Assessment for Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Using Vessel Wall Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Multireader ROC Study to Determine Optimal Sequence for Detecting Vessel Wall Calcification.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1159/000538175
Hideki Ishimaru, Yohei Ikebe, Tsuyoshi Izumo, Hiroshi Imai, Minoru Morikawa, Reiko Ideguchi, Ayano Ishiyama, Hirofumi Koike, Masataka Uetani, Ryo Toya
{"title":"Assessment for Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Using Vessel Wall Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Multireader ROC Study to Determine Optimal Sequence for Detecting Vessel Wall Calcification.","authors":"Hideki Ishimaru, Yohei Ikebe, Tsuyoshi Izumo, Hiroshi Imai, Minoru Morikawa, Reiko Ideguchi, Ayano Ishiyama, Hirofumi Koike, Masataka Uetani, Ryo Toya","doi":"10.1159/000538175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to compare conventional vessel wall MR imaging techniques and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) to determine the optimal sequence for detecting carotid artery calcification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two patients who underwent carotid vessel wall MR imaging and neck CT were enrolled. Four slices of 6-mm sections from the bilateral internal carotid bifurcation were subdivided into 4 segments according to clock position (0-3, 3-6, 6-9, and 9-12) and assessed for calcification. Two blinded radiologists independently reviewed a total of 704 segments and scored the likelihood of calcification using a 5-point scale on spin-echo imaging, FLASH, and QSM. The observer performance for detecting calcification was evaluated by a multireader, multiple-case receiver operating characteristic study. Weighted κ statistics were calculated to assess interobserver agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>QSM had a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85, which was significantly higher than that of any other sequence (p &lt; 0.01) and showed substantial interreader agreement (κ = 0.68). A segment with a score of 3-5 was defined as positive, and a segment with a score of 1-2 was defined as negative; the sensitivity and specificity of QSM were 0.75 and 0.87, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QSM was the most reliable MR sequence for the detection of plaque calcification.</p>","PeriodicalId":17530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Research","volume":" ","pages":"122-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to compare conventional vessel wall MR imaging techniques and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) to determine the optimal sequence for detecting carotid artery calcification.

Methods: Twenty-two patients who underwent carotid vessel wall MR imaging and neck CT were enrolled. Four slices of 6-mm sections from the bilateral internal carotid bifurcation were subdivided into 4 segments according to clock position (0-3, 3-6, 6-9, and 9-12) and assessed for calcification. Two blinded radiologists independently reviewed a total of 704 segments and scored the likelihood of calcification using a 5-point scale on spin-echo imaging, FLASH, and QSM. The observer performance for detecting calcification was evaluated by a multireader, multiple-case receiver operating characteristic study. Weighted κ statistics were calculated to assess interobserver agreement.

Results: QSM had a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85, which was significantly higher than that of any other sequence (p < 0.01) and showed substantial interreader agreement (κ = 0.68). A segment with a score of 3-5 was defined as positive, and a segment with a score of 1-2 was defined as negative; the sensitivity and specificity of QSM were 0.75 and 0.87, respectively.

Conclusion: QSM was the most reliable MR sequence for the detection of plaque calcification.

使用血管壁磁共振成像评估颈动脉粥样硬化斑块:确定检测血管壁钙化最佳序列的多机 ROC 研究。
简介:我们的目的是比较传统血管壁磁共振成像技术和定量易感性绘图(QSM):我们旨在比较传统的血管壁磁共振成像技术和定量易感性图谱(QSM),以确定检测颈动脉钙化的最佳序列:22名患者接受了颈动脉血管壁磁共振成像和颈部CT检查。根据时钟位置(0-3、3-6、6-9 和 9-12)将双侧颈内动脉分叉处的四张 6 毫米切片细分为 4 个区段,并评估钙化情况。两名盲放射科医生独立检查了总共 704 个节段,并使用自旋回波成像、FLASH 和 QSM 的 5 点评分法对钙化的可能性进行评分。通过多阅读器、多病例接收器操作特征研究评估了观察者检测钙化的性能。计算加权κ统计量以评估观察者之间的一致性:QSM的接收器操作特征曲线下的平均面积为0.85,明显高于其他序列(p <0.01),并显示出很大的读片者间一致性(κ = 0.68)。得分 3-5 的区段被定义为阳性,得分 1-2 的区段被定义为阴性;QSM 的敏感性和特异性分别为 0.75 和 0.87:结论:QSM 是检测斑块钙化最可靠的 MR 序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Research
Journal of Vascular Research 医学-生理学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''Journal of Vascular Research'' publishes original articles and reviews of scientific excellence in vascular and microvascular biology, physiology and pathophysiology. The scope of the journal covers a broad spectrum of vascular and lymphatic research, including vascular structure, vascular function, haemodynamics, mechanics, cell signalling, intercellular communication, growth and differentiation. JVR''s ''Vascular Update'' series regularly presents state-of-the-art reviews on hot topics in vascular biology. Manuscript processing times are, consistent with stringent review, kept as short as possible due to electronic submission. All articles are published online first, ensuring rapid publication. The ''Journal of Vascular Research'' is the official journal of the European Society for Microcirculation. A biennial prize is awarded to the authors of the best paper published in the journal over the previous two years, thus encouraging young scientists working in the exciting field of vascular biology to publish their findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信