Clinical evaluation of resorbable polylactic acid (PLA) intracanal posts for primary incisor restoration. Randomized controlled clinical trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-03 DOI:10.22514/jocpd.2024.039
Hua Xu, Xuefang Chen, Junrong Wang, Qian Zou, Fengna Qi, Xiaolan Ma
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of resorbable polylactic acid (PLA) intracanal posts for primary incisor restoration. Randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Hua Xu, Xuefang Chen, Junrong Wang, Qian Zou, Fengna Qi, Xiaolan Ma","doi":"10.22514/jocpd.2024.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This randomized, controlled clinical trial compares the clinical performance of glass-fibre and resorbable polylactic acid (PLA) intracanal posts used to restore carious primary incisors in young patients. The study sample includes 180 primary upper central incisors of 90 children aged 3 to 4 years. All patients were randomly divided into two equal groups of 45 children who received PLA and glass-fibre (GFP) intracanal posts. The clinical assessment of incisor restorations was carried out immediately upon completion and at months 3, 6 and 12 according to the following criteria: anatomical form, marginal adaptation, surface roughness, marginal pigmentation, colour match, secondary caries and contact point. The Gingival Index (GI), the Bleeding Index (Cowell modification; mBI), and bite force (BF) were measured. At the 3-month follow-up, the occlusal BF of patients who received PLA posts was higher than the baseline; the GI and mBI scores were lower, by contrast (<i>p</i> < 0.05). This tendency was even more pronounced 6 and 12 months after the restoration. The incidence of side effects or symptoms (apical inflammation, cervical fracture, loosening of the crown) after the PLA posts was significantly lower than after the GFP (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were present between the two groups with respect to colour matching, anatomical form, marginal adaptation, marginal pigmentation, surface roughness, occlusal contact and secondary caries. Based on the results, applying PLA intracanal posts and cyanoacrylate to residual anterior crowns in young children can improve their gingival health, reduce side effects, and increase the likelihood of successful restoration.</p>","PeriodicalId":50235,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"48 2","pages":"102-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/jocpd.2024.039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This randomized, controlled clinical trial compares the clinical performance of glass-fibre and resorbable polylactic acid (PLA) intracanal posts used to restore carious primary incisors in young patients. The study sample includes 180 primary upper central incisors of 90 children aged 3 to 4 years. All patients were randomly divided into two equal groups of 45 children who received PLA and glass-fibre (GFP) intracanal posts. The clinical assessment of incisor restorations was carried out immediately upon completion and at months 3, 6 and 12 according to the following criteria: anatomical form, marginal adaptation, surface roughness, marginal pigmentation, colour match, secondary caries and contact point. The Gingival Index (GI), the Bleeding Index (Cowell modification; mBI), and bite force (BF) were measured. At the 3-month follow-up, the occlusal BF of patients who received PLA posts was higher than the baseline; the GI and mBI scores were lower, by contrast (p < 0.05). This tendency was even more pronounced 6 and 12 months after the restoration. The incidence of side effects or symptoms (apical inflammation, cervical fracture, loosening of the crown) after the PLA posts was significantly lower than after the GFP (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were present between the two groups with respect to colour matching, anatomical form, marginal adaptation, marginal pigmentation, surface roughness, occlusal contact and secondary caries. Based on the results, applying PLA intracanal posts and cyanoacrylate to residual anterior crowns in young children can improve their gingival health, reduce side effects, and increase the likelihood of successful restoration.

用于主切牙修复的可吸收聚乳酸(PLA)髓内桩的临床评估。随机对照临床试验。
这项随机对照临床试验比较了玻璃纤维和可吸收聚乳酸(PLA)牙槽内桩用于修复年幼患者龋坏的原切牙的临床表现。研究样本包括 90 名 3 至 4 岁儿童的 180 颗主上中切牙。所有患者被随机分为两组,每组 45 人,分别接受聚乳酸和玻璃纤维(GFP)龈内桩修复。在门牙修复完成后立即进行临床评估,并在第 3、6 和 12 个月时按照以下标准进行评估:解剖形态、边缘适应性、表面粗糙度、边缘色素沉着、颜色匹配、继发龋和接触点。对牙龈指数(GI)、出血指数(考威尔修正值;mBI)和咬合力(BF)进行测量。在 3 个月的随访中,接受聚乳酸柱的患者的咬合力(BF)高于基线值;相比之下,GI 和 mBI 分数较低(P < 0.05)。这种趋势在修复 6 个月和 12 个月后更为明显。使用 PLA 牙冠修复体后,副作用或症状(根尖炎、牙颈部骨折、牙冠松动)的发生率明显低于使用 GFP 牙冠修复体后(p < 0.05)。在颜色匹配、解剖形态、边缘适应性、边缘色素沉着、表面粗糙度、咬合接触和继发龋方面,两组之间没有统计学意义上的明显差异。根据研究结果,在幼儿残余前牙冠上应用聚乳酸根管针和氰基丙烯酸酯可以改善其牙龈健康,减少副作用,增加修复成功的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The purpose of The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry is to provide clinically relevant information to enable the practicing dentist to have access to the state of the art in pediatric dentistry. From prevention, to information, to the management of different problems encountered in children''s related medical and dental problems, this peer-reviewed journal keeps you abreast of the latest news and developments related to pediatric dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信