Theoretical Prediction of the 210 Pb Burden in the Skeleton from Radon Exposure and Other Intake Routes.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Health physics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1097/HP.0000000000001807
Jing Wang, Yuanyuan Liu, Bin Wu, Xiangpeng Meng, Yu Wang, Jianping Cheng
{"title":"Theoretical Prediction of the 210 Pb Burden in the Skeleton from Radon Exposure and Other Intake Routes.","authors":"Jing Wang, Yuanyuan Liu, Bin Wu, Xiangpeng Meng, Yu Wang, Jianping Cheng","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The 210 Pb burden in the skeleton is a measurement value suitable for the estimation of the cumulative exposure to radon, based on which the resultant risk of lung cancer can be derived. There have been a handful of studies that successfully measured 210 Pb activity in the bones of volunteers who had chronic exposure to high concentrations of radon occupationally or in their residences. However, the quantitative relationship between measured 210 Pb activity and radon exposure remains elusive. Herein, we investigate the origin of the skeletal burden by employing the biokinetic model recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection and modeling various routes of intake. First, the baseline 210 Pb burden for the general public regarding eating assorted foodstuffs and breathing normal air is obtained. It is found that this baseline burden ranges between 7.3 to 46.5 Bq for a 50-y-old (male) person, which characterizes a large variance due to the uncertainty of each route of intake. Next, we concentrate on radon exposure by referring to two experimental studies where the accounts of exposure and the measured 210 Pb burden for each volunteer are documented in detail. From comparing our prediction and measurements, it is found that exposure to higher concentration of radon is the most significant source of 210 Pb intake, and the quantitative differences can be reasonably explained by the uncertainty resulting from regular intake routes. This study establishes the theoretical foundation for assessing one's risk of lung cancer due to radon exposure by measuring the 210 Pb burden in bones.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":"287-297"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001807","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The 210 Pb burden in the skeleton is a measurement value suitable for the estimation of the cumulative exposure to radon, based on which the resultant risk of lung cancer can be derived. There have been a handful of studies that successfully measured 210 Pb activity in the bones of volunteers who had chronic exposure to high concentrations of radon occupationally or in their residences. However, the quantitative relationship between measured 210 Pb activity and radon exposure remains elusive. Herein, we investigate the origin of the skeletal burden by employing the biokinetic model recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection and modeling various routes of intake. First, the baseline 210 Pb burden for the general public regarding eating assorted foodstuffs and breathing normal air is obtained. It is found that this baseline burden ranges between 7.3 to 46.5 Bq for a 50-y-old (male) person, which characterizes a large variance due to the uncertainty of each route of intake. Next, we concentrate on radon exposure by referring to two experimental studies where the accounts of exposure and the measured 210 Pb burden for each volunteer are documented in detail. From comparing our prediction and measurements, it is found that exposure to higher concentration of radon is the most significant source of 210 Pb intake, and the quantitative differences can be reasonably explained by the uncertainty resulting from regular intake routes. This study establishes the theoretical foundation for assessing one's risk of lung cancer due to radon exposure by measuring the 210 Pb burden in bones.

从氡暴露和其他摄入途径对骨骼中 210Pb 负担的理论预测。
摘要:骨骼中的 210Pb 负荷是一个测量值,适用于估算氡的累积暴露量,并据此得出肺癌风险。已有少数研究成功测量了长期暴露于高浓度氡的职业或居住地志愿者骨骼中的 210Pb 活性。然而,所测得的 210Pb 活度与氡暴露之间的定量关系仍然难以捉摸。在此,我们采用国际辐射防护委员会推荐的生物动力学模型,并对各种摄入途径进行建模,从而研究骨骼负荷的来源。首先,我们获得了普通公众在食用各种食品和呼吸正常空气时的 210Pb 基准负荷。结果发现,一个 50 岁(男性)的人的基准负荷介于 7.3 至 46.5 Bq 之间,由于各种摄入途径的不确定性,差异很大。接下来,我们参考了两项实验研究,其中详细记录了每位志愿者的氡暴露情况和测得的 210Pb 负荷。通过比较我们的预测和测量结果,我们发现暴露于较高浓度的氡气是摄入 210Pb 的最主要来源,而数量上的差异可以通过常规摄入途径所产生的不确定性得到合理解释。这项研究为通过测量骨骼中的 210Pb 负荷来评估因暴露于氡气而罹患肺癌的风险奠定了理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health physics
Health physics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信