Using Real-World Data to Externally Evaluate Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Dexmedetomidine in Children and Infants

Sean McCann BS, Victória E. Helfer PhD, Stephen J. Balevic MD, PhD, Chi D. Hornik PharmD, Stuart L. Goldstein MD, Julie Autmizguine MD, Marisa Meyer DO, Amira Al-Uzri MD, MCR, Sarah G. Anderson MS, Elizabeth H. Payne PhD, Sitora Turdalieva MS, Daniel Gonzalez PharmD, PhD, the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act – Pediatric Trials Network Steering Committee
{"title":"Using Real-World Data to Externally Evaluate Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Dexmedetomidine in Children and Infants","authors":"Sean McCann BS,&nbsp;Victória E. Helfer PhD,&nbsp;Stephen J. Balevic MD, PhD,&nbsp;Chi D. Hornik PharmD,&nbsp;Stuart L. Goldstein MD,&nbsp;Julie Autmizguine MD,&nbsp;Marisa Meyer DO,&nbsp;Amira Al-Uzri MD, MCR,&nbsp;Sarah G. Anderson MS,&nbsp;Elizabeth H. Payne PhD,&nbsp;Sitora Turdalieva MS,&nbsp;Daniel Gonzalez PharmD, PhD,&nbsp;the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act – Pediatric Trials Network Steering Committee","doi":"10.1002/jcph.2434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dexmedetomidine is a sedative used in both adults and off-label in children with considerable reported pharmacokinetic (PK) interindividual variability affecting drug exposure across populations. Several published models describe the population PKs of dexmedetomidine in neonates, infants, children, and adolescents, though very few have been externally evaluated. A prospective PK dataset of dexmedetomidine plasma concentrations in children and young adults aged 0.01-19.9 years was collected as part of a multicenter opportunistic PK study. A PubMed search of studies reporting dexmedetomidine PK identified five population PK models developed with data from demographically similar children that were selected for external validation. A total of 168 plasma concentrations from 102 children were compared with both population (PRED) and individualized (IPRED) predicted values from each of the five published models by quantitative and visual analyses using NONMEM (v7.3) and R (v4.1.3). Mean percent prediction errors from observed values ranged from −1% to 120% for PRED, and −24% to 60% for IPRED. The model by James et al, which was developed using similar “real-world” data, nearly met the generalizability criteria from IPRED predictions. Other models developed using clinical trial data may have been limited by inclusion/exclusion criteria and a less racially diverse population than this study's opportunistic dataset. The James model may represent a useful, but limited tool for model-informed dosing of hospitalized children.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"64 8","pages":"963-974"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcph.2434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dexmedetomidine is a sedative used in both adults and off-label in children with considerable reported pharmacokinetic (PK) interindividual variability affecting drug exposure across populations. Several published models describe the population PKs of dexmedetomidine in neonates, infants, children, and adolescents, though very few have been externally evaluated. A prospective PK dataset of dexmedetomidine plasma concentrations in children and young adults aged 0.01-19.9 years was collected as part of a multicenter opportunistic PK study. A PubMed search of studies reporting dexmedetomidine PK identified five population PK models developed with data from demographically similar children that were selected for external validation. A total of 168 plasma concentrations from 102 children were compared with both population (PRED) and individualized (IPRED) predicted values from each of the five published models by quantitative and visual analyses using NONMEM (v7.3) and R (v4.1.3). Mean percent prediction errors from observed values ranged from −1% to 120% for PRED, and −24% to 60% for IPRED. The model by James et al, which was developed using similar “real-world” data, nearly met the generalizability criteria from IPRED predictions. Other models developed using clinical trial data may have been limited by inclusion/exclusion criteria and a less racially diverse population than this study's opportunistic dataset. The James model may represent a useful, but limited tool for model-informed dosing of hospitalized children.

利用真实世界数据对儿童和婴儿右美托咪定的群体药代动力学模型进行外部评估。
右美托咪定是一种镇静剂,既可用于成人,也可在标签外用于儿童,据报道其药代动力学(PK)个体间差异很大,会影响不同人群的药物暴露量。一些已发表的模型描述了右美托咪定在新生儿、婴儿、儿童和青少年中的人群 PK,但很少有模型经过外部评估。一项多中心机会性 PK 研究收集了 0.01-19.9 岁儿童和青少年右美托咪定血浆浓度的前瞻性 PK 数据集。通过在PubMed上搜索报道右美托咪定PK的研究,发现了五个利用人口统计学上相似的儿童数据开发的人群PK模型,并选择这些模型进行外部验证。通过使用 NONMEM (v7.3) 和 R (v4.1.3) 进行定量和直观分析,将 102 名儿童的 168 个血浆浓度与五个已发表模型中每个模型的群体预测值(PRED)和个体化预测值(IPRED)进行了比较。PRED 预测值与观测值的平均百分比误差在-1%到 120%之间,IPRED 预测值与观测值的平均百分比误差在-24%到 60%之间。James 等人利用类似的 "真实世界 "数据开发的模型几乎达到了 IPRED 预测的通用性标准。与本研究的机会性数据集相比,其他利用临床试验数据开发的模型可能会受到纳入/排除标准和种族多样性人群的限制。詹姆斯模型可能是对住院儿童用药进行模型指导的有用但有限的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信