Ethnic inequality between Arabs and Jews in Israel in global life satisfaction: A social determinants examination among young adults.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1037/ort0000739
Netta Achdut
{"title":"Ethnic inequality between Arabs and Jews in Israel in global life satisfaction: A social determinants examination among young adults.","authors":"Netta Achdut","doi":"10.1037/ort0000739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Global life satisfaction (GLS), a core construct of subjective well-being, plays a vital role in positive development among young adults. Persistent inequality in subjective well-being across minority versus majority groups is a growing public health concern. However, research evidence on the minority-majority disparity in GLS among representative samples of young adults is scarce. Based on national data from Israel (<i>N</i> = 2,405), this study examines (a) the association of multiple forms of economic (not in education, employment, or training status, subjective socioeconomic status indicators), social-relational (trust, discrimination, loneliness), and environmental determinants (neighborhood conditions) with GLS among young adults from a minority-majority (Israeli Arabs-Israeli Jews) perspective; (b) whether minority-majority disparity in GLS can be explained by differential health returns for the determinants considered across participants from the two groups; (c) whether minority-majority disparities in GLS persist when controlling for these determinants, suggesting the effect of ethnicity per se. Significant disparities in GLS by ethnicity were found, with young Arab adults far less likely to be satisfied or very satisfied with their lives. Hierarchical logistic regression indicated that economic, social-relational, and environmental determinants shape GLS, but these factors do not eliminate the adverse effect of minority status on GLS. While social-relational and environmental factors uniformly affect GLS across minority and majority participants, economic factors were less influential among the Arab minority, suggesting lower health returns for economic resources among young Arab adults. Implications for policies aimed at promoting health equity and social justice are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"532-549"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000739","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global life satisfaction (GLS), a core construct of subjective well-being, plays a vital role in positive development among young adults. Persistent inequality in subjective well-being across minority versus majority groups is a growing public health concern. However, research evidence on the minority-majority disparity in GLS among representative samples of young adults is scarce. Based on national data from Israel (N = 2,405), this study examines (a) the association of multiple forms of economic (not in education, employment, or training status, subjective socioeconomic status indicators), social-relational (trust, discrimination, loneliness), and environmental determinants (neighborhood conditions) with GLS among young adults from a minority-majority (Israeli Arabs-Israeli Jews) perspective; (b) whether minority-majority disparity in GLS can be explained by differential health returns for the determinants considered across participants from the two groups; (c) whether minority-majority disparities in GLS persist when controlling for these determinants, suggesting the effect of ethnicity per se. Significant disparities in GLS by ethnicity were found, with young Arab adults far less likely to be satisfied or very satisfied with their lives. Hierarchical logistic regression indicated that economic, social-relational, and environmental determinants shape GLS, but these factors do not eliminate the adverse effect of minority status on GLS. While social-relational and environmental factors uniformly affect GLS across minority and majority participants, economic factors were less influential among the Arab minority, suggesting lower health returns for economic resources among young Arab adults. Implications for policies aimed at promoting health equity and social justice are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

以色列阿拉伯人和犹太人在全球生活满意度方面的种族不平等:对年轻人社会决定因素的研究。
全球生活满意度(GLS)是主观幸福感的核心结构,在年轻人的积极发展中起着至关重要的作用。少数群体与多数群体在主观幸福感方面的持续不平等是一个日益严重的公共健康问题。然而,在具有代表性的年轻成年人样本中,有关少数群体与多数群体在主观幸福感方面差异的研究证据却很少。本研究以以色列的全国数据(N = 2,405)为基础,从少数群体占多数(以色列阿拉伯人-以色列犹太人)的角度,研究了 (a) 经济(非教育、就业或培训状况、主观社会经济地位指标)、社会关系(信任、歧视、孤独)和环境决定因素(邻里条件)等多种形式与青壮年 GLS 的关联;(b) 少数民族占多数的 GLS 差异是否可以用两组参与者在所考虑的决定因素方面的不同健康回报来解释;(c) 在控制了这些决定因素后,少数民族占多数的 GLS 差异是否会持续存在,从而表明种族本身的影响。研究发现,不同种族在生活满意度方面存在显著差异,阿拉伯裔成年人对自己的生活感到满意或非常满意的可能性要小得多。层次逻辑回归表明,经济、社会关系和环境决定因素影响着满意度,但这些因素并不能消除少数民族身份对满意度的不利影响。虽然社会关系和环境因素对少数群体和多数群体参与者的 GLS 影响一致,但经济因素对阿拉伯少数群体的影响较小,这表明阿拉伯年轻人的经济资源对健康的回报较低。本文讨论了旨在促进健康公平和社会公正的政策的意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry publishes articles that clarify, challenge, or reshape the prevailing understanding of factors in the prevention and correction of injustice and in the sustainable development of a humane and just society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信