Thyroid cancer risk in women after hysterectomy: A nationwide cohort study

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Tsai-Sung Tai , Ching-Fang Tsai , Hsin-Yi Yang
{"title":"Thyroid cancer risk in women after hysterectomy: A nationwide cohort study","authors":"Tsai-Sung Tai ,&nbsp;Ching-Fang Tsai ,&nbsp;Hsin-Yi Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.107980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Hysterectomy is commonly performed for benign uterine pathologies but there is some controversy over whether it is associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer. This study examines the associations of hysterectomy with ovarian conservation or with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and thyroid cancer incidence in Taiwan.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed data from a nationwide health insurance claims database and identified 29,577 women aged ≥30 years who underwent hysterectomy with ovarian conservation or hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy between 2000 and 2016. Propensity score-matching analyses were performed at ratios of 1:1 for the hysterectomy and no-hysterectomy groups, to reduce selection bias. We monitored thyroid cancer occurrence in both groups until 2017. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios with 95 % confidence intervals and determine thyroid cancer risk in women who underwent hysterectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study comprised 29,577 patients who underwent any hysterectomy and 29,577 participants who did not. The mean follow-up period was 10.03 ± 4.92 years. Patients who underwent hysterectomy had higher thyroid cancer incidence (4.72 per 10,000 person-years) than those who did not (3.06 per 10,000 person-years) and a greater risk of any thyroid cancer (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.40; 95 % confidence interval = 1.08–1.82). However, there was no association between hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and thyroid cancer incidence (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest that women who undergo hysterectomy are at a higher risk of developing thyroid cancer than those who do not.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51120,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maturitas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512224000756","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Hysterectomy is commonly performed for benign uterine pathologies but there is some controversy over whether it is associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer. This study examines the associations of hysterectomy with ovarian conservation or with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and thyroid cancer incidence in Taiwan.

Methods

We analyzed data from a nationwide health insurance claims database and identified 29,577 women aged ≥30 years who underwent hysterectomy with ovarian conservation or hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy between 2000 and 2016. Propensity score-matching analyses were performed at ratios of 1:1 for the hysterectomy and no-hysterectomy groups, to reduce selection bias. We monitored thyroid cancer occurrence in both groups until 2017. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios with 95 % confidence intervals and determine thyroid cancer risk in women who underwent hysterectomy.

Results

The study comprised 29,577 patients who underwent any hysterectomy and 29,577 participants who did not. The mean follow-up period was 10.03 ± 4.92 years. Patients who underwent hysterectomy had higher thyroid cancer incidence (4.72 per 10,000 person-years) than those who did not (3.06 per 10,000 person-years) and a greater risk of any thyroid cancer (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.40; 95 % confidence interval = 1.08–1.82). However, there was no association between hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and thyroid cancer incidence (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that women who undergo hysterectomy are at a higher risk of developing thyroid cancer than those who do not.

子宫切除术后妇女患甲状腺癌的风险:全国性队列研究
目的子宫切除术是治疗子宫良性病变的常见手术,但它是否与甲状腺癌风险增加有关还存在争议。本研究探讨了台湾地区保留卵巢或双侧输卵管卵巢切除术的子宫切除术与甲状腺癌发病率的关系。方法我们分析了全国健康保险理赔数据库中的数据,确定了29577名年龄≥30岁的女性,她们在2000年至2016年间接受了保留卵巢的子宫切除术或双侧输卵管卵巢切除术。为减少选择偏差,我们对子宫切除组和未切除组进行了倾向得分匹配分析,比例为 1:1。我们对两组患者的甲状腺癌发生率进行了监测,直至 2017 年。我们采用Cox回归法计算了接受子宫切除术妇女的危险比和95%置信区间,并确定了她们患甲状腺癌的风险。平均随访时间为 10.03 ± 4.92 年。接受子宫切除术的患者的甲状腺癌发病率(每10,000人年4.72例)高于未接受子宫切除术的患者(每10,000人年3.06例),且罹患任何甲状腺癌的风险更高(调整后危险比=1.40;95%置信区间=1.08-1.82)。结论我们的研究结果表明,接受子宫切除术的妇女比未接受子宫切除术的妇女患甲状腺癌的风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maturitas
Maturitas 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Maturitas is an international multidisciplinary peer reviewed scientific journal of midlife health and beyond publishing original research, reviews, consensus statements and guidelines, and mini-reviews. The journal provides a forum for all aspects of postreproductive health in both genders ranging from basic science to health and social care. Topic areas include:• Aging• Alternative and Complementary medicines• Arthritis and Bone Health• Cancer• Cardiovascular Health• Cognitive and Physical Functioning• Epidemiology, health and social care• Gynecology/ Reproductive Endocrinology• Nutrition/ Obesity Diabetes/ Metabolic Syndrome• Menopause, Ovarian Aging• Mental Health• Pharmacology• Sexuality• Quality of Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信