Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the left primary motor cortex area on hand grip strength and dexterity in healthy individuals: A double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sharareh Roshanzamir , Tayebeh Sadat Salehi Rihani , Afsaneh Dadarkhah
{"title":"Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the left primary motor cortex area on hand grip strength and dexterity in healthy individuals: A double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial","authors":"Sharareh Roshanzamir ,&nbsp;Tayebeh Sadat Salehi Rihani ,&nbsp;Afsaneh Dadarkhah","doi":"10.1016/j.neucli.2024.102959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>Motor function plays a critical role in everyday activities, from basic self-care tasks to complex activities that require precision and dexterity. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on grip strength and hand dexterity in healthy individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We conducted a double-blind randomized clinical trial with two groups of sham and active tDCS. The anode was fixed over the primary motor cortex area M1 on the C3 point. The primary outcome was hand grip strength measured by a dynamometer and the secondary outcomes were hand dexterity and assembly assessed by the Purdue Pegboard test. The tDCS program was administered at rest three and two times for the first and second week for a total of five sessions of 20 min each.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no significant improvement in the mean difference in grip strength between the sham (<em>N</em> = 27) and active (<em>N</em> = 27) tDCS groups (1.7 vs. 2.3, Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test, <em>P</em> = 0.869, <em>d</em> = 0.02). Participants who received active tDCS showed subtle improvements in right-hand dexterity (0.6 vs. 1.3, <em>U</em> test <em>P</em> = 0.017, <em>d</em> = 0.33) and overall manual dexterity (1.4 vs. 3.2, <em>U</em> test <em>P</em> = 0.023, <em>d</em> = 0.31) compared with the sham group. Other comparisons for hand dexterity and assembly (motor coordination and fine skills during the manipulation of small objects) between the two groups were not significant. We did not find any adverse effects of sham or active tDCS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study showed a potential for clinical improvement in hand dexterity after five sessions of tDCS in healthy individuals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19134,"journal":{"name":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"54 4","pages":"Article 102959"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705324000170","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Motor function plays a critical role in everyday activities, from basic self-care tasks to complex activities that require precision and dexterity. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on grip strength and hand dexterity in healthy individuals.

Method

We conducted a double-blind randomized clinical trial with two groups of sham and active tDCS. The anode was fixed over the primary motor cortex area M1 on the C3 point. The primary outcome was hand grip strength measured by a dynamometer and the secondary outcomes were hand dexterity and assembly assessed by the Purdue Pegboard test. The tDCS program was administered at rest three and two times for the first and second week for a total of five sessions of 20 min each.

Results

There was no significant improvement in the mean difference in grip strength between the sham (N = 27) and active (N = 27) tDCS groups (1.7 vs. 2.3, Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.869, d = 0.02). Participants who received active tDCS showed subtle improvements in right-hand dexterity (0.6 vs. 1.3, U test P = 0.017, d = 0.33) and overall manual dexterity (1.4 vs. 3.2, U test P = 0.023, d = 0.31) compared with the sham group. Other comparisons for hand dexterity and assembly (motor coordination and fine skills during the manipulation of small objects) between the two groups were not significant. We did not find any adverse effects of sham or active tDCS.

Conclusion

Our study showed a potential for clinical improvement in hand dexterity after five sessions of tDCS in healthy individuals.

经颅直流电刺激左侧初级运动皮层区对健康人手部握力和灵活性的影响:双盲随机假对照试验
背景和目的运动功能在日常活动中起着至关重要的作用,从基本的自理任务到需要精确性和灵活性的复杂活动,无一例外。本研究旨在探讨经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对健康人握力和手部灵活性的影响。方法我们进行了一项双盲随机临床试验,分为假性和活性 tDCS 两组。阳极固定在初级运动皮层 M1 区的 C3 点上。主要结果是通过测力计测量的手部握力,次要结果是通过普渡钉板测试评估的手部灵活性和组装能力。结果假性组(27 人)和活性组(27 人)的平均握力差异没有显著改善(1.7 vs. 2.3,Mann-Whitney U 检验,P = 0.869,d = 0.02)。与假体组相比,接受主动 tDCS 治疗的参与者在右手灵活性(0.6 vs. 1.3,U 检验 P = 0.017,d = 0.33)和整体手部灵活性(1.4 vs. 3.2,U 检验 P = 0.023,d = 0.31)方面均有细微改善。两组之间在手部灵活性和装配(操作小物体时的运动协调和精细技能)方面的其他比较差异不显著。结论:我们的研究表明,对健康人进行五个疗程的 tDCS 治疗后,手部灵活性有可能得到临床改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
55
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurophysiologie Clinique / Clinical Neurophysiology (NCCN) is the official organ of the French Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SNCLF). This journal is published 6 times a year, and is aimed at an international readership, with articles written in English. These can take the form of original research papers, comprehensive review articles, viewpoints, short communications, technical notes, editorials or letters to the Editor. The theme is the neurophysiological investigation of central or peripheral nervous system or muscle in healthy humans or patients. The journal focuses on key areas of clinical neurophysiology: electro- or magneto-encephalography, evoked potentials of all modalities, electroneuromyography, sleep, pain, posture, balance, motor control, autonomic nervous system, cognition, invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation, signal processing, bio-engineering, functional imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信