Evidence-based recommendations for the rehabilitation and management of the ageing population with spinal cord injury: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Vanessa Seijas, Lorena Schrepfer, Ana M Posada, María A Spir, Barbara Machado, Diana Sigrist-Nix, Anke Scheel-Sailer, Inge Eriks-Hoogland, Carla Sabariego
{"title":"Evidence-based recommendations for the rehabilitation and management of the ageing population with spinal cord injury: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.","authors":"Vanessa Seijas, Lorena Schrepfer, Ana M Posada, María A Spir, Barbara Machado, Diana Sigrist-Nix, Anke Scheel-Sailer, Inge Eriks-Hoogland, Carla Sabariego","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08244-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The intersection of ageing and spinal cord injury (SCI) is of global concern. Two scenarios have been described: 1) \"SCI with ageing,\" an increase in the average age of SCI onset, and 2) \"ageing with SCI,\" an increase in post-injury life expectancy. These scenarios entail complex health care and rehabilitation needs due to the accumulation of comorbidities, ageing-related and SCI-induced physiological changes, and post-SCI secondary health conditions. We systematically reviewed Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) with the objective of identifying the extent to which SCI CPGs include recommendations for the rehabilitation and management of people who are \"ageing with SCI\" or who have acquired an \"SCI with ageing\". We termed these as \"ageing-related recommendations\". We also aimed to describe them and identify gaps.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We searched PubMed (NCBI), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost) and Embase (Elsevier) for relevant CPGs between 28 December 2022 and 5 January 2023. Included CPGs were evidence-based and had at least one ageing-related recommendation for SCI rehabilitation and management. We used the two core sets of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to identify gaps.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Only 16 (30%) of the 52 identified CPGs included ageing-related recommendations. Most were recent US or European publications and lacked specific chapters on ageing. These CPGs included 40 ageing-related recommendations, mostly \"strong\" but based on \"low\" to \"very low\" quality of evidence. The overall quality of the development process was low and did not consider the values and preferences of stakeholders and patients. Common topics included cardiovascular, bone, metabolic, bowel, bladder, and skin health. The recommendations could be linked to 30 ICF categories which represented only 18% of the ICF categories included in the comprehensive versions of two ICF Core Sets. Key gaps were found in mobility, interpersonal interactions, and relationships, neuromusculoskeletal and movement-related, mental, sensory and pain functions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a notable lack of high-quality ageing-related recommendations for SCI management and rehabilitation. Future research should prioritize the generation of high-quality evidence to develop age-sensitive CPGs. Future SCI CPGs need to address the complex challenges at the interface of ageing and SCI, considering patient and stakeholder preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":12044,"journal":{"name":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":"433-444"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11255876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08244-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The intersection of ageing and spinal cord injury (SCI) is of global concern. Two scenarios have been described: 1) "SCI with ageing," an increase in the average age of SCI onset, and 2) "ageing with SCI," an increase in post-injury life expectancy. These scenarios entail complex health care and rehabilitation needs due to the accumulation of comorbidities, ageing-related and SCI-induced physiological changes, and post-SCI secondary health conditions. We systematically reviewed Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) with the objective of identifying the extent to which SCI CPGs include recommendations for the rehabilitation and management of people who are "ageing with SCI" or who have acquired an "SCI with ageing". We termed these as "ageing-related recommendations". We also aimed to describe them and identify gaps.

Evidence acquisition: We searched PubMed (NCBI), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost) and Embase (Elsevier) for relevant CPGs between 28 December 2022 and 5 January 2023. Included CPGs were evidence-based and had at least one ageing-related recommendation for SCI rehabilitation and management. We used the two core sets of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to identify gaps.

Evidence synthesis: Only 16 (30%) of the 52 identified CPGs included ageing-related recommendations. Most were recent US or European publications and lacked specific chapters on ageing. These CPGs included 40 ageing-related recommendations, mostly "strong" but based on "low" to "very low" quality of evidence. The overall quality of the development process was low and did not consider the values and preferences of stakeholders and patients. Common topics included cardiovascular, bone, metabolic, bowel, bladder, and skin health. The recommendations could be linked to 30 ICF categories which represented only 18% of the ICF categories included in the comprehensive versions of two ICF Core Sets. Key gaps were found in mobility, interpersonal interactions, and relationships, neuromusculoskeletal and movement-related, mental, sensory and pain functions.

Conclusions: There is a notable lack of high-quality ageing-related recommendations for SCI management and rehabilitation. Future research should prioritize the generation of high-quality evidence to develop age-sensitive CPGs. Future SCI CPGs need to address the complex challenges at the interface of ageing and SCI, considering patient and stakeholder preferences.

以证据为基础的脊髓损伤老龄人口康复和管理建议:临床实践指南系统回顾。
导言:老龄化与脊髓损伤(SCI)的交叉问题是全球关注的焦点。人们描述了两种情况:1)"脊髓损伤与老龄化",即脊髓损伤发病的平均年龄增加;2)"脊髓损伤与老龄化",即受伤后预期寿命延长。由于合并症的累积、与老龄化相关和 SCI 引起的生理变化以及 SCI 后的继发性健康问题,这些情况会导致复杂的医疗保健和康复需求。我们系统地审查了临床实践指南(CPG),旨在确定 SCI CPG 在多大程度上包含了针对 "因 SCI 而老化 "或 "因老化而获得 SCI "的人群的康复和管理建议。我们将其称为 "与老龄化相关的建议"。我们还旨在描述这些建议并找出差距:我们在 2022 年 12 月 28 日至 2023 年 1 月 5 日期间检索了 PubMed (NCBI)、CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost) 和 Embase (Elsevier),以查找相关的 CPG。纳入的 CPG 均以证据为基础,至少有一项与老龄化相关的 SCI 康复和管理建议。我们使用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)的两套核心内容来确定差距:在 52 份已确认的 CPG 中,只有 16 份(30%)包含与老龄化相关的建议。大多数都是美国或欧洲的最新出版物,缺乏关于老龄化的专门章节。这些 CPG 包括 40 项与老龄化相关的建议,其中大部分为 "有力 "建议,但基于 "低 "至 "极低 "的证据质量。制定过程的整体质量较低,没有考虑利益相关者和患者的价值观和偏好。常见的主题包括心血管、骨骼、代谢、肠道、膀胱和皮肤健康。建议可与 30 个 ICF 类别相关联,仅占两个 ICF 核心集综合版本中 ICF 类别的 18%。在行动能力、人际交往和关系、神经-肌肉-骨骼和运动相关、精神、感觉和疼痛功能方面发现了主要差距:结论:在 SCI 管理和康复方面,明显缺乏高质量的老龄化相关建议。未来的研究应优先考虑生成高质量的证据,以制定对年龄敏感的 CPG。未来的 SCI CPG 需要解决老龄化和 SCI 交界处的复杂挑战,同时考虑患者和利益相关者的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine publishes papers of clinical interest in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信