A Systematic Review of the Evaluation of Social Validity in Experimental Examinations of Tier 2 Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions

IF 1.4 3区心理学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions Pub Date : 2024-03-30 DOI:10.1177/10983007241230596

Lydia A. Beahm, Bryan G. Cook, Alan McLucas, Kaci Ellis, Catherine P. Bradshaw

{"title":"A Systematic Review of the Evaluation of Social Validity in Experimental Examinations of Tier 2 Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions","authors":"Lydia A. Beahm, Bryan G. Cook, Alan McLucas, Kaci Ellis, Catherine P. Bradshaw","doi":"10.1177/10983007241230596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Positive behavior interventions and supports (PBIS) is a three-tiered framework shown to improve student behavioral outcomes. There has been considerable investment in scaling up Tier 1 PBIS but less focus on scaling Tier 2 supports. Having greater insight into teachers,’ students,’ and families’ perceptions regarding the social validity of Tier 2 interventions may further facilitate the scale-up of this more resource-intensive level of the multitiered model. The primary objective of this systematic literature review was to evaluate the social validity of Tier 2 interventions in 48 experimental studies, 65% of which systematically assessed social validity. Almost all studies reporting social validity data surveyed student participants and teachers (94%). Results indicated teachers and students primarily reported positive perceptions regarding Tier 2 interventions, although some teachers expressed concerns with effectiveness of the outcomes. Findings provide insights that can help promote the scale-up and broader dissemination of Tier 2 supports.","PeriodicalId":47652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007241230596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Positive behavior interventions and supports (PBIS) is a three-tiered framework shown to improve student behavioral outcomes. There has been considerable investment in scaling up Tier 1 PBIS but less focus on scaling Tier 2 supports. Having greater insight into teachers,’ students,’ and families’ perceptions regarding the social validity of Tier 2 interventions may further facilitate the scale-up of this more resource-intensive level of the multitiered model. The primary objective of this systematic literature review was to evaluate the social validity of Tier 2 interventions in 48 experimental studies, 65% of which systematically assessed social validity. Almost all studies reporting social validity data surveyed student participants and teachers (94%). Results indicated teachers and students primarily reported positive perceptions regarding Tier 2 interventions, although some teachers expressed concerns with effectiveness of the outcomes. Findings provide insights that can help promote the scale-up and broader dissemination of Tier 2 supports.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对第二级全校积极行为干预实验中社会有效性评估的系统回顾

积极行为干预与支持（PBIS）是一个三层框架，已证明能改善学生的行为结果。在推广 PBIS 第一层方面投入了大量资金，但对推广第二层支持的关注较少。更深入地了解教师、学生和家庭对第二级干预措施社会有效性的看法，可能会进一步促进这一资源密集型多级模式的推广。本系统文献综述的主要目的是评估 48 项实验研究中第二层干预措施的社会有效性，其中 65% 的研究对社会有效性进行了系统评估。几乎所有报告社会有效性数据的研究都对学生参与者和教师进行了调查（94%）。结果表明，教师和学生主要对第二层干预措施持积极看法，但也有一些教师对干预结果的有效性表示担忧。研究结果提供的见解有助于促进第二层支持措施的推广和普及。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions Multiple-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： ...offers sound, research-based principles of positive behavior support for use in school, home and community settings with people with challenges in behavioral adaptation. Regular features include empirical research; discussion, literature reviews, and conceptual papers; programs, practices, and innovations; forum; and media reviews.