Do all patients with history of pelvic ring injuries need a cesarean section? – A survey of orthopaedic and obstetric providers

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jasmine Scott , Jenna Glavy , Bradley Deafenbaugh , William Kent , Yvette LaCoursiere , Alexandra Schwartz , Monica Lutgendorf , Benjamin Wheatley
{"title":"Do all patients with history of pelvic ring injuries need a cesarean section? – A survey of orthopaedic and obstetric providers","authors":"Jasmine Scott ,&nbsp;Jenna Glavy ,&nbsp;Bradley Deafenbaugh ,&nbsp;William Kent ,&nbsp;Yvette LaCoursiere ,&nbsp;Alexandra Schwartz ,&nbsp;Monica Lutgendorf ,&nbsp;Benjamin Wheatley","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective(s)</h3><p>The recommended mode of delivery following pelvic ring fractures with surgical fixation is unclear. The objective of this study was to assess expert opinions from orthopaedic surgeons and obstetrician gynecologists on their recommended delivery recommendations for pregnant individuals with a history of pelvic ring injury, and to see if there was any difference in recommendations between the two specialties, and what factors influenced recommendations.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>An electronic, web-based survey was administered to a convenience sample of orthopaedic surgeons and obstetrician gynecologists, via advertisement to members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine, and querying obstetrician gynecologists practicing within the Military Health System. The survey was administered from November 2021 to December 2022. A two-proportion z-test, Chi-square or Fisher's Exact Test, and descriptive statistics were used to analyze data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Survey respondents included 44 orthopaedic surgeons and 37 obstetricians. A total of 74 % obstetricians would recommend a trial of labor with hardware in place, while orthopaedic surgeon's recommendations varied based on the type of fixation. Forty four, 100 % of orthopaedic surgeons, recommended trial of labor if non-operative pelvic injury or unilateral posterior fixation only, 88 % recommended trial of labor if bilateral posterior fixation only, and 47.7 % for anterior trans-symphyseal plating only, 50 % for unilateral posterior and trans-symphyseal plating, and 43.2 % for bilateral posterior fixation with trans-symphyseal plating.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of these surveys demonstrate the lack of consensus as to the most appropriate birth plan for patients with a history of pelvic ring injuries. Vaginal delivery following pelvic ring fracture and fixation is possible, yet these patients are significantly more likely to undergo cesarean section than the general population. As such, we recommend that women who become pregnant after operative treatment of a pelvic ring injury develop an in-depth birthing plan with their obstetrician to determine the best course.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"53 6","pages":"Article 102779"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724000576","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective(s)

The recommended mode of delivery following pelvic ring fractures with surgical fixation is unclear. The objective of this study was to assess expert opinions from orthopaedic surgeons and obstetrician gynecologists on their recommended delivery recommendations for pregnant individuals with a history of pelvic ring injury, and to see if there was any difference in recommendations between the two specialties, and what factors influenced recommendations.

Study design

An electronic, web-based survey was administered to a convenience sample of orthopaedic surgeons and obstetrician gynecologists, via advertisement to members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine, and querying obstetrician gynecologists practicing within the Military Health System. The survey was administered from November 2021 to December 2022. A two-proportion z-test, Chi-square or Fisher's Exact Test, and descriptive statistics were used to analyze data.

Results

Survey respondents included 44 orthopaedic surgeons and 37 obstetricians. A total of 74 % obstetricians would recommend a trial of labor with hardware in place, while orthopaedic surgeon's recommendations varied based on the type of fixation. Forty four, 100 % of orthopaedic surgeons, recommended trial of labor if non-operative pelvic injury or unilateral posterior fixation only, 88 % recommended trial of labor if bilateral posterior fixation only, and 47.7 % for anterior trans-symphyseal plating only, 50 % for unilateral posterior and trans-symphyseal plating, and 43.2 % for bilateral posterior fixation with trans-symphyseal plating.

Conclusions

The results of these surveys demonstrate the lack of consensus as to the most appropriate birth plan for patients with a history of pelvic ring injuries. Vaginal delivery following pelvic ring fracture and fixation is possible, yet these patients are significantly more likely to undergo cesarean section than the general population. As such, we recommend that women who become pregnant after operative treatment of a pelvic ring injury develop an in-depth birthing plan with their obstetrician to determine the best course.

所有有骨盆环损伤史的患者都需要剖腹产吗?- 骨科医生和产科医生调查。
目的:骨盆环骨折手术固定后的推荐分娩方式尚不明确。本研究旨在评估骨科外科医生和妇产科医生对有骨盆环损伤史的孕妇分娩建议的专家意见,并了解这两个专业的建议是否存在差异,以及影响建议的因素有哪些:研究设计:通过向创伤骨科协会(OTA)和母胎医学会的会员发布广告,并询问在军事卫生系统执业的妇产科医生,对骨科外科医生和妇产科医生的便利样本进行了一项基于网络的电子调查。调查时间为 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 12 月。采用两比例z检验、卡方检验或费雪精确检验以及描述性统计来分析数据:调查对象包括 44 名骨科医生和 37 名产科医生。共有 74% 的产科医生会建议在固定硬件的情况下进行试产,而骨科医生的建议则根据固定类型而有所不同。44名骨科医生(100%)建议在非手术骨盆损伤或仅单侧后固定的情况下进行试产,88%的骨科医生建议在双侧后固定的情况下进行试产,47.7%的骨科医生建议仅进行前方经骺板固定,50%的骨科医生建议进行单侧后固定和经骺板固定,43.2%的骨科医生建议进行双侧后固定和经骺板固定:这些调查结果表明,对于有骨盆环损伤病史的患者最合适的分娩计划缺乏共识。骨盆环骨折和固定术后经阴道分娩是可行的,但这些患者接受剖宫产的几率明显高于普通人群。因此,我们建议盆骨环损伤手术治疗后怀孕的妇女与产科医生一起制定深入的分娩计划,以确定最佳的分娩方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信