患者首先接受了 CE-CT,然后接受了 CEM,但未注射额外的造影剂。两名独立的放射科医生对 CEM 图像进行了评估。以组织病理学为参考标准,通过 McNemar 检验比较了 CEM 与乳腺 X 线造影术/超声波造影术检测指数病灶和额外恶性病灶的灵敏度。在检测恶性病变、对指数肿瘤进行分类以及评估指数肿瘤的大小和范围时,使用 Cohen κ 来评估观察者之间的一致性。皮尔逊相关性用于将 CEM 或乳腺 X 线摄影/超声波检查的指标肿瘤大小/范围与组织病理学相关联:50名患者中,30人(60%)为单灶性疾病,20人(40%)为多中心或多灶性疾病;20名多中心疾病患者中有5人(25%)为双侧受累,共78例恶性病变,包括72例(92%)浸润性导管癌和6例(8%)浸润性小叶癌。未增强乳腺成像的灵敏度为 63/78(81%,95% 置信区间为 70.27-88.82),而 CEM 的灵敏度为 78/78(100%,95.38-100)(P 结论:CEM 的灵敏度为 100%,95% 置信区间为 70.27-88.82):在 CE-CT 之后立即获得的 CEM 无需注射额外的造影剂,在乳腺癌的局部分期方面表现良好:当CEM室靠近CE-CT采集室时,在CE-CT采集后立即进行CEM采集,无需注射额外的造影剂,可作为乳腺癌局部分期的一种方法,在更大规模的前瞻性研究中进行探索:- 要点:CEM 是乳腺成像领域的一种新的精确工具。- 要点:CEM 是乳腺成像领域新的精确工具。- CE-CT 后的 CEM 可为乳腺癌分期提供一站式工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信