Dental versus zygomatic implants in the treatment of maxillectomy: a finite element analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
İkbal Leblebicioğlu Kurtuluş, Duygu Kilic, Kerem Kilic
{"title":"Dental versus zygomatic implants in the treatment of maxillectomy: a finite element analysis.","authors":"İkbal Leblebicioğlu Kurtuluş, Duygu Kilic, Kerem Kilic","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00008R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study analyzed the stress distributions on zygomatic and dental implants placed in the zygomatic bone, supporting bones, and superstructures under occlusal loads after maxillary reconstruction with obturator prostheses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>12 scenarios of three-dimensional finite element models were constructed based on computed tomography scans of a patient who had hemimaxillectomy. Two obturator prostheses were analyzed for each model. A total force of 600 N was applied from the palatal to buccal bones at an angle of 45°. The maximum and minimum principal stress values for bone and also the von Misses stress values for dental implants and prostheses were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When zygomatic implants were applied to the defect area, the maximum principal stresses were similar in intensity to the other models; however, the minimum principal stress values were higher than in scenarios without zygomatic implants. In models that used zygomatic implants in the defect area, von Misses stress levels were significantly higher in zygomatic implants than in dental implants. In scenarios where the prosthesis was supported by tissue in the non-defect area, the maximum and minimum principal stress values on cortical bone were higher than in scenarios where implants were applied to both defect and non-defect areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients who lack an alveolar crest after maxillectomy, reduced stress on the zygomatic bone is expected if a custom bar-retained prosthesis is placed on the dental implant. The stress was higher on zygomatic implants without alveolar crest support than on dental implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":50101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00008R2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzed the stress distributions on zygomatic and dental implants placed in the zygomatic bone, supporting bones, and superstructures under occlusal loads after maxillary reconstruction with obturator prostheses.

Materials and methods: 12 scenarios of three-dimensional finite element models were constructed based on computed tomography scans of a patient who had hemimaxillectomy. Two obturator prostheses were analyzed for each model. A total force of 600 N was applied from the palatal to buccal bones at an angle of 45°. The maximum and minimum principal stress values for bone and also the von Misses stress values for dental implants and prostheses were calculated.

Results: When zygomatic implants were applied to the defect area, the maximum principal stresses were similar in intensity to the other models; however, the minimum principal stress values were higher than in scenarios without zygomatic implants. In models that used zygomatic implants in the defect area, von Misses stress levels were significantly higher in zygomatic implants than in dental implants. In scenarios where the prosthesis was supported by tissue in the non-defect area, the maximum and minimum principal stress values on cortical bone were higher than in scenarios where implants were applied to both defect and non-defect areas.

Conclusions: In patients who lack an alveolar crest after maxillectomy, reduced stress on the zygomatic bone is expected if a custom bar-retained prosthesis is placed on the dental implant. The stress was higher on zygomatic implants without alveolar crest support than on dental implants.

牙科与颧骨种植体在上颌骨切除术治疗中的对比:有限元分析。
目的:本研究分析了在上颌重建中使用钝器假体后,在咬合负荷下颧骨和牙种植体在颧骨、支撑骨和上部结构上的应力分布。材料和方法:根据一名半颌切除术患者的计算机断层扫描图像,构建了 12 种三维有限元模型。每个模型分析了两个闭锁器假体。以 45° 角从腭骨向颊骨施加总重 600 N 的力。计算了骨的最大和最小主应力值,以及种植体和修复体的 von Misses 应力值:结果:在缺损区使用颧骨种植体时,最大主应力的强度与其他模型相似;但最小主应力值高于未使用颧骨种植体的情况。在缺损区使用颧骨种植体的模型中,颧骨种植体的 von Misses 应力水平明显高于牙科种植体。在假体由非缺损区组织支撑的情况下,皮质骨的最大和最小主应力值要高于缺损区和非缺损区都使用种植体的情况:结论:对于上颌骨切除术后缺少牙槽嵴的患者,如果在种植体上安装定制的杆固位修复体,预计颧骨上的应力会减少。与牙科种植体相比,没有牙槽嵴支撑的颧骨种植体受到的压力更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral Implantology
Journal of Oral Implantology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication of the American Academy of Implant Dentistry and of the American Academy of Implant Prosthodontics, is dedicated to providing valuable information to general dentists, oral surgeons, prosthodontists, periodontists, scientists, clinicians, laboratory owners and technicians, manufacturers, and educators. Implant basics, prosthetics, pharmaceuticals, the latest research in implantology, implant surgery, and advanced implant procedures are just some of the topics covered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信