Low-velocity penetrating brain injury: a review of the literature and illustrative case.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Brain injury Pub Date : 2024-07-02 Epub Date: 2024-03-31 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2024.2336067
Richard Cook, Laura Zima, Jawad Khazaal, John Williams
{"title":"Low-velocity penetrating brain injury: a review of the literature and illustrative case.","authors":"Richard Cook, Laura Zima, Jawad Khazaal, John Williams","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2336067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low-velocity penetrating brain injury (LVPBI) is a class of brain injury where a foreign object violates the skull and damages the brain. Such injuries are rare and consequently understudied.</p><p><strong>Case: </strong>As such, we report an illustrative case of a 29-year-old female with a dense, plastic spike penetrating her right orbit and into her midbrain. After assessment with a CT scan and angiography, the object was removed with careful attention to possible vascular injury. The patient had an uncomplicated post-operative course and received antibiotic and antiepileptic prophylaxis. She was discharged on post-operative day 5, experiencing only mild left-sided weakness.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Common concerns regarding LVPBI include infection, post-traumatic epilepsy, and vascular injury. A review of published LVPBI cases over the past 20 years demonstrated that most cases (55.2%) are due to accidents. Of patients undergoing surgery, 43.4% underwent a craniotomy, and 22.8% underwent a craniectomy. Despite the grave nature of LVPBI, only 13.5% of the patients died. Additionally, 6.5% of patients developed an infection over their clinical course.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In all, more reported cases further paint a picture of the current state of management and outcomes regarding LVPBI, paving the way for more cohesive guidelines to ensure the best possible patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"668-674"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2336067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Low-velocity penetrating brain injury (LVPBI) is a class of brain injury where a foreign object violates the skull and damages the brain. Such injuries are rare and consequently understudied.

Case: As such, we report an illustrative case of a 29-year-old female with a dense, plastic spike penetrating her right orbit and into her midbrain. After assessment with a CT scan and angiography, the object was removed with careful attention to possible vascular injury. The patient had an uncomplicated post-operative course and received antibiotic and antiepileptic prophylaxis. She was discharged on post-operative day 5, experiencing only mild left-sided weakness.

Discussion: Common concerns regarding LVPBI include infection, post-traumatic epilepsy, and vascular injury. A review of published LVPBI cases over the past 20 years demonstrated that most cases (55.2%) are due to accidents. Of patients undergoing surgery, 43.4% underwent a craniotomy, and 22.8% underwent a craniectomy. Despite the grave nature of LVPBI, only 13.5% of the patients died. Additionally, 6.5% of patients developed an infection over their clinical course.

Conclusion: In all, more reported cases further paint a picture of the current state of management and outcomes regarding LVPBI, paving the way for more cohesive guidelines to ensure the best possible patient outcomes.

低速穿透性脑损伤:文献综述和案例说明。
简介低速穿透性脑损伤(LVPBI)是一类外来物体侵犯颅骨并损伤大脑的脑损伤。此类损伤非常罕见,因此研究不足:因此,我们报告了一个 29 岁女性的典型病例,她的右眼眶被一根致密的塑料尖刺穿透并进入中脑。经过 CT 扫描和血管造影评估后,我们小心翼翼地将该物体取出,并注意可能造成的血管损伤。患者术后情况并不复杂,接受了抗生素和抗癫痫预防治疗。她在术后第 5 天出院,仅有轻微的左侧肢体无力:讨论:LVPBI的常见问题包括感染、创伤后癫痫和血管损伤。对过去20年发表的LVPBI病例进行回顾后发现,大多数病例(55.2%)是由意外事故引起的。在接受手术的患者中,43.4%接受了开颅手术,22.8%接受了颅骨切除术。尽管 LVPBI 性质严重,但只有 13.5% 的患者死亡。此外,6.5%的患者在临床过程中发生了感染:总之,更多的报告病例进一步描绘了LVPBI的管理现状和结果,为制定更有凝聚力的指南铺平了道路,以确保患者获得最佳治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信