Investigation of the effects of different drugs on the prevention of intrapleural adhesion in a rat model.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Barış Sarıçoban, Murat Kuru, Sıddıka Fındık, İbrahim Kılınç, Tamer Altınok
{"title":"Investigation of the effects of different drugs on the prevention of intrapleural adhesion in a rat model.","authors":"Barış Sarıçoban, Murat Kuru, Sıddıka Fındık, İbrahim Kılınç, Tamer Altınok","doi":"10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.25516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the antifibrinolytic and anti-inflammatory effects of hesperidin, tenoxicam and enoxaparin on intrapleural adhesions in an experimental rat model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 52 healthy adult male Wistar Albino rats from the same colony were randomly divided into six groups as sham (Group 1), surgical control (Group 2), low-dose hesperidin (Group 3), high-dose hesperidin (Group 4), tenoxicam (Group 5), and enoxaparin (Group 6). All subjects underwent left thoracotomy and except for the sham group, an adhesion model was applied and, postoperatively, the drugs were administered intraperitoneally. On Day 11 postoperatively, the rats were sacrificed and their blood levels of interleukin-1β and interleukin-10 were examined and they were evaluated for pleural adhesion area, adhesion severity score, mesothelial cell proliferation score, mononuclear cell infiltration score, and macrophage infiltration score in the collagen layer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lowest adhesion area and adhesion severity score were found in Group 6. There was a statistically significant difference between Group 2 and Group 6 and between Group 3 and Group 6 in terms of both parameters (p=0.04 and p=0.02). As for adhesion area, a statistically significant difference was found between Group 5 and Group 6 (p=0.04). Statistically significant differences were also found between Group 2 and Group 5 in terms of mesothelial cell proliferation scores and between Group 1 and Group 4 in terms of mononuclear cell infiltration scores (p=0.03 and p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enoxaparin, tenoxicam, and high-dose hesperidin act at different points to prevent adhesion in rats.</p>","PeriodicalId":49413,"journal":{"name":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"32 1","pages":"62-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10964299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.25516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the antifibrinolytic and anti-inflammatory effects of hesperidin, tenoxicam and enoxaparin on intrapleural adhesions in an experimental rat model.

Methods: A total of 52 healthy adult male Wistar Albino rats from the same colony were randomly divided into six groups as sham (Group 1), surgical control (Group 2), low-dose hesperidin (Group 3), high-dose hesperidin (Group 4), tenoxicam (Group 5), and enoxaparin (Group 6). All subjects underwent left thoracotomy and except for the sham group, an adhesion model was applied and, postoperatively, the drugs were administered intraperitoneally. On Day 11 postoperatively, the rats were sacrificed and their blood levels of interleukin-1β and interleukin-10 were examined and they were evaluated for pleural adhesion area, adhesion severity score, mesothelial cell proliferation score, mononuclear cell infiltration score, and macrophage infiltration score in the collagen layer.

Results: The lowest adhesion area and adhesion severity score were found in Group 6. There was a statistically significant difference between Group 2 and Group 6 and between Group 3 and Group 6 in terms of both parameters (p=0.04 and p=0.02). As for adhesion area, a statistically significant difference was found between Group 5 and Group 6 (p=0.04). Statistically significant differences were also found between Group 2 and Group 5 in terms of mesothelial cell proliferation scores and between Group 1 and Group 4 in terms of mononuclear cell infiltration scores (p=0.03 and p=0.02).

Conclusion: Enoxaparin, tenoxicam, and high-dose hesperidin act at different points to prevent adhesion in rats.

在大鼠模型中研究不同药物对预防胸膜内粘连的影响。
背景:本研究旨在探讨七叶皂苷、替诺昔康和依诺肝素对实验大鼠胸膜内粘连的抗纤维蛋白溶解和抗炎作用:将来自同一鼠群的 52 只健康成年雄性 Wistar Albino 大鼠随机分为 6 组,即假组(第 1 组)、手术对照组(第 2 组)、低剂量橙皮素组(第 3 组)、高剂量橙皮素组(第 4 组)、替诺昔康组(第 5 组)和依诺肝素组(第 6 组)。除假组外,所有受试者均接受了左侧开胸手术,并应用粘连模型,术后腹腔注射药物。术后第 11 天,大鼠被处死,检测其血液中白细胞介素-1β 和白细胞介素-10 的水平,并评估胸膜粘连面积、粘连严重程度评分、间皮细胞增殖评分、单核细胞浸润评分和胶原层巨噬细胞浸润评分:第 6 组的粘连面积和粘连严重程度评分最低,第 2 组和第 6 组之间以及第 3 组和第 6 组之间在这两项参数上的差异均有统计学意义(P=0.04 和 P=0.02)。至于粘附面积,第 5 组和第 6 组之间的差异有统计学意义(P=0.04)。在间皮细胞增殖评分方面,第 2 组和第 5 组之间的差异也有统计学意义;在单核细胞浸润评分方面,第 1 组和第 4 组之间的差异也有统计学意义(P=0.03 和 P=0.02):结论:依诺肝素、替诺昔康和大剂量七叶皂苷能在不同点上防止大鼠粘连。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is an international open access journal which publishes original articles on topics in generality of Cardiac, Thoracic, Arterial, Venous, Lymphatic Disorders and their managements. These encompass all relevant clinical, surgical and experimental studies, editorials, current and collective reviews, technical know-how papers, case reports, interesting images, How to Do It papers, correspondences, and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信