Intensive Glycemic Management Is Associated With Reduced Retinal Structure Abnormalities on Ocular Coherence Tomography in the DCCT/EDIC Study.

Diabetes care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.2337/dc23-2408
Barbara Blodi, Thomas W Gardner, Xiaoyu Gao, Jennifer K Sun, Gayle M Lorenzi, Lisa C Olmos de Koo, Arup Das, Neil H White, Rose A Gubitosi-Klug, Lloyd P Aiello, Ionut Bebu
{"title":"Intensive Glycemic Management Is Associated With Reduced Retinal Structure Abnormalities on Ocular Coherence Tomography in the DCCT/EDIC Study.","authors":"Barbara Blodi, Thomas W Gardner, Xiaoyu Gao, Jennifer K Sun, Gayle M Lorenzi, Lisa C Olmos de Koo, Arup Das, Neil H White, Rose A Gubitosi-Klug, Lloyd P Aiello, Ionut Bebu","doi":"10.2337/dc23-2408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate quantitative and qualitative changes in retinal structure using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and their associations with systemic or other risk factors in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study, OCT images were obtained during study years 25-28 (2019-2022) in 937 participants; 54% and 46% were from the original intensive (INT) and conventional (CONV) glycemic management treatment groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average age for participants was 61 years old, diabetes duration 39 years, and HbA1c 7.6%. Participants originally in the CONV group were more likely to have disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) (CONV 27.3% vs. INT 18.7%; P = 0.0003), intraretinal fluid (CONV 24.4% vs. INT 19.2%; P = 0.0222), and intraretinal cysts (CONV 20.8% vs. INT 16.6%; P = 0.0471). In multivariable models, sex, age, smoking, mean updated systolic blood pressure, and history of \"clinically significant\" macular edema (CSME) and of anti-VEGF treatment were independently associated with changes in central subfield thickness, while HbA1c, BMI, and history of CSME and of ocular surgery were associated with DRIL. Visual acuity (VA) decline was associated with significant thinning of all retinal subfields except for the central and inner nasal subfields.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early intensive glycemic management in T1D is associated with a decreased risk of DRIL. This important morphological abnormality was associated with a history of macular edema, a history of ocular surgery, and worse VA. This study reveals benefits of intensive glycemic management on the retina beyond features detected by fundus photographs and ophthalmoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"1522-1529"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-2408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate quantitative and qualitative changes in retinal structure using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and their associations with systemic or other risk factors in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Research design and methods: In the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study, OCT images were obtained during study years 25-28 (2019-2022) in 937 participants; 54% and 46% were from the original intensive (INT) and conventional (CONV) glycemic management treatment groups, respectively.

Results: Average age for participants was 61 years old, diabetes duration 39 years, and HbA1c 7.6%. Participants originally in the CONV group were more likely to have disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) (CONV 27.3% vs. INT 18.7%; P = 0.0003), intraretinal fluid (CONV 24.4% vs. INT 19.2%; P = 0.0222), and intraretinal cysts (CONV 20.8% vs. INT 16.6%; P = 0.0471). In multivariable models, sex, age, smoking, mean updated systolic blood pressure, and history of "clinically significant" macular edema (CSME) and of anti-VEGF treatment were independently associated with changes in central subfield thickness, while HbA1c, BMI, and history of CSME and of ocular surgery were associated with DRIL. Visual acuity (VA) decline was associated with significant thinning of all retinal subfields except for the central and inner nasal subfields.

Conclusions: Early intensive glycemic management in T1D is associated with a decreased risk of DRIL. This important morphological abnormality was associated with a history of macular edema, a history of ocular surgery, and worse VA. This study reveals benefits of intensive glycemic management on the retina beyond features detected by fundus photographs and ophthalmoscopy.

在 DCCT/EDIC 研究中,强化血糖管理与减少眼相干断层扫描显示的视网膜结构异常有关。
研究目的利用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)研究1型糖尿病(T1D)患者视网膜结构的定量和定性变化及其与全身或其他风险因素的关联:在糖尿病干预和并发症流行病学(EDIC)研究中,研究人员在第25-28年(2019-2022年)期间获取了937名参与者的OCT图像;54%和46%的参与者分别来自最初的强化(INT)和常规(CONV)血糖管理治疗组:参与者的平均年龄为 61 岁,糖尿病病程为 39 年,HbA1c 为 7.6%。CONV组患者更容易出现视网膜内层紊乱(DRIL)(CONV 27.3% vs. INT 18.7%;P = 0.0003)、视网膜内积液(CONV 24.4% vs. INT 19.2%;P = 0.0222)和视网膜内囊肿(CONV 20.8% vs. INT 16.6%;P = 0.0471)。在多变量模型中,性别、年龄、吸烟、平均最新收缩压、"有临床意义的 "黄斑水肿(CSME)和抗血管内皮生长因子治疗史与中央子野厚度的变化独立相关,而 HbA1c、体重指数、CSME 和眼科手术史与 DRIL 相关。视力(VA)下降与所有视网膜子场的显著变薄有关,但中央子场和鼻内侧子场除外:结论:T1D 患者早期强化血糖管理可降低 DRIL 的风险。这一重要的形态异常与黄斑水肿病史、眼科手术史和视力恶化有关。这项研究揭示了强化血糖管理对视网膜的益处,而不仅仅局限于眼底照片和眼底镜检查所发现的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信