Association between problematic social networking site use and social well-being among young adults: A systematic review

Q3 Psychology
K. Hylkilä , N. Männikkö , A. Peltonen , S. Castrén , T. Mustonen , J. Konttila , M. Männistö , M. Kääriäinen
{"title":"Association between problematic social networking site use and social well-being among young adults: A systematic review","authors":"K. Hylkilä ,&nbsp;N. Männikkö ,&nbsp;A. Peltonen ,&nbsp;S. Castrén ,&nbsp;T. Mustonen ,&nbsp;J. Konttila ,&nbsp;M. Männistö ,&nbsp;M. Kääriäinen","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This systematic review aimed to synthesize current evidence of an association between problematic social networking site use (PSNSU) and social well-being and predictors of PSNSU among young adults (18–35 years).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The systematic review considered cross-sectional and cohort studies that assessed the association between PSNSU and social well-being among young adults. The JBI systematic review methodology of etiology and risk was followed. Data were collected from eight electronic databases and manually from reference lists of selected studies. Two independent reviewers selected studies by screening titles, abstracts and full texts and assessed the quality of the included studies. Data were extracted and synthesized with narrative methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty one (<em>n</em> = 21) studies were included in the final review. The results showed that there were associations between PSNSU and different social well-being factors, e.g., associations were found between PSNSU and social and parasocial relationships on social networking sites and social media anxiety. Also some predictive factors were found.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Although, the search strategies were developed in conjunction with an information specialist, some keywords might have been missed, which could have affected the search results. Social well-being and PSNS use can be defined in many ways, which may have affected which studies were excluded. Language limitations might affect to the study inclusion.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In most cases, PSNSU was associated with lower social well-being, although some mixed results were obtained. Definitions of PSNSU and social well-being varied widely. Therefore, in the future, it would be beneficial to have clear concepts for PSNSU and social well-being. It is also important to consider social aspects in PSNSU.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100775"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324000611/pdfft?md5=edca39993b0334a9fe2ee80770eafb91&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324000611-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324000611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This systematic review aimed to synthesize current evidence of an association between problematic social networking site use (PSNSU) and social well-being and predictors of PSNSU among young adults (18–35 years).

Methods

The systematic review considered cross-sectional and cohort studies that assessed the association between PSNSU and social well-being among young adults. The JBI systematic review methodology of etiology and risk was followed. Data were collected from eight electronic databases and manually from reference lists of selected studies. Two independent reviewers selected studies by screening titles, abstracts and full texts and assessed the quality of the included studies. Data were extracted and synthesized with narrative methods.

Results

Twenty one (n = 21) studies were included in the final review. The results showed that there were associations between PSNSU and different social well-being factors, e.g., associations were found between PSNSU and social and parasocial relationships on social networking sites and social media anxiety. Also some predictive factors were found.

Limitations

Although, the search strategies were developed in conjunction with an information specialist, some keywords might have been missed, which could have affected the search results. Social well-being and PSNS use can be defined in many ways, which may have affected which studies were excluded. Language limitations might affect to the study inclusion.

Conclusions

In most cases, PSNSU was associated with lower social well-being, although some mixed results were obtained. Definitions of PSNSU and social well-being varied widely. Therefore, in the future, it would be beneficial to have clear concepts for PSNSU and social well-being. It is also important to consider social aspects in PSNSU.

年轻人使用问题社交网站与社会福祉之间的关系:系统回顾
背景本系统综述旨在综合目前有关问题社交网站使用(PSNSU)与社会福利之间的关系以及年轻人(18-35 岁)使用 PSNSU 的预测因素的证据。方法本系统综述考虑了评估年轻人使用 PSNSU 与社会福利之间关系的横断面研究和队列研究。研究采用了 JBI 病因和风险系统综述方法。研究数据来自八个电子数据库,并通过人工方式从所选研究的参考文献列表中收集。两位独立审稿人通过筛选标题、摘要和全文来筛选研究,并对纳入研究的质量进行评估。结果最终纳入了 21 项研究。结果显示,PSNSU 与不同的社会福利因素之间存在关联,例如,PSNSU 与社交网站上的社会关系和寄生社会关系以及社交媒体焦虑之间存在关联。局限性虽然搜索策略是与信息专家共同制定的,但可能会遗漏一些关键词,从而影响搜索结果。社会福利和 PSNS 的使用可以有多种定义,这可能会影响到哪些研究被排除在外。结论 在大多数情况下,PSNSU 与较低的社会福利相关,但也有一些结果不一。PSNSU 和社会福利的定义差异很大。因此,今后对 PSNSU 和社会福利有明确的概念将是有益的。在 PSNSU 中考虑社会因素也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信