Frontal P300 asymmetry and congruence judgment: Retroactive switching is impaired during school day mornings in female adolescents

Gabriel E. Byczynski , Amedeo D'Angiulli
{"title":"Frontal P300 asymmetry and congruence judgment: Retroactive switching is impaired during school day mornings in female adolescents","authors":"Gabriel E. Byczynski ,&nbsp;Amedeo D'Angiulli","doi":"10.1016/j.crneur.2024.100128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Investigating frontal EEG asymmetry as a possible biomarker of cognitive control abilities is especially important in ecological contexts such as school and work. We used a novel approach combining judgment performance and hemispheric frontal event-related potential (ERP) P300 asymmetry (fP3As) to evaluate aspects of cognitive control (i.e., repetition and switching) in adolescent females over a two-week ordinary school period. While undergoing electroencephalographic recording, students performed a word-colour “Stroop-like” congruence judgment task during morning and afternoon sessions, on Mondays and Wednesdays. Proportion of incongruence and congruence trials was 75% and 25%, respectively. ERP analysis revealed larger “novelty” right hemispheric fP3As amplitude for infrequent congruence but equivalent or significantly smaller than left hemispheric fP3As amplitude for frequent incongruence. RTs increased with extent of right fP3As shift. Behaviorally, repeat trial pairs (i.e., congruent followed by congruent, incongruent followed by incongruent) generally did not differ by time or day and were associated with near-ceiling accuracy. In contrast, switch trial pairs (i.e., congruent followed by incongruent, incongruent followed by congruent) in the afternoon were slower and associated with lower accuracy at the expected 75% criterion rate (i.e., judging incongruence by default), dropping significantly below 75% in the mornings. Crucially, compared to afternoon, morning fP3As patterns did not change adaptively with switch trial pairs. Although retroactive switching during congruence judgment was affected at all testing times, we conclude it was most impaired in the mornings of both early and mid school weeks, supporting misalignment between adolescent circadian cycle and school start time. We discuss some implications for optimal learning of adolescents at school.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72752,"journal":{"name":"Current research in neurobiology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665945X24000056/pdfft?md5=180e96708b7e20b2e258a28bf0db7083&pid=1-s2.0-S2665945X24000056-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665945X24000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investigating frontal EEG asymmetry as a possible biomarker of cognitive control abilities is especially important in ecological contexts such as school and work. We used a novel approach combining judgment performance and hemispheric frontal event-related potential (ERP) P300 asymmetry (fP3As) to evaluate aspects of cognitive control (i.e., repetition and switching) in adolescent females over a two-week ordinary school period. While undergoing electroencephalographic recording, students performed a word-colour “Stroop-like” congruence judgment task during morning and afternoon sessions, on Mondays and Wednesdays. Proportion of incongruence and congruence trials was 75% and 25%, respectively. ERP analysis revealed larger “novelty” right hemispheric fP3As amplitude for infrequent congruence but equivalent or significantly smaller than left hemispheric fP3As amplitude for frequent incongruence. RTs increased with extent of right fP3As shift. Behaviorally, repeat trial pairs (i.e., congruent followed by congruent, incongruent followed by incongruent) generally did not differ by time or day and were associated with near-ceiling accuracy. In contrast, switch trial pairs (i.e., congruent followed by incongruent, incongruent followed by congruent) in the afternoon were slower and associated with lower accuracy at the expected 75% criterion rate (i.e., judging incongruence by default), dropping significantly below 75% in the mornings. Crucially, compared to afternoon, morning fP3As patterns did not change adaptively with switch trial pairs. Although retroactive switching during congruence judgment was affected at all testing times, we conclude it was most impaired in the mornings of both early and mid school weeks, supporting misalignment between adolescent circadian cycle and school start time. We discuss some implications for optimal learning of adolescents at school.

Abstract Image

额叶 P300 不对称与一致性判断:女性青少年在上学日上午的逆向转换能力受损
在学校和工作等生态环境中,将额叶脑电图不对称作为认知控制能力的一种可能的生物标记进行研究尤为重要。我们采用了一种结合判断表现和半球额叶事件相关电位(ERP)P300不对称性(fP3As)的新方法,来评估青少年女性在为期两周的普通学校学习期间的认知控制能力(即重复和转换)。在接受脑电图记录的同时,学生们在每周一和周三的上午和下午时段进行了一项类似于 "Stroop "的词色一致性判断任务。不一致和一致试验的比例分别为 75% 和 25%。ERP分析表明,在不经常出现一致性时,"新奇 "的右半球fP3As振幅较大,但在经常出现不一致性时,右半球fP3As振幅与左半球fP3As振幅相当或明显小于左半球fP3As振幅。RT 随右侧 fP3As 转移程度的增加而增加。从行为上看,重复试验对(即先相同后相同,先不一致后不一致)一般没有时间或日期上的差异,并且与接近上限的准确性相关。相反,下午的转换试验对(即先一致后不一致,先不一致后一致)速度较慢,与预期的 75% 标准率(即默认判断不一致)的准确率较低有关,上午的准确率明显低于 75%。重要的是,与下午相比,上午的 fP3As 模式并没有随着转换试验对的出现而发生适应性变化。虽然在所有测试时间段,一致性判断过程中的追溯性转换都会受到影响,但我们得出的结论是,在学校周初和周中的上午,追溯性转换受到的影响最大,这也证明了青少年昼夜节律周期与学校开学时间之间的错位。我们讨论了青少年在校最佳学习的一些影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信