Adjunctive cariprazine for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CNS Spectrums Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1017/S1092852924000178
Hartej Gill, David C J Chen-Li, Sipan Haikazian, Sam Seyedin, Roger S McIntyre, Rodrigo B Mansur, Joshua D DiVincenzo, Lee Phan, Joshua D Rosenblat
{"title":"Adjunctive cariprazine for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Hartej Gill, David C J Chen-Li, Sipan Haikazian, Sam Seyedin, Roger S McIntyre, Rodrigo B Mansur, Joshua D DiVincenzo, Lee Phan, Joshua D Rosenblat","doi":"10.1017/S1092852924000178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Converging evidence has suggested that treatment augmentation with a second-generation atypical antipsychotic (SGA) may improve treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients after an incomplete response to a first-line antidepressant. Cariprazine is a recently approved SGA for MDD augmentation. Herein, we evaluate both continuous (ie, change in depressive symptom severity scores over time) and categorical (ie, remission and response rates) outcomes. Following a full-text review, four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in our meta-analysis, while five studies were included for a qualitative review. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for all included randomized controlled studies to determine the relative response and remission rates of cariprazine compared to placebo augmentation. The RR for all-cause dropout was also determined as a proxy for overall acceptability. Two studies found a statistically significant treatment response using cariprazine augmentation. One study observed depressive symptom remission for cariprazine compared to placebo. Our random-effects model revealed moderate antidepressant effects of cariprazine, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores of -1.79 (95% CI): -2.89, -0.69). Our pooled response RR and remission RR were calculated as 1.21 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.39, <i>P</i>=0.008) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.17, <i>P</i>=0.91), respectively. The RR for response was statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05). However, the RR for remission was not statistically significant. The findings from our meta-analysis include a variable magnitude of effects. Evidence suggests cariprazine may be an effective treatment for MDD; however, further results are needed to clarify this relation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10505,"journal":{"name":"CNS Spectrums","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Spectrums","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852924000178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Converging evidence has suggested that treatment augmentation with a second-generation atypical antipsychotic (SGA) may improve treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients after an incomplete response to a first-line antidepressant. Cariprazine is a recently approved SGA for MDD augmentation. Herein, we evaluate both continuous (ie, change in depressive symptom severity scores over time) and categorical (ie, remission and response rates) outcomes. Following a full-text review, four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in our meta-analysis, while five studies were included for a qualitative review. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for all included randomized controlled studies to determine the relative response and remission rates of cariprazine compared to placebo augmentation. The RR for all-cause dropout was also determined as a proxy for overall acceptability. Two studies found a statistically significant treatment response using cariprazine augmentation. One study observed depressive symptom remission for cariprazine compared to placebo. Our random-effects model revealed moderate antidepressant effects of cariprazine, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores of -1.79 (95% CI): -2.89, -0.69). Our pooled response RR and remission RR were calculated as 1.21 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.39, P=0.008) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.17, P=0.91), respectively. The RR for response was statistically significant (P<0.05). However, the RR for remission was not statistically significant. The findings from our meta-analysis include a variable magnitude of effects. Evidence suggests cariprazine may be an effective treatment for MDD; however, further results are needed to clarify this relation.

辅助治疗重度抑郁症的卡里普嗪:系统回顾与元分析》。
越来越多的证据表明,对于对一线抗抑郁药反应不完全的重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者,使用第二代非典型抗精神病药(SGA)进行增效治疗可改善治疗效果。卡利普嗪是最近获批用于增强 MDD 治疗的 SGA。在此,我们对连续性结果(即抑郁症状严重程度评分随时间的变化)和分类结果(即缓解率和应答率)进行了评估。在进行全文综述后,四项随机对照试验(RCT)被纳入我们的荟萃分析,五项研究被纳入定性综述。我们计算了所有纳入的随机对照研究的风险比(RR),以确定卡哌嗪与安慰剂增强疗法相比的相对应答率和缓解率。此外,还确定了全因辍学的风险比,作为总体可接受性的替代指标。有两项研究发现,使用卡哌嗪增效剂会产生具有统计学意义的治疗反应。一项研究观察到,与安慰剂相比,卡哌嗪的抑郁症状有所缓解。我们的随机效应模型显示,卡哌嗪具有中等程度的抗抑郁效果,蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)评分的标准化平均差(SMD)为-1.79(95% CI):-2.89, -0.69)。经计算,我们的汇总应答RR和缓解RR分别为1.21(95% CI:1.05,1.39,P=0.008)和0.99(95% CI:0.84,1.17,P=0.91)。应答的 RR 具有统计学意义(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CNS Spectrums
CNS Spectrums 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
239
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CNS Spectrums covers all aspects of the clinical neurosciences, neurotherapeutics, and neuropsychopharmacology, particularly those pertinent to the clinician and clinical investigator. The journal features focused, in-depth reviews, perspectives, and original research articles. New therapeutics of all types in psychiatry, mental health, and neurology are emphasized, especially first in man studies, proof of concept studies, and translational basic neuroscience studies. Subject coverage spans the full spectrum of neuropsychiatry, focusing on those crossing traditional boundaries between neurology and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信