How patients experience respect in healthcare: findings from a qualitative study among multicultural women living with HIV.

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Sofia B Fernandez, Alya Ahmad, Mary Catherine Beach, Melissa K Ward, Michele Jean-Gilles, Gladys Ibañez, Robert Ladner, Mary Jo Trepka
{"title":"How patients experience respect in healthcare: findings from a qualitative study among multicultural women living with HIV.","authors":"Sofia B Fernandez, Alya Ahmad, Mary Catherine Beach, Melissa K Ward, Michele Jean-Gilles, Gladys Ibañez, Robert Ladner, Mary Jo Trepka","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01015-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respect is essential to providing high quality healthcare, particularly for groups that are historically marginalized and stigmatized. While ethical principles taught to health professionals focus on patient autonomy as the object of respect for persons, limited studies explore patients' views of respect. The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of a multiculturally diverse group of low-income women living with HIV (WLH) regarding their experience of respect from their medical physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 57 semi-structured interviews conducted at HIV case management sites in South Florida as part of a larger qualitative study that explored practices facilitating retention and adherence in care. Women were eligible to participate if they identified as African American (n = 28), Hispanic/Latina (n = 22), or Haitian (n = 7). They were asked to describe instances when they were treated with respect by their medical physicians. Interviews were conducted by a fluent research interviewer in either English, Spanish, or Haitian Creole, depending on participant's language preference. Transcripts were translated, back-translated and reviewed in entirety for any statements or comments about \"respect.\" After independent coding by 3 investigators, we used a consensual thematic analysis approach to determine themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from this study grouped into two overarching classifications: respect manifested in physicians' orientation towards the patient (i.e., interpersonal behaviors in interactions) and respect in medical professionalism (i.e., clinic procedures and practices). Four main themes emerged regarding respect in provider's orientation towards the patient: being treated as a person, treated as an equal, treated without blame or prejudice, and treated with concern/emotional support. Two main themes emerged regarding respect as evidenced in medical professionalism: physician availability and considerations of privacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest a more robust conception of what 'respect for persons' entails in medical ethics for a diverse group of low-income women living with HIV. Findings have implications for broadening areas of focus of future bioethics education, training, and research to include components of interpersonal relationship development, communication, and clinic procedures. We suggest these areas of training may increase respectful medical care experiences and potentially serve to influence persistent and known social and structural determinants of health through provider interactions and health care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10967177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01015-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Respect is essential to providing high quality healthcare, particularly for groups that are historically marginalized and stigmatized. While ethical principles taught to health professionals focus on patient autonomy as the object of respect for persons, limited studies explore patients' views of respect. The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of a multiculturally diverse group of low-income women living with HIV (WLH) regarding their experience of respect from their medical physicians.

Methods: We analyzed 57 semi-structured interviews conducted at HIV case management sites in South Florida as part of a larger qualitative study that explored practices facilitating retention and adherence in care. Women were eligible to participate if they identified as African American (n = 28), Hispanic/Latina (n = 22), or Haitian (n = 7). They were asked to describe instances when they were treated with respect by their medical physicians. Interviews were conducted by a fluent research interviewer in either English, Spanish, or Haitian Creole, depending on participant's language preference. Transcripts were translated, back-translated and reviewed in entirety for any statements or comments about "respect." After independent coding by 3 investigators, we used a consensual thematic analysis approach to determine themes.

Results: Results from this study grouped into two overarching classifications: respect manifested in physicians' orientation towards the patient (i.e., interpersonal behaviors in interactions) and respect in medical professionalism (i.e., clinic procedures and practices). Four main themes emerged regarding respect in provider's orientation towards the patient: being treated as a person, treated as an equal, treated without blame or prejudice, and treated with concern/emotional support. Two main themes emerged regarding respect as evidenced in medical professionalism: physician availability and considerations of privacy.

Conclusions: Findings suggest a more robust conception of what 'respect for persons' entails in medical ethics for a diverse group of low-income women living with HIV. Findings have implications for broadening areas of focus of future bioethics education, training, and research to include components of interpersonal relationship development, communication, and clinic procedures. We suggest these areas of training may increase respectful medical care experiences and potentially serve to influence persistent and known social and structural determinants of health through provider interactions and health care delivery.

患者如何体验医疗保健中的尊重:对感染艾滋病毒的多元文化女性的定性研究结果。
背景:尊重对于提供高质量的医疗保健服务至关重要,尤其是对于那些在历史上被边缘化和被污名化的群体。虽然向医疗专业人员传授的伦理原则侧重于将患者自主权作为尊重他人的对象,但探讨患者对尊重的看法的研究却十分有限。本研究的目的是探讨低收入女性艾滋病感染者(WLH)这一多元文化群体对医生尊重她们的体验的看法:我们分析了在南佛罗里达州 HIV 病例管理机构进行的 57 次半结构式访谈,这些访谈是一项大型定性研究的一部分,该研究探讨了促进保持和坚持护理的做法。符合条件的女性包括非裔美国人(28 人)、西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人(22 人)或海地人(7 人)。她们被要求描述自己受到医生尊重的情况。访谈由一名流利的研究访谈员以英语、西班牙语或海地克里奥尔语进行,具体语言取决于受试者的语言偏好。访谈记录经过翻译、反译和全文审阅,以查找任何有关 "尊重 "的陈述或评论。经过 3 位调查人员的独立编码后,我们采用了协商一致的主题分析方法来确定主题:本研究的结果分为两大类:尊重体现在医生对病人的态度上(即互动中的人际行为)和尊重体现在医疗专业精神上(即诊疗程序和实践)。在医疗服务提供者对病人的态度中,出现了四个关于尊重的主题:被当作一个人对待、被当作一个平等的人对待、不被指责或偏见对待、被关心/情感支持对待。在医疗专业精神中体现出的尊重方面,出现了两大主题:医生的可用性和对隐私的考虑:研究结果表明,对于不同的低收入女性艾滋病感染者群体而言,"尊重他人 "在医学伦理学中的内涵有了更深刻的认识。研究结果对拓宽未来生命伦理学教育、培训和研究的重点领域,将人际关系发展、沟通和诊疗程序等内容纳入其中具有重要意义。我们认为,这些培训领域可以增加相互尊重的医疗护理体验,并有可能通过医疗服务提供者之间的互动和医疗服务的提供,影响长期存在的、已知的社会和结构性健康决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信