Screen11: validating a screening instrument for voice disorders in accordance with the COSMIN framework.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Sofia Holmqvist-Jämsén, Daniel Fellman, Greta Öhlund Wistbacka, Jonna Kuuskoski, Miia Ruuskanen, Alma Zenger, Jemima Rantanen, Susanna Simberg
{"title":"Screen11: validating a screening instrument for voice disorders in accordance with the COSMIN framework.","authors":"Sofia Holmqvist-Jämsén, Daniel Fellman, Greta Öhlund Wistbacka, Jonna Kuuskoski, Miia Ruuskanen, Alma Zenger, Jemima Rantanen, Susanna Simberg","doi":"10.1080/14015439.2024.2330967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although numerous patient-reported outcome measures have been developed and validated to quantify the impact of voice problems on different aspects of life, to our knowledge no screening instrument exists that specifically captures voice disorders in a retrospective fashion. The aim of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties and diagnostic validity of a retrospective voice screening method, <i>Screen11,</i> according to the COSMIN framework for health-related, patient-reported outcome measures. The items in Screen11 have been used to establish the prevalence of voice disorders in both general and occupation-specific populations in the Nordic countries. However, the instrument has not been validated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The voice patient group (<i>n</i> = 54) in this study comprised of patients from the Turku University Central Hospital phoniatric outpatient clinic seeking help for their voice problems. For these voice patients, we recruited voice-healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 61) who matched in terms of gender, age, and occupation. The participants responded to the Screen11 questionnaire along with the VHI and the VAPP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the initial exploratory factor analysis showed that all the Screen11 items loaded on a common underlying latent factor. Furthermore, Screen11 had high internal consistency (α = .93) and correlated sufficiently with other voice questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicate that Screen11, which screens for possible voice disorders at an early stage, was successfully validated. With respect to its diagnostic validity, the Screen11 sum score is preferable. A threshold of ≥ 15 should be used for differentiating patients with possible voice disorders from those with healthy voices.</p>","PeriodicalId":49903,"journal":{"name":"Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2024.2330967","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although numerous patient-reported outcome measures have been developed and validated to quantify the impact of voice problems on different aspects of life, to our knowledge no screening instrument exists that specifically captures voice disorders in a retrospective fashion. The aim of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties and diagnostic validity of a retrospective voice screening method, Screen11, according to the COSMIN framework for health-related, patient-reported outcome measures. The items in Screen11 have been used to establish the prevalence of voice disorders in both general and occupation-specific populations in the Nordic countries. However, the instrument has not been validated.

Methods: The voice patient group (n = 54) in this study comprised of patients from the Turku University Central Hospital phoniatric outpatient clinic seeking help for their voice problems. For these voice patients, we recruited voice-healthy controls (n = 61) who matched in terms of gender, age, and occupation. The participants responded to the Screen11 questionnaire along with the VHI and the VAPP.

Results: The results of the initial exploratory factor analysis showed that all the Screen11 items loaded on a common underlying latent factor. Furthermore, Screen11 had high internal consistency (α = .93) and correlated sufficiently with other voice questionnaires.

Conclusions: The results indicate that Screen11, which screens for possible voice disorders at an early stage, was successfully validated. With respect to its diagnostic validity, the Screen11 sum score is preferable. A threshold of ≥ 15 should be used for differentiating patients with possible voice disorders from those with healthy voices.

Screen11:根据 COSMIN 框架验证嗓音障碍筛查工具。
目的:尽管已经开发并验证了许多患者报告的结果测量方法来量化嗓音问题对生活各个方面的影响,但据我们所知,目前还没有一种筛查工具能以回顾性的方式专门筛查嗓音疾病。本研究的目的是根据与健康相关的患者报告结果测量的 COSMIN 框架,检查回顾性嗓音筛查方法 Screen11 的心理测量特性和诊断有效性。在北欧国家,Screen11 中的项目已被用于确定嗓音疾病在普通人群和特定职业人群中的患病率。然而,该工具尚未经过验证:本研究的嗓音患者组(n = 54)由图尔库大学中心医院嗓音门诊寻求帮助的患者组成。对于这些嗓音患者,我们还招募了嗓音健康的对照组(n = 61),他们在性别、年龄和职业方面均符合要求。参与者在回答 Screen11 问卷的同时,还回答了 VHI 和 VAPP:初步探索性因子分析结果表明,Screen11 的所有项目都负载在一个共同的潜在因子上。此外,Screen11 具有较高的内部一致性(α = .93),并且与其他嗓音问卷有足够的相关性:结论:研究结果表明,Screen11 能在早期筛查出可能的嗓音疾病,并成功地进行了验证。就诊断有效性而言,Screen11 的总分更为可取。在区分可能患有嗓音疾病的患者和嗓音健康的患者时,阈值应≥15。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology
Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology is an amalgamation of the former journals Scandinavian Journal of Logopedics & Phoniatrics and VOICE. The intention is to cover topics related to speech, language and voice pathology as well as normal voice function in its different aspects. The Journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Phonation and laryngeal physiology Speech and language development Voice disorders Clinical measurements of speech, language and voice Professional voice including singing Bilingualism Cleft lip and palate Dyslexia Fluency disorders Neurolinguistics and psycholinguistics Aphasia Motor speech disorders Voice rehabilitation of laryngectomees Augmentative and alternative communication Acoustics Dysphagia Publications may have the form of original articles, i.e. theoretical or methodological studies or empirical reports, of reviews of books and dissertations, as well as of short reports, of minor or ongoing studies or short notes, commenting on earlier published material. Submitted papers will be evaluated by referees with relevant expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信