Chinese collaborative study of survival analysis in 980 patients with AL amyloidosis

Medicine Advances Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1002/med4.53
Hokhim Yau, Liye Zhong, Sheng Li, Weiting He, Yaxi Zhu, Pengjun Liao, Jianteng Xie, Hongwen Fei, Liwen Li, Hui Liu, Jie Li, Wenjian Wang
{"title":"Chinese collaborative study of survival analysis in 980 patients with AL amyloidosis","authors":"Hokhim Yau,&nbsp;Liye Zhong,&nbsp;Sheng Li,&nbsp;Weiting He,&nbsp;Yaxi Zhu,&nbsp;Pengjun Liao,&nbsp;Jianteng Xie,&nbsp;Hongwen Fei,&nbsp;Liwen Li,&nbsp;Hui Liu,&nbsp;Jie Li,&nbsp;Wenjian Wang","doi":"10.1002/med4.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The prognosis of patients with light-chain amyloidosis (AL) has improved markedly in the past decade in China; whether the current staging systems are suitable to predict the overall survival (OS) of the patients remains undetermined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Based on 980 biopsy-proved AL patients with 5-year follow-up from China Registration Network for Light-chain Amyloidosis, we evaluated the efficacy of existing staging systems and developed a new stratification model. This involved analyzing parameters such as N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) thresholds and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found that 30% patients were classified as stage I, 25% as stage II, 26% as stage III, and 19% as stage IV disease using the Mayo 2012 staging system, with varying median OS values. However, the observed median OS values were notably higher than previously reported. By incorporating NT-proBNP thresholds and eGFR values, we developed a four-stage score system. With this new model, 41.6% patients were reclassified to stage I, 34.3% to stage II, 17.8% to stage III, and 6.3% to stage IV disease, with adjusted median OS values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The new stratification model exhibited improved consistency compared to traditional staging systems. It effectively identified patients with the best and worst prognoses, even among those receiving comprehensive treatment. Specifically, NT-proBNP levels exceeding 9000 pg/mL combined with an eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> proved superior in prognosticating patient outcomes. Overall, the median OS of AL amyloidosis patients in China has significantly improved, underscoring the need for tailored prognostic models in clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100913,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/med4.53","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/med4.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The prognosis of patients with light-chain amyloidosis (AL) has improved markedly in the past decade in China; whether the current staging systems are suitable to predict the overall survival (OS) of the patients remains undetermined.

Methods

Based on 980 biopsy-proved AL patients with 5-year follow-up from China Registration Network for Light-chain Amyloidosis, we evaluated the efficacy of existing staging systems and developed a new stratification model. This involved analyzing parameters such as N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) thresholds and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

Results

We found that 30% patients were classified as stage I, 25% as stage II, 26% as stage III, and 19% as stage IV disease using the Mayo 2012 staging system, with varying median OS values. However, the observed median OS values were notably higher than previously reported. By incorporating NT-proBNP thresholds and eGFR values, we developed a four-stage score system. With this new model, 41.6% patients were reclassified to stage I, 34.3% to stage II, 17.8% to stage III, and 6.3% to stage IV disease, with adjusted median OS values.

Conclusion

The new stratification model exhibited improved consistency compared to traditional staging systems. It effectively identified patients with the best and worst prognoses, even among those receiving comprehensive treatment. Specifically, NT-proBNP levels exceeding 9000 pg/mL combined with an eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 proved superior in prognosticating patient outcomes. Overall, the median OS of AL amyloidosis patients in China has significantly improved, underscoring the need for tailored prognostic models in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

对 980 名 AL 淀粉样变性患者进行生存分析的中国合作研究
背景 近十年来,中国轻链淀粉样变性(AL)患者的预后明显改善,但目前的分期系统是否适合预测患者的总生存期(OS)仍未确定。 方法 我们以中国轻链淀粉样变性登记网络随访5年的980例活检证实的AL患者为基础,评估了现有分期系统的有效性,并开发了一个新的分层模型。这包括分析 N 端前脑钠尿肽(NT-proBNP)阈值和估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)等参数。 结果 我们发现,根据梅奥 2012 分期系统,30% 的患者被归为 I 期,25% 的患者被归为 II 期,26% 的患者被归为 III 期,19% 的患者被归为 IV 期,中位 OS 值各不相同。然而,观察到的中位 OS 值明显高于之前的报道。通过纳入 NT-proBNP 阈值和 eGFR 值,我们建立了一个四级评分系统。通过这一新模型,41.6% 的患者被重新分类为 I 期,34.3% 的患者被重新分类为 II 期,17.8% 的患者被重新分类为 III 期,6.3% 的患者被重新分类为 IV 期,并调整了中位 OS 值。 结论 与传统的分期系统相比,新的分层模型具有更好的一致性。即使在接受综合治疗的患者中,它也能有效识别预后最好和最差的患者。具体而言,NT-proBNP 水平超过 9000 pg/mL 且 eGFR 低于 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 的患者在预后方面更具优势。总体而言,中国AL淀粉样变性患者的中位OS已明显改善,这凸显了临床实践中对定制预后模型的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信