Trends in the use of neuromuscular blocking agents, reversal agents and neuromuscular transmission monitoring: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Piet Krijtenburg, Arjen de Boer, Lori D Bash, Gert Jan Scheffer, Christiaan Keijzer, Michiel C Warlé
{"title":"Trends in the use of neuromuscular blocking agents, reversal agents and neuromuscular transmission monitoring: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Piet Krijtenburg, Arjen de Boer, Lori D Bash, Gert Jan Scheffer, Christiaan Keijzer, Michiel C Warlé","doi":"10.1186/s13741-024-00382-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB) remains a persistent and preventable problem, with serious risks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our objective was to describe and assess patterns in the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), neuromuscular transmission (NMT) monitoring, and factors associated with the use of sugammadex. We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study based on electronic medical records in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands that introduced an integrated NMT monitoring module with automatic recording in 2017. A total of 22,000 cases were randomly selected from all surgeries between January 2015 and December 2019 that required endotracheal intubation with the use of an NMBA. A total of 14,592 cases fulfilled all the inclusion criteria for complete analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative NMBA usage remained the same over time. For rocuronium, spontaneous reversal decreased from 86 to 81%, sugammadex reversal increased from 12 to 18%. There was a decline in patients extubated in the operating room (OR) with neither documented NMT monitoring nor sugammadex-mediated reversal from 46 to 31%. The percentage of patients extubated in the OR without a documented train-of-four ratio ≥ 0.9, decreased from 77 to 56%. Several factors were independently associated with the use of sugammadex, including BMI > 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (odds ratio: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.24-1.60), ASA class 3 or 4 (1.20; 1.07-1.34), age > 60 years (1.37; 1.23-1.53), duration of surgery < 120 min (3.01; 2.68-3.38), emergency surgery (1.83; 1.60-2.09), laparoscopic surgery (2.01; 1.71-2.36), open abdominal/thoracic surgery (1.56; 1.38-1.78), NMT monitoring used (5.31; 4.63-6.08), total dose of rocuronium (1.99; 1.76-2.25), and (inversely) use of inhalational anaesthetics (0.88; 0.79-0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data demonstrate that the implementation of NMT monitoring with automatic recording coincides with a gradual increase in the (documented) use of NMT monitoring and an increased use of sugammadex with a more precise dose. Factors associated with sugammadex use include higher age, ASA score, BMI, abdominal and thoracic surgery, higher rocuronium doses, emergency surgery and the use of NMT monitoring. Trial registration N/A.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>• Introduction of NMT monitoring with automatic recording coincides with an increase in (documented) use of NMT monitoring. • Sugammadex is more frequently used in patients with a presumed higher a priori risk of pulmonary complications. • Despite increased NMT monitoring and use of sugammadex a significant percentage of patients remain at potential risk of rNMB.</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10967106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00382-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB) remains a persistent and preventable problem, with serious risks.

Methods: Our objective was to describe and assess patterns in the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), neuromuscular transmission (NMT) monitoring, and factors associated with the use of sugammadex. We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study based on electronic medical records in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands that introduced an integrated NMT monitoring module with automatic recording in 2017. A total of 22,000 cases were randomly selected from all surgeries between January 2015 and December 2019 that required endotracheal intubation with the use of an NMBA. A total of 14,592 cases fulfilled all the inclusion criteria for complete analyses.

Results: Relative NMBA usage remained the same over time. For rocuronium, spontaneous reversal decreased from 86 to 81%, sugammadex reversal increased from 12 to 18%. There was a decline in patients extubated in the operating room (OR) with neither documented NMT monitoring nor sugammadex-mediated reversal from 46 to 31%. The percentage of patients extubated in the OR without a documented train-of-four ratio ≥ 0.9, decreased from 77 to 56%. Several factors were independently associated with the use of sugammadex, including BMI > 30 kg/m2 (odds ratio: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.24-1.60), ASA class 3 or 4 (1.20; 1.07-1.34), age > 60 years (1.37; 1.23-1.53), duration of surgery < 120 min (3.01; 2.68-3.38), emergency surgery (1.83; 1.60-2.09), laparoscopic surgery (2.01; 1.71-2.36), open abdominal/thoracic surgery (1.56; 1.38-1.78), NMT monitoring used (5.31; 4.63-6.08), total dose of rocuronium (1.99; 1.76-2.25), and (inversely) use of inhalational anaesthetics (0.88; 0.79-0.99).

Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that the implementation of NMT monitoring with automatic recording coincides with a gradual increase in the (documented) use of NMT monitoring and an increased use of sugammadex with a more precise dose. Factors associated with sugammadex use include higher age, ASA score, BMI, abdominal and thoracic surgery, higher rocuronium doses, emergency surgery and the use of NMT monitoring. Trial registration N/A.

Key points: • Introduction of NMT monitoring with automatic recording coincides with an increase in (documented) use of NMT monitoring. • Sugammadex is more frequently used in patients with a presumed higher a priori risk of pulmonary complications. • Despite increased NMT monitoring and use of sugammadex a significant percentage of patients remain at potential risk of rNMB.

神经肌肉阻滞剂、逆转剂和神经肌肉传导监测的使用趋势:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
背景:残留神经肌肉阻滞(rNMB)仍然是一个长期存在且可预防的问题,具有严重的风险:我们的目的是描述和评估神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBA)的使用模式、神经肌肉传导(NMT)监测以及与使用苏甘麦相关的因素。我们基于荷兰一家大型教学医院的电子病历开展了一项回顾性观察队列研究,该医院于 2017 年引入了自动记录的集成 NMT 监测模块。我们从 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间所有需要使用 NMBA 进行气管插管的手术中随机抽取了 22000 个病例。共有14592个病例符合完整分析的所有纳入标准:随着时间的推移,NMBA 的相对使用率保持不变。罗库溴铵的自发逆转率从 86% 降至 81%,苏加麦克斯的逆转率从 12% 上升至 18%。在手术室(OR)中拔管的患者中,既无 NMT 监测记录也无舒格迈司介导逆转的患者比例从 46% 降至 31%。在手术室拔管的患者中,无记录的四人训练比≥ 0.9 的患者比例从 77% 降至 56%。有几个因素与舒格迈地的使用独立相关,包括 BMI > 30 kg/m2(几率比:1.41;95% CI:1.24-1.60)、ASA 3 级或 4 级(1.20;1.07-1.34)、年龄 > 60 岁(1.37;1.23-1.53)、手术时间 < 120 分钟(3.01;2.68-3.38)、急诊手术(1.83;1.60-2.09)、腹腔镜手术(2.01;1.71-2.36)、开腹/开胸手术(1.56;1.38-1.78)、使用的 NMT 监测(5.31;4.63-6.08)、罗库洛铵总剂量(1.99;1.76-2.25)和(相反)吸入麻醉剂的使用(0.88;0.79-0.99):我们的数据表明,在实施带有自动记录功能的 NMT 监测的同时,NMT 监测的(有记录的)使用率也在逐步提高,而且使用剂量更精确的舒格迈司的情况也在增加。与使用苏甘麦克斯相关的因素包括:较高的年龄、ASA评分、体重指数、腹部和胸部手术、较高的罗库洛铵剂量、急诊手术和使用NMT监测。试验登记不详:- 带自动记录功能的 NMT 监测的引入与 NMT 监测(有记录的)使用的增加相吻合。- 舒格迈司更常用于肺部并发症先验风险较高的患者。- 尽管增加了 NMT 监测和舒格迈司的使用,但仍有相当比例的患者面临 rNMB 的潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信