Service coverage and health workforce allocation strategies for geriatric and palliative care in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review

Dipika Shankar Bhattacharyya , Md. Hasibul Hossain , Goutam Kumar Dutta , Marzia Feruz Snigdha , Iffat Nowrin , KM Saif-Ur-Rahman
{"title":"Service coverage and health workforce allocation strategies for geriatric and palliative care in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review","authors":"Dipika Shankar Bhattacharyya ,&nbsp;Md. Hasibul Hossain ,&nbsp;Goutam Kumar Dutta ,&nbsp;Marzia Feruz Snigdha ,&nbsp;Iffat Nowrin ,&nbsp;KM Saif-Ur-Rahman","doi":"10.1016/j.hsr.2024.100166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The rapidly expanding older population across Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) underscores the urgent need to strengthen the health systems. However, the extent of service coverage and healthcare workforce allocation strategies for geriatric and palliative care in LMICs remains inadequately explored. To address this, we conducted this systematic review, following the standard guidelines, to synthesize available data from four databases spanning 2011 to 2022. Utilizing the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for non-randomized studies (ROBANS) for quantitative studies and the JBI (formerly known as Joanna Briggs Institute) checklist for qualitative research, we assessed the risk of bias and the quality in the included studies. Despite a comprehensive search, only three eligible studies were found, revealing a scarcity of research. The identified challenges include deficiencies in leadership, governance, financing, and essential resources, leading to compromised service coverage. The health workforce, often limited and lacking inadequate training, exacerbates the situation. Our evidence synthesis proposes some potential solutions such as telemedicine and cross-country collaboration through distance learning mechanisms to address these issues. The findings and recommendations from this review offer valuable insights applicable across various healthcare service contexts within LMICs and advocate for more health systems research in this topic area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73214,"journal":{"name":"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772632024000199/pdfft?md5=c4f0c571fc54b13bc441636d1c74d208&pid=1-s2.0-S2772632024000199-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772632024000199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapidly expanding older population across Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) underscores the urgent need to strengthen the health systems. However, the extent of service coverage and healthcare workforce allocation strategies for geriatric and palliative care in LMICs remains inadequately explored. To address this, we conducted this systematic review, following the standard guidelines, to synthesize available data from four databases spanning 2011 to 2022. Utilizing the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for non-randomized studies (ROBANS) for quantitative studies and the JBI (formerly known as Joanna Briggs Institute) checklist for qualitative research, we assessed the risk of bias and the quality in the included studies. Despite a comprehensive search, only three eligible studies were found, revealing a scarcity of research. The identified challenges include deficiencies in leadership, governance, financing, and essential resources, leading to compromised service coverage. The health workforce, often limited and lacking inadequate training, exacerbates the situation. Our evidence synthesis proposes some potential solutions such as telemedicine and cross-country collaboration through distance learning mechanisms to address these issues. The findings and recommendations from this review offer valuable insights applicable across various healthcare service contexts within LMICs and advocate for more health systems research in this topic area.

中低收入国家老年病和姑息关怀的服务覆盖面和医疗队伍分配战略:系统回顾
中低收入国家(LMICs)的老年人口迅速增长,凸显了加强医疗系统的迫切需要。然而,对于中低收入国家老年病和姑息关怀服务的覆盖范围和医疗保健人员的分配策略仍未进行充分的探讨。为了解决这一问题,我们按照标准指南进行了此次系统性综述,综合了来自四个数据库的可用数据,时间跨度为 2011 年至 2022 年。我们使用非随机研究偏倚风险评估工具(ROBANS)对定量研究进行评估,并使用 JBI(前身为乔安娜-布里格斯研究所)清单对定性研究进行评估,从而对纳入研究的偏倚风险和质量进行评估。尽管我们进行了全面的搜索,但只发现了三项符合条件的研究,这表明研究成果十分匮乏。已确定的挑战包括领导力、治理、资金和基本资源方面的不足,导致服务覆盖面受到影响。而医疗卫生人员的数量往往有限且缺乏足够的培训,使情况更加恶化。我们的证据综述提出了一些潜在的解决方案,如通过远程学习机制开展远程医疗和跨国合作,以解决这些问题。本综述的研究结果和建议提供了适用于低收入和中等收入国家各种医疗服务环境的宝贵见解,并倡导在这一主题领域开展更多的医疗系统研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health sciences review (Oxford, England)
Health sciences review (Oxford, England) Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
75 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信