Home- vs gym-based exercise delivery modes of two multicomponent intensity training regimes on cardiorespiratory fitness and arterial stiffness in adults with intellectual and developmental disability during the COVID-19 pandemic - a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.5 4区医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1177/17446295241242507

Xavier Melo, Bruno Simão, Catarina Catela, Isabel Oliveira, Sara Planche, Ana Louseiro, João Luís Marôco, Guillermo R Oviedo, Bo Fernhall, Helena Santa-Clara

{"title":"Home- vs gym-based exercise delivery modes of two multicomponent intensity training regimes on cardiorespiratory fitness and arterial stiffness in adults with intellectual and developmental disability during the COVID-19 pandemic - a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Xavier Melo, Bruno Simão, Catarina Catela, Isabel Oliveira, Sara Planche, Ana Louseiro, João Luís Marôco, Guillermo R Oviedo, Bo Fernhall, Helena Santa-Clara","doi":"10.1177/17446295241242507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We compared the effects of home- vs gym-based delivery modes of two 8-week supervised multicomponent intensity training regimes on cardiorespiratory fitness and arterial stiffness in 17 adults with intellectual and developmental disability during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Participants were assigned to sprint interval training or continuous aerobic training, both incorporating resistance training. The intervention started with 8-weeks of online training (M1-M2), 1-month of detraining, plus 8-weeks of gym-based training (M3-M4). Results: Peak oxygen uptake decreased from M1-M2 and increased from M2-M4. Central arterial stiffness decreased between M1-M2, and M1-M4, along with peripheral arterial stiffness. Central systolic blood pressure decreased from M1-M2 only with sprint interval training. Conclusion: Home-based training minimized the negative impact of the lockdown on central arterial stiffness and central blood pressure, but it did not match the benefits on cardiorespiratory fitness and peripheral arterial stiffness of a gym-based intervention, irrespective of the multicomponent intensity training regime. Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05701943.","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295241242507"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295241242507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We compared the effects of home- vs gym-based delivery modes of two 8-week supervised multicomponent intensity training regimes on cardiorespiratory fitness and arterial stiffness in 17 adults with intellectual and developmental disability during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Participants were assigned to sprint interval training or continuous aerobic training, both incorporating resistance training. The intervention started with 8-weeks of online training (M1-M2), 1-month of detraining, plus 8-weeks of gym-based training (M3-M4). Results: Peak oxygen uptake decreased from M1-M2 and increased from M2-M4. Central arterial stiffness decreased between M1-M2, and M1-M4, along with peripheral arterial stiffness. Central systolic blood pressure decreased from M1-M2 only with sprint interval training. Conclusion: Home-based training minimized the negative impact of the lockdown on central arterial stiffness and central blood pressure, but it did not match the benefits on cardiorespiratory fitness and peripheral arterial stiffness of a gym-based intervention, irrespective of the multicomponent intensity training regime. Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05701943.

查看原文本刊更多论文

COVID-19大流行期间，两种多成分强度训练的家庭与健身房运动模式对智力和发育障碍成人心肺功能和动脉僵化的影响--随机对照试验。

背景：在 COVID-19 大流行期间，我们比较了家庭与健身房两种为期 8 周的监督多成分强度训练方法对 17 名智力和发育障碍成人的心肺功能和动脉僵化的影响。训练方法参与者被分配进行短跑间歇训练或持续有氧训练，两者都包含阻力训练。干预措施包括为期 8 周的在线训练（M1-M2）、1 个月的脱离训练以及为期 8 周的健身房训练（M3-M4）。结果显示峰值摄氧量从 M1 到 M2 有所下降，从 M2 到 M4 有所上升。中心动脉僵硬度在 M1-M2 和 M1-M4 之间有所下降，外周动脉僵硬度也有所下降。只有在短跑间歇训练时，中心收缩压才会在 M1-M2 期间下降。结论是家庭训练最大程度地减少了禁闭对中心动脉僵化和中心血压的负面影响，但无论采用哪种多成分强度训练方法，家庭训练都无法比拟健身房干预对心肺功能和外周动脉僵化的益处。已在 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05701943 登记。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Multiple-

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

13.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The principal aim of the journal is to provide a medium for the exchange of best practice, knowledge and research between academic and professional disciplines from education, social and health settings to bring about advancement of services for people with intellectual disabilities. The idea of a practice-led journal is both exciting and timely. This journal serves as a medium for all those involved with people with intellectual disabilities to submit and publish papers on issues relevant to promoting services for people with intellectual disabilities.