Cardiac Adverse Events and Remdesivir in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Post Hoc Safety Analysis of the Randomized DisCoVeRy Trial.

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Vida Terzić, Joe Miantezila Basilua, Nicolas Billard, Lucie de Gastines, Drifa Belhadi, Claire Fougerou-Leurent, Nathan Peiffer-Smadja, Noémie Mercier, Christelle Delmas, Assia Ferrane, Aline Dechanet, Julien Poissy, Hélène Espérou, Florence Ader, Maya Hites, Claire Andrejak, Richard Greil, José-Artur Paiva, Thérèse Staub, Evelina Tacconelli, Charles Burdet, Dominique Costagliola, France Mentré, Yazdan Yazdanpanah, Alpha Diallo
{"title":"Cardiac Adverse Events and Remdesivir in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Post Hoc Safety Analysis of the Randomized DisCoVeRy Trial.","authors":"Vida Terzić, Joe Miantezila Basilua, Nicolas Billard, Lucie de Gastines, Drifa Belhadi, Claire Fougerou-Leurent, Nathan Peiffer-Smadja, Noémie Mercier, Christelle Delmas, Assia Ferrane, Aline Dechanet, Julien Poissy, Hélène Espérou, Florence Ader, Maya Hites, Claire Andrejak, Richard Greil, José-Artur Paiva, Thérèse Staub, Evelina Tacconelli, Charles Burdet, Dominique Costagliola, France Mentré, Yazdan Yazdanpanah, Alpha Diallo","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the cardiac adverse events (AEs) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who received remdesivir plus standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone (control), as an association was noted in some cohort studies and disproportionality analyses of safety databases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This post hoc safety analysis is based on data from the multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled DisCoVeRy trial in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Any first AE that occurred between randomization and day 29 in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population randomized to either remdesivir or control group was considered. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for event rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cardiac AEs were reported in 46 (11.2%) of 410 and 48 (11.3%) of 423 patients in the mITT population (n = 833) enrolled in the remdesivir and control groups, respectively. The difference between both groups was not significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], .7-1.5; P = .98), even when serious and nonserious cardiac AEs were evaluated separately. The majority of reports in both groups were of arrhythmic nature (remdesivir, 84.8%; control, 83.3%) and were associated with a favorable outcome. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the occurrence of cardiac AE subclasses, including arrhythmic events (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, .7-1.7; P = .68).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remdesivir treatment was not associated with an increased risk of cardiac AEs compared with control in patients hospitalized with moderate or severe COVID-19. These results are consistent with other randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04315948; EudraCT 2020-000936-23.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11327784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae170","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aimed to evaluate the cardiac adverse events (AEs) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who received remdesivir plus standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone (control), as an association was noted in some cohort studies and disproportionality analyses of safety databases.

Methods: This post hoc safety analysis is based on data from the multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled DisCoVeRy trial in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Any first AE that occurred between randomization and day 29 in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population randomized to either remdesivir or control group was considered. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for event rates.

Results: Cardiac AEs were reported in 46 (11.2%) of 410 and 48 (11.3%) of 423 patients in the mITT population (n = 833) enrolled in the remdesivir and control groups, respectively. The difference between both groups was not significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], .7-1.5; P = .98), even when serious and nonserious cardiac AEs were evaluated separately. The majority of reports in both groups were of arrhythmic nature (remdesivir, 84.8%; control, 83.3%) and were associated with a favorable outcome. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the occurrence of cardiac AE subclasses, including arrhythmic events (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, .7-1.7; P = .68).

Conclusions: Remdesivir treatment was not associated with an increased risk of cardiac AEs compared with control in patients hospitalized with moderate or severe COVID-19. These results are consistent with other randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04315948; EudraCT 2020-000936-23.

冠状病毒病住院患者的心脏不良事件与 Remdesivir 2019 (COVID-19):随机DisCoVeRy试验的事后安全性分析》。
背景:我们的目的是评估接受雷米地韦加标准护理(SoC)与仅接受SoC(对照)的2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)住院患者的心脏不良事件(AEs),因为在一些队列研究和安全数据库的比例失调分析中发现两者之间存在关联:这项事后安全性分析基于在 COVID-19 住院患者中开展的多中心、随机、开放标签、对照 DisCoVeRy 试验(NCT04315948)的数据。在随机分配到雷米替韦或对照组的改良意向性治疗(mITT)人群中,从随机分配到第29天之间发生的任何首次AE均被考虑在内。采用卡普兰-梅耶生存曲线进行分析,并计算事件发生率的卡普兰-梅耶估计值:在雷米地韦组和对照组的mITT人群(n = 833)中,分别有410名和423名患者(n = 833)中的46名(11.2%)和48名(11.3%)报告了心脏AE。即使分别评估严重和非严重心脏AE,两组之间的差异也不显著(HR 1.0,95% CI 0.7-1.5,p = 0.98)。两组中的大多数报告均为心律失常(雷米地韦,84.8%;对照组,83.3%),并与良好的治疗结果相关。雷米替韦组与对照组在不同心脏AE亚类(包括心律失常事件)的发生率上没有明显差异(HR 1.1,95% CI:0.7-1.7,P = 0.68):结论:与对照组相比,在中度或重度COVID-19住院患者中,雷米替韦治疗与心脏AE风险增加(无论是否严重)无关,也与AE严重程度无关。这与其他随机对照试验和荟萃分析的结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
900
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信