Impact of a transversus abdominis plane block with low-dose magnesium sulphate coupled to bupivacaine on postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized trial

Q2 Nursing
Seham M. Moeen, Mohammed Yasser Y. Makhlouf, Mohamed H. Bakri
{"title":"Impact of a transversus abdominis plane block with low-dose magnesium sulphate coupled to bupivacaine on postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized trial","authors":"Seham M. Moeen,&nbsp;Mohammed Yasser Y. Makhlouf,&nbsp;Mohamed H. Bakri","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2024.100386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The subcostal transversus abdominis plane (STAP) block has recently been included in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In our study on STAP for LC, we compared the effectiveness of adding low-dose magnesium sulphate (MgSO<sub>4</sub>) to bupivacaine versus using bupivacaine alone. MgSO<sub>4</sub> was hypothesized to enhance the analgesic effects of bupivacaine and therefore aid in the recovery process.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sixty patients, aged 18–65 years, ASA I–II, undergoing LC, were randomly assigned to receive bilateral STAP 15 min before skin incision with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25 % and either 150 mg MgSO<sub>4</sub> (BM group) or 1.5 ml normal saline (B group). Pain scores, time to initial analgesic demand, overall analgesic requirement, sedation, emetic episodes, time to get out of bed, and patient satisfaction were recorded for the first 24 h following surgery. The Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test was used to analyze the non-normally distributed data between groups, while the Chi-square test or Fisher<sup>’</sup>s exact test was used to test categorical data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The BM group had statistically significant but clinically insignificant lower pain scores at rest and during coughing in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (<em>P</em> = 0.005 and <em>P</em> = 0.003), at 1 h (<em>P</em> = 0.005 and <em>P</em> = 0.015), 6 h (<em>P</em> = 0.009 and <em>P</em> = 0.003), 12 h (<em>P</em> = 0.017 and <em>P</em> = 0.001), and 24 h (<em>P</em> = 0.001 and <em>P</em> = 0.001) after surgery compared to the B group. Kaplan–Meier curves for times to the first paracetamol and morphine doses showed significant differences (log-rank test) between the groups (<em>P</em> = 0.001 and <em>P</em> = 0.003, respectively). Additionally, the total doses of paracetamol (<em>P</em> = 0.001) and morphine (<em>P</em> = 0.001) in the BM group were significantly lower than those in the B group during the first 24 h after surgery. Sedation and emetic episodes were identical between the groups. The Patient in the BM group ambulated faster (<em>P</em> = 0.001) and were more satisfied (<em>P</em> = 0.026) than those in the B group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Adding a low-dose (150 mg) of MgSO<sub>4</sub> to bupivacaine in the STAP block for LC was associated with improved analgesic outcomes in the first 24 h after surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Ethical approval</h3><p>Medical Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine, IRB no: 17,100,622 on November 15, 2016.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03612947) on August 2, 2018.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603024000207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The subcostal transversus abdominis plane (STAP) block has recently been included in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In our study on STAP for LC, we compared the effectiveness of adding low-dose magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) to bupivacaine versus using bupivacaine alone. MgSO4 was hypothesized to enhance the analgesic effects of bupivacaine and therefore aid in the recovery process.

Methods

Sixty patients, aged 18–65 years, ASA I–II, undergoing LC, were randomly assigned to receive bilateral STAP 15 min before skin incision with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25 % and either 150 mg MgSO4 (BM group) or 1.5 ml normal saline (B group). Pain scores, time to initial analgesic demand, overall analgesic requirement, sedation, emetic episodes, time to get out of bed, and patient satisfaction were recorded for the first 24 h following surgery. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the non-normally distributed data between groups, while the Chi-square test or Fishers exact test was used to test categorical data.

Results

The BM group had statistically significant but clinically insignificant lower pain scores at rest and during coughing in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (P = 0.005 and P = 0.003), at 1 h (P = 0.005 and P = 0.015), 6 h (P = 0.009 and P = 0.003), 12 h (P = 0.017 and P = 0.001), and 24 h (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001) after surgery compared to the B group. Kaplan–Meier curves for times to the first paracetamol and morphine doses showed significant differences (log-rank test) between the groups (P = 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Additionally, the total doses of paracetamol (P = 0.001) and morphine (P = 0.001) in the BM group were significantly lower than those in the B group during the first 24 h after surgery. Sedation and emetic episodes were identical between the groups. The Patient in the BM group ambulated faster (P = 0.001) and were more satisfied (P = 0.026) than those in the B group.

Conclusions

Adding a low-dose (150 mg) of MgSO4 to bupivacaine in the STAP block for LC was associated with improved analgesic outcomes in the first 24 h after surgery.

Ethical approval

Medical Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine, IRB no: 17,100,622 on November 15, 2016.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03612947) on August 2, 2018.

腹横肌平面阻滞配合低剂量硫酸镁和布比卡因对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛的影响:随机试验
目的最近,肋下腹横肌平面(STAP)阻滞已被纳入腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案中。在针对腹腔镜胆囊切除术 STAP 的研究中,我们比较了在布比卡因中加入低剂量硫酸镁(MgSO4)与单独使用布比卡因的效果。方法将 60 名年龄在 18-65 岁之间、ASA I-II 级、接受 LC 的患者随机分配,在皮肤切开前 15 分钟接受双侧 STAP,即 20 毫升 0.25 % 布比卡因和 150 毫克硫酸镁(BM 组)或 1.5 毫升生理盐水(B 组)。记录术后 24 小时内的疼痛评分、首次镇痛需求时间、总体镇痛需求、镇静、呕吐发作、下床活动时间和患者满意度。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验分析组间非正态分布数据,采用 Chi-square 检验或 Fisher's 精确检验检验分类数据。005 和 P = 0.003)、术后 1 小时(P = 0.005 和 P = 0.015)、6 小时(P = 0.009 和 P = 0.003)、12 小时(P = 0.017 和 P = 0.001)和 24 小时(P = 0.001 和 P = 0.001)的疼痛评分均低于 B 组。首次服用扑热息痛和吗啡的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示,两组间存在显著差异(对数秩检验)(分别为 P = 0.001 和 P = 0.003)。此外,在术后 24 小时内,BM 组的扑热息痛(P = 0.001)和吗啡(P = 0.001)总剂量明显低于 B 组。两组患者的镇静和呕吐情况相同。结论LC STAP阻滞术中在布比卡因中加入低剂量(150 毫克)硫酸镁可改善术后头 24 小时的镇痛效果。伦理批准医学院医学伦理委员会,IRB 编号:17100622,2016 年 11 月 15 日。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03612947),2018 年 8 月 2 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信