A comparative study on antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolates from Austrian patients and wastewater-influenced Danube River water and biofilms

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Melanie Leopold , Angelika Kabicher , Ildiko-Julia Pap , Barbara Ströbele , Gernot Zarfel , Andreas H. Farnleitner , Alexander K.T. Kirschner
{"title":"A comparative study on antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolates from Austrian patients and wastewater-influenced Danube River water and biofilms","authors":"Melanie Leopold ,&nbsp;Angelika Kabicher ,&nbsp;Ildiko-Julia Pap ,&nbsp;Barbara Ströbele ,&nbsp;Gernot Zarfel ,&nbsp;Andreas H. Farnleitner ,&nbsp;Alexander K.T. Kirschner","doi":"10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a major threat to human health worldwide. AMR can be introduced into natural aquatic ecosystems, for example, from clinical facilities via wastewater emissions. Understanding AMR patterns in environmental populations of bacterial pathogens is important to elucidate propagation routes and develop mitigation strategies. In this study, AMR patterns of <em>Escherichia coli</em> isolates from urinary tract infections and colonised urinary catheters of inpatients and outpatients were compared to isolates from the Danube River within the same catchment in Austria to potentially link environmental with clinical resistance patterns. Susceptibility to 20 antibiotics was tested for 697 patient, 489 water and 440 biofilm isolates. The resistance ratios in patient isolates were significantly higher than in the environmental isolates and higher resistance ratios were found in biofilm in comparison to water isolates. The role of the biofilm as potential sink of resistances was reflected by two extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing isolates in the biofilm while none were found in water, and by higher amoxicillin/clavulanic acid resistance ratios in biofilm compared to patient isolates. Although, resistances to last-line antibiotics such as carbapenems and tigecycline were found in the patient and in the environmental isolates, they still occurred at low frequency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13994,"journal":{"name":"International journal of hygiene and environmental health","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 114361"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438463924000427/pdfft?md5=618b3c046e2165075e9b10ae83d4ad0f&pid=1-s2.0-S1438463924000427-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of hygiene and environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438463924000427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a major threat to human health worldwide. AMR can be introduced into natural aquatic ecosystems, for example, from clinical facilities via wastewater emissions. Understanding AMR patterns in environmental populations of bacterial pathogens is important to elucidate propagation routes and develop mitigation strategies. In this study, AMR patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from urinary tract infections and colonised urinary catheters of inpatients and outpatients were compared to isolates from the Danube River within the same catchment in Austria to potentially link environmental with clinical resistance patterns. Susceptibility to 20 antibiotics was tested for 697 patient, 489 water and 440 biofilm isolates. The resistance ratios in patient isolates were significantly higher than in the environmental isolates and higher resistance ratios were found in biofilm in comparison to water isolates. The role of the biofilm as potential sink of resistances was reflected by two extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing isolates in the biofilm while none were found in water, and by higher amoxicillin/clavulanic acid resistance ratios in biofilm compared to patient isolates. Although, resistances to last-line antibiotics such as carbapenems and tigecycline were found in the patient and in the environmental isolates, they still occurred at low frequency.

Abstract Image

关于从奥地利病人和受废水影响的多瑙河水及生物膜中分离出的耐抗生素大肠埃希菌的比较研究
抗菌药耐药性(AMR)对全球人类健康构成重大威胁。AMR 可以通过废水排放等途径从临床设施引入自然水生生态系统。了解细菌病原体环境种群的 AMR 模式对于阐明传播途径和制定缓解策略非常重要。在这项研究中,我们将从住院病人和门诊病人的尿路感染和定植导尿管中分离出的大肠埃希菌的AMR模式与从奥地利同一集水区的多瑙河中分离出的大肠埃希菌的AMR模式进行了比较,以便将环境耐药模式与临床耐药模式联系起来。对 697 例病人、489 例水和 440 例生物膜分离物进行了 20 种抗生素敏感性测试。患者分离物的耐药性比率明显高于环境分离物,与水分离物相比,生物膜的耐药性比率更高。生物膜作为潜在的耐药性汇的作用体现在生物膜中有两个产生广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的分离物,而在水中却没有发现;生物膜中的阿莫西林/克拉维酸耐药性比率高于患者分离物。虽然在患者和环境分离物中发现了对碳青霉烯类和替加环素等最后一线抗生素的耐药性,但发生频率仍然很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health serves as a multidisciplinary forum for original reports on exposure assessment and the reactions to and consequences of human exposure to the biological, chemical, and physical environment. Research reports, short communications, reviews, scientific comments, technical notes, and editorials will be peer-reviewed before acceptance for publication. Priority will be given to articles on epidemiological aspects of environmental toxicology, health risk assessments, susceptible (sub) populations, sanitation and clean water, human biomonitoring, environmental medicine, and public health aspects of exposure-related outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信