Outcome of patients with traumatic cranial nerve palsy admitted to a university hospital in Nepal.

Q2 Medicine
Khusbu Kumari, Naveen Gautam, Monika Parajuli, Shreejana Singh, Amit Pradhananga, Gopal Sedai, Sushil Shilpakar, Mohan Raj Sharma
{"title":"Outcome of patients with traumatic cranial nerve palsy admitted to a university hospital in Nepal.","authors":"Khusbu Kumari, Naveen Gautam, Monika Parajuli, Shreejana Singh, Amit Pradhananga, Gopal Sedai, Sushil Shilpakar, Mohan Raj Sharma","doi":"10.1186/s41016-024-00361-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cranial nerve palsy (CNP) is a common complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Despite a high incidence of TBI in Nepal (382 per 100,000), literature on the specific management and outcome of CNP is lacking. This study aimed to examine the outcomes of TBI patients involving single versus multiple CNP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of 170 consecutive TBI patients admitted to the tertiary neurosurgical center in Nepal between April 2020 and April 2022 was conducted. Demographic, clinical, and etiological characteristics; imaging findings; and management strategies were recorded, compared, and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) was used to measure the outcomes in two groups of patients (single and multiple CNP) at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 250 eligible patients, 80 were excluded and CNP was noted in 29 (17.1%) of the remaining 170. The median age was 34.9 years, and falls (60.6%) were the most common cause of trauma. TBI severity was categorized based on GCS: mild (82.4%), moderate (15.9%), and severe (1.8%). Cranial nerve involvement was seen in 29 (17.05%) patients: single cranial nerve involvement in 26 (89.65%) and multiple nerve involvement in 3 (10.34%). The most common isolated cranial nerve involved was the oculomotor nerve (37.9%). CT findings revealed a maximum of skull fractures with no significant association between CNP and CT findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CNP is a common consequence of TBI with the most common etiology being falls followed by RTA. Single CNP was more common than multiple CNP with no significant difference in the outcome in the 3-month GOSE score. Further research is needed to determine the burden of traumatic CNP and establish specific management guidelines for different types of CNP.</p>","PeriodicalId":36700,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Neurosurgical Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10983658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Neurosurgical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-024-00361-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cranial nerve palsy (CNP) is a common complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Despite a high incidence of TBI in Nepal (382 per 100,000), literature on the specific management and outcome of CNP is lacking. This study aimed to examine the outcomes of TBI patients involving single versus multiple CNP.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of 170 consecutive TBI patients admitted to the tertiary neurosurgical center in Nepal between April 2020 and April 2022 was conducted. Demographic, clinical, and etiological characteristics; imaging findings; and management strategies were recorded, compared, and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) was used to measure the outcomes in two groups of patients (single and multiple CNP) at 3 months.

Results: Out of 250 eligible patients, 80 were excluded and CNP was noted in 29 (17.1%) of the remaining 170. The median age was 34.9 years, and falls (60.6%) were the most common cause of trauma. TBI severity was categorized based on GCS: mild (82.4%), moderate (15.9%), and severe (1.8%). Cranial nerve involvement was seen in 29 (17.05%) patients: single cranial nerve involvement in 26 (89.65%) and multiple nerve involvement in 3 (10.34%). The most common isolated cranial nerve involved was the oculomotor nerve (37.9%). CT findings revealed a maximum of skull fractures with no significant association between CNP and CT findings.

Conclusions: CNP is a common consequence of TBI with the most common etiology being falls followed by RTA. Single CNP was more common than multiple CNP with no significant difference in the outcome in the 3-month GOSE score. Further research is needed to determine the burden of traumatic CNP and establish specific management guidelines for different types of CNP.

尼泊尔一所大学医院收治的外伤性颅神经麻痹患者的治疗效果。
背景:颅神经麻痹(CNP)是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的常见并发症。尽管尼泊尔的创伤性脑损伤发病率很高(每十万人中有 382 人),但有关颅神经麻痹的具体治疗方法和结果的文献却很缺乏。本研究旨在探讨创伤性脑损伤患者单发与多发 CNP 的治疗效果:方法:对2020年4月至2022年4月期间尼泊尔三级神经外科中心收治的170例连续创伤性脑损伤患者进行回顾性病历审查。采用描述性统计方法记录、比较和分析了人口统计学、临床和病因学特征、影像学检查结果和管理策略。格拉斯哥结果量表扩展版(GOSE)用于测量两组患者(单发和多发 CNP)3 个月后的结果:在 250 名符合条件的患者中,有 80 人被排除在外,剩下的 170 人中有 29 人(17.1%)发现有 CNP。中位年龄为 34.9 岁,跌倒(60.6%)是最常见的创伤原因。创伤性脑损伤的严重程度根据 GCS 进行分类:轻度(82.4%)、中度(15.9%)和重度(1.8%)。29例(17.05%)患者的颅神经受累:26例(89.65%)为单颅神经受累,3例(10.34%)为多颅神经受累。最常见的单独受累颅神经是眼球运动神经(37.9%)。CT结果显示颅骨骨折最多,而CNP与CT结果之间无明显关联:结论:CNP 是创伤性脑损伤的常见后果,最常见的病因是跌倒,其次是 RTA。单发 CNP 比多发 CNP 更为常见,但 3 个月的 GOSE 评分结果无明显差异。需要进一步开展研究,以确定创伤性 CNP 的负担,并为不同类型的 CNP 制定具体的管理指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
224
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信