M. Rinne, T. Stefański, M. Franco, T. Jalava, K. Kuoppala
{"title":"Forage type and additive effects on fermentation quality and biorefinery performance of silages","authors":"M. Rinne, T. Stefański, M. Franco, T. Jalava, K. Kuoppala","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The concept of a green biorefinery has recently gained interest and can be defined as a process where green biomass is processed to a variety of products. Most green biorefineries rely on fresh green biomass as the feedstock, but using a stable ensiled biomass could provide benefits. We evaluated the effects of silage additive treatments on silage fermentation quality and performance in a laboratory scale liquid–solid separation to simulate the first step of a green biorefinery. In Experiment 1, red clover and fresh and wilted grass were ensiled without additive or treated with a lactic acid bacteria inoculant or a formic acid based additive. In Experiment 2, grass or red clover were treated with a fibrolytic enzyme, formic acid or a combination of them, and a control without additive was also included. Silage fermentation quality was improved by additive use. Biomass dry matter concentration was negatively related to liquid yield, but effects of additive treatments on the biorefinery performance were minor and inconsistent between different forages. Optimizing agronomic and feedstock conservation management plays an important role for the success and sustainability of the biorefinery process. Good silage management practices with minimal losses during storage should be targeted, but no clear patterns in biorefinery outputs were observed in the current study when different types of additives were used in grass and clover silage production.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.12671","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12671","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The concept of a green biorefinery has recently gained interest and can be defined as a process where green biomass is processed to a variety of products. Most green biorefineries rely on fresh green biomass as the feedstock, but using a stable ensiled biomass could provide benefits. We evaluated the effects of silage additive treatments on silage fermentation quality and performance in a laboratory scale liquid–solid separation to simulate the first step of a green biorefinery. In Experiment 1, red clover and fresh and wilted grass were ensiled without additive or treated with a lactic acid bacteria inoculant or a formic acid based additive. In Experiment 2, grass or red clover were treated with a fibrolytic enzyme, formic acid or a combination of them, and a control without additive was also included. Silage fermentation quality was improved by additive use. Biomass dry matter concentration was negatively related to liquid yield, but effects of additive treatments on the biorefinery performance were minor and inconsistent between different forages. Optimizing agronomic and feedstock conservation management plays an important role for the success and sustainability of the biorefinery process. Good silage management practices with minimal losses during storage should be targeted, but no clear patterns in biorefinery outputs were observed in the current study when different types of additives were used in grass and clover silage production.
期刊介绍:
Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.