Forage type and additive effects on fermentation quality and biorefinery performance of silages

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
M. Rinne, T. Stefański, M. Franco, T. Jalava, K. Kuoppala
{"title":"Forage type and additive effects on fermentation quality and biorefinery performance of silages","authors":"M. Rinne,&nbsp;T. Stefański,&nbsp;M. Franco,&nbsp;T. Jalava,&nbsp;K. Kuoppala","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The concept of a green biorefinery has recently gained interest and can be defined as a process where green biomass is processed to a variety of products. Most green biorefineries rely on fresh green biomass as the feedstock, but using a stable ensiled biomass could provide benefits. We evaluated the effects of silage additive treatments on silage fermentation quality and performance in a laboratory scale liquid–solid separation to simulate the first step of a green biorefinery. In Experiment 1, red clover and fresh and wilted grass were ensiled without additive or treated with a lactic acid bacteria inoculant or a formic acid based additive. In Experiment 2, grass or red clover were treated with a fibrolytic enzyme, formic acid or a combination of them, and a control without additive was also included. Silage fermentation quality was improved by additive use. Biomass dry matter concentration was negatively related to liquid yield, but effects of additive treatments on the biorefinery performance were minor and inconsistent between different forages. Optimizing agronomic and feedstock conservation management plays an important role for the success and sustainability of the biorefinery process. Good silage management practices with minimal losses during storage should be targeted, but no clear patterns in biorefinery outputs were observed in the current study when different types of additives were used in grass and clover silage production.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.12671","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12671","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of a green biorefinery has recently gained interest and can be defined as a process where green biomass is processed to a variety of products. Most green biorefineries rely on fresh green biomass as the feedstock, but using a stable ensiled biomass could provide benefits. We evaluated the effects of silage additive treatments on silage fermentation quality and performance in a laboratory scale liquid–solid separation to simulate the first step of a green biorefinery. In Experiment 1, red clover and fresh and wilted grass were ensiled without additive or treated with a lactic acid bacteria inoculant or a formic acid based additive. In Experiment 2, grass or red clover were treated with a fibrolytic enzyme, formic acid or a combination of them, and a control without additive was also included. Silage fermentation quality was improved by additive use. Biomass dry matter concentration was negatively related to liquid yield, but effects of additive treatments on the biorefinery performance were minor and inconsistent between different forages. Optimizing agronomic and feedstock conservation management plays an important role for the success and sustainability of the biorefinery process. Good silage management practices with minimal losses during storage should be targeted, but no clear patterns in biorefinery outputs were observed in the current study when different types of additives were used in grass and clover silage production.

饲草类型和添加剂对青贮饲料发酵质量和生物精炼性能的影响
绿色生物精炼厂的概念最近引起了人们的兴趣,它可以定义为将绿色生物质加工成各种产品的过程。大多数绿色生物炼制厂依靠新鲜的绿色生物质作为原料,但使用稳定的腐熟生物质也能带来好处。我们在实验室规模的液固分离中评估了青贮添加剂处理对青贮发酵质量和性能的影响,以模拟绿色生物精炼厂的第一步。在实验 1 中,红三叶草和新鲜枯萎的青草未经添加剂或经乳酸菌接种剂或甲酸基添加剂处理后进行青贮。在实验 2 中,用纤维分解酶、甲酸或它们的组合处理青草或红三叶草,同时还包括不加添加剂的对照组。使用添加剂提高了青贮发酵质量。生物质干物质浓度与液体产量呈负相关,但添加剂处理对生物炼制性能的影响较小,且不同牧草之间的影响不一致。优化农艺和原料保护管理对生物精炼过程的成功和可持续性起着重要作用。在当前的研究中,当在青草和苜蓿青贮生产中使用不同类型的添加剂时,没有观察到生物精炼产出的明显模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信