Color matching and color recovery in large composite restorations using single-shade or universal composites.

Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2024-03-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202405665
Ellen Dionélia Alencar Rodrigues Rosa, Larissa Fernandes Vieira Da Silva, Paula Fernanda Damasceno Silva, André Luís Faria E Silva
{"title":"Color matching and color recovery in large composite restorations using single-shade or universal composites.","authors":"Ellen Dionélia Alencar Rodrigues Rosa, Larissa Fernandes Vieira Da Silva, Paula Fernanda Damasceno Silva, André Luís Faria E Silva","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202405665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed the color-matching ability and color recovery of unprepared teeth when using single-shade composites and a universal composite in large restorations. Buccal and palatine surface colors of molars were measured with a spectrophotometer (CIELAB) before preparing round cavities (6 mm in diameter, 2 mm in depth). The cavities were randomly filled with a single-shade composite (Omnichroma, Diamond One, or Vittra APS Unique) or a universal composite (Filtek Universal). Color measurements of the restored cavities were taken, and overall color differences (ΔEab and ΔE00) and differences in the whitening index for dentistry (ΔWID) from baseline were calculated. Additionally, visual assessments of a color match to the surrounding enamel were performed by forty evaluators (laypersons and undergraduate students of dentistry) in a viewing booth under illuminant D65, with rating scores from 0 (no color mismatch) to 4 (not acceptable). Data were analyzed using RM or one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Results showed that the restorations generally exhibited whiter colors (WID ranged from 27.9 to 41.3) than the unprepared teeth (WID ranged from 15.9 to 19.3). The composite Filtek Universal demonstrated the lowest color discrepancy (ΔWID = 8.6; ΔE00 = 10.8; and ΔE00 = 6.2), and no significant differences were observed among the evaluated single-shade composites. Furthermore, all composites showed similar and adequate color matches to the surrounding enamel. However, it is important to note that despite their ability to match the surrounding enamel reasonably, none of the composites evaluated in large restorations fully recovered the color observed in unprepared teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"e245665"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10976307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202405665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the color-matching ability and color recovery of unprepared teeth when using single-shade composites and a universal composite in large restorations. Buccal and palatine surface colors of molars were measured with a spectrophotometer (CIELAB) before preparing round cavities (6 mm in diameter, 2 mm in depth). The cavities were randomly filled with a single-shade composite (Omnichroma, Diamond One, or Vittra APS Unique) or a universal composite (Filtek Universal). Color measurements of the restored cavities were taken, and overall color differences (ΔEab and ΔE00) and differences in the whitening index for dentistry (ΔWID) from baseline were calculated. Additionally, visual assessments of a color match to the surrounding enamel were performed by forty evaluators (laypersons and undergraduate students of dentistry) in a viewing booth under illuminant D65, with rating scores from 0 (no color mismatch) to 4 (not acceptable). Data were analyzed using RM or one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Results showed that the restorations generally exhibited whiter colors (WID ranged from 27.9 to 41.3) than the unprepared teeth (WID ranged from 15.9 to 19.3). The composite Filtek Universal demonstrated the lowest color discrepancy (ΔWID = 8.6; ΔE00 = 10.8; and ΔE00 = 6.2), and no significant differences were observed among the evaluated single-shade composites. Furthermore, all composites showed similar and adequate color matches to the surrounding enamel. However, it is important to note that despite their ability to match the surrounding enamel reasonably, none of the composites evaluated in large restorations fully recovered the color observed in unprepared teeth.

使用单一色调或通用复合材料的大型复合材料修复体的颜色匹配和颜色恢复。
本研究评估了在大型修复体中使用单色复合材料和通用复合材料时,未经制备的牙齿的颜色匹配能力和颜色恢复情况。在制备圆形牙洞(直径 6 毫米,深度 2 毫米)之前,用分光光度计(CIELAB)测量了臼齿的颊面和腭面颜色。用单色复合材料(Omnichroma、Diamond One 或 Vittra APS Unique)或通用复合材料(Filtek Universal)随机填充龋洞。对修复后的牙洞进行颜色测量,计算整体色差(ΔEab 和 ΔE00)和牙科美白指数(ΔWID)与基线的差异。此外,40 位评估者(非专业人士和牙科专业的本科生)在 D65 照度下的观察室中对与周围珐琅质的颜色匹配度进行了目测评估,评分范围从 0(无颜色不匹配)到 4(不可接受)。数据分析采用 RM 或单向方差分析(α = 0.05)。结果显示,修复体的颜色(WID 从 27.9 到 41.3 不等)普遍比未准备的牙齿(WID 从 15.9 到 19.3 不等)更白。Filtek Universal 复合材料的色差最小(ΔWID = 8.6;ΔE00 = 10.8;ΔE00 = 6.2),而所评估的单色复合材料之间没有明显差异。此外,所有复合材料都与周围的珐琅质显示出相似且充分的颜色匹配。然而,值得注意的是,尽管复合材料能够与周围的珐琅质合理匹配,但在大型修复体中评估的复合材料都不能完全恢复在未准备的牙齿上观察到的颜色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信