Ambuj Mishra, Rajman Gupta, Rajendra Kr. Joshi, Satish Chandra Garkoti
{"title":"Topography-mediated light environment regulates intra-specific seasonal and diurnal patterns of photosynthetic plasticity and plant ecophysiological adaptation strategies","authors":"Ambuj Mishra, Rajman Gupta, Rajendra Kr. Joshi, Satish Chandra Garkoti","doi":"10.1007/s12298-024-01439-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to substantial topographic variations in the Himalaya, incident solar radiation in the forest canopy is highly unequal. This results in significant environmental differences at finer scales and may lead to considerable differences in photosynthetic productivity in montane forests. Therefore, local-scale ecophysiological investigations, may be more effective and instructive than landscape-level inventories and models. We investigated leaf ecophysiological differences and related adaptations between two <i>Quercus semecarpifolia</i> forests in aspect-mediated, significantly varying light regimes in the same mountain catchment. Seasonal and diurnal rates of photosynthesis (A) were significantly higher in south aspect (S) than the north (N). Although temperature was a key contributor to seasonal fluctuations in photosynthetic physiology, photoperiod significantly determined intraspecific variations in seasonal and diurnal plasticity of leaf ecophysiological traits between the two topography-mediated light environments. The regression model for A as a function of stomatal conductivity (gsw) explained the critical role of gsw in triggering photosynthetic plasticity as an adaptive function against varying environmental stresses due to seasonal solar differences. We also examined, modifications in chlorophyll content between the two light regimes across seasons to determine the chlorophyll adaptation strategy. The N aspect had higher leaf chl a, b, and chl a + b and a lower chl-allocation ratio (a/b) than S, which helped to optimize the required light reception in the photoreaction centers for improved photosynthetic performance. The leaf light response curves for A and gsw were observed against varying incident photosynthetic photon flux densities (0–2000 mol.m<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> PPFD) for both aspects. We found that the same species developed significantly distinct light response strategies and photosynthetic capacities in S than in N for the given magnitudes of PPFD. Such acquired ecophysiological adaptations owing to varying light environments may provide significant clues for understanding the impact of future climate change on Himalayan tree species.</p>","PeriodicalId":20148,"journal":{"name":"Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-024-01439-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Due to substantial topographic variations in the Himalaya, incident solar radiation in the forest canopy is highly unequal. This results in significant environmental differences at finer scales and may lead to considerable differences in photosynthetic productivity in montane forests. Therefore, local-scale ecophysiological investigations, may be more effective and instructive than landscape-level inventories and models. We investigated leaf ecophysiological differences and related adaptations between two Quercus semecarpifolia forests in aspect-mediated, significantly varying light regimes in the same mountain catchment. Seasonal and diurnal rates of photosynthesis (A) were significantly higher in south aspect (S) than the north (N). Although temperature was a key contributor to seasonal fluctuations in photosynthetic physiology, photoperiod significantly determined intraspecific variations in seasonal and diurnal plasticity of leaf ecophysiological traits between the two topography-mediated light environments. The regression model for A as a function of stomatal conductivity (gsw) explained the critical role of gsw in triggering photosynthetic plasticity as an adaptive function against varying environmental stresses due to seasonal solar differences. We also examined, modifications in chlorophyll content between the two light regimes across seasons to determine the chlorophyll adaptation strategy. The N aspect had higher leaf chl a, b, and chl a + b and a lower chl-allocation ratio (a/b) than S, which helped to optimize the required light reception in the photoreaction centers for improved photosynthetic performance. The leaf light response curves for A and gsw were observed against varying incident photosynthetic photon flux densities (0–2000 mol.m2 s−1 PPFD) for both aspects. We found that the same species developed significantly distinct light response strategies and photosynthetic capacities in S than in N for the given magnitudes of PPFD. Such acquired ecophysiological adaptations owing to varying light environments may provide significant clues for understanding the impact of future climate change on Himalayan tree species.
由于喜马拉雅山的地形变化很大,森林冠层的入射太阳辐射非常不均等。这就造成了更细尺度上的显著环境差异,并可能导致山地森林光合生产力的巨大差异。因此,地方尺度的生态生理学调查可能比景观尺度的调查和模型更有效、更有指导意义。我们研究了同一山区集水区内两片柞树林的叶片生态生理学差异及相关适应性,这些森林的光照条件在方位上有显著差异。南向(S)的光合作用季节率和昼夜率(A)明显高于北向(N)。虽然温度是光合生理季节性波动的关键因素,但光周期在很大程度上决定了两种地形介导的光照环境之间叶片生态生理特征的季节性和昼夜可塑性的种内差异。A作为气孔导度(gsw)函数的回归模型解释了gsw在触发光合可塑性中的关键作用,光合可塑性是对季节性日照差异造成的不同环境压力的一种适应性功能。我们还研究了两种光照条件下叶绿素含量在不同季节的变化,以确定叶绿素适应策略。与 S 相比,N 方面的叶片叶绿素 a、b 和叶绿素 a + b 较高,叶绿素分配比例(a/b)较低,这有助于优化光反应中心所需的光接收,从而提高光合作用性能。针对不同的入射光合光通量密度(0-2000 mol.m2 s-1 PPFD),我们观察了 A 和 gsw 两方面的叶片光响应曲线。我们发现,在给定的 PPFD 量级下,同一物种在 S 区比在 N 区形成了明显不同的光响应策略和光合能力。这种对不同光照环境的后天生态生理适应可能为了解未来气候变化对喜马拉雅山树种的影响提供重要线索。
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1995, Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants (PMBP) is a peer reviewed monthly journal co-published by Springer Nature. It contains research and review articles, short communications, commentaries, book reviews etc., in all areas of functional plant biology including, but not limited to plant physiology, biochemistry, molecular genetics, molecular pathology, biophysics, cell and molecular biology, genetics, genomics and bioinformatics. Its integrated and interdisciplinary approach reflects the global growth trajectories in functional plant biology, attracting authors/editors/reviewers from over 98 countries.