No difference in fat oxidation, postexercise energy expenditure or energy intake following ingestion of a protein-based breakfast compared to carbohydrate breakfast.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Angela R Hillman, Lane Cullums, Abigail Peairs, Sophie A Miller
{"title":"No difference in fat oxidation, postexercise energy expenditure or energy intake following ingestion of a protein-based breakfast compared to carbohydrate breakfast.","authors":"Angela R Hillman, Lane Cullums, Abigail Peairs, Sophie A Miller","doi":"10.1177/02601060241241359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Manipulation of macronutrient intake and exercise can alter overall energy consumption and potentially body composition. <b>Aim</b>: The purpose of this study was to manipulate the macronutrient content of breakfast before exercise to investigate the impact on exercise energy expenditure and postexercise energy intake (EI). <b>Methods:</b> Twelve active men were recruited, 11 finished the study protocol (age: 28 ± 9 years; VO<sub>2</sub>max: 56 ± 5 ml·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>). In a randomized crossover design, each participant completed 4 trials, 3 consisting of a specific breakfast (protein, PRO; carbohydrate, CHO; noncaloric; NON-CAL) followed in 1 h by a 45 minutes moderate intensity treadmill exercise protocol. The fourth trial consisted of breakfast and no exercise (CON). An ad-libitum lunch and food for the rest of the day were provided and assessed for EI. Measures included resting metabolic rate pre- and postbreakfast along with oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>) during and after exercise, along with hunger scales, and blood measures of glucose, insulin and plasma-PYY prebreakfast, pre-exercise, postexercise, and 60 minutes postexercise. <b>Results:</b> Fat oxidation was highest during exercise in the NON-CAL (0.57 g·min<sup>-1</sup>) trial with similar levels of fat oxidation between PRO (0.50 g·min<sup>-1</sup>) and CHO trials (0.48 g·min<sup>-1</sup>). Hunger was not affected by PRO intake or exercise, nor was appetite hormones and glucose. EI at lunch and dinner was not significantly different between trials. <b>Conclusion:</b> Pre-exercise PRO intake did not modify fat oxidation during exercise, did not lead to a larger VO<sub>2</sub> versus CHO, nor did it attenuate EI postexercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060241241359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Manipulation of macronutrient intake and exercise can alter overall energy consumption and potentially body composition. Aim: The purpose of this study was to manipulate the macronutrient content of breakfast before exercise to investigate the impact on exercise energy expenditure and postexercise energy intake (EI). Methods: Twelve active men were recruited, 11 finished the study protocol (age: 28 ± 9 years; VO2max: 56 ± 5 ml·kg-1·min-1). In a randomized crossover design, each participant completed 4 trials, 3 consisting of a specific breakfast (protein, PRO; carbohydrate, CHO; noncaloric; NON-CAL) followed in 1 h by a 45 minutes moderate intensity treadmill exercise protocol. The fourth trial consisted of breakfast and no exercise (CON). An ad-libitum lunch and food for the rest of the day were provided and assessed for EI. Measures included resting metabolic rate pre- and postbreakfast along with oxygen uptake (VO2) during and after exercise, along with hunger scales, and blood measures of glucose, insulin and plasma-PYY prebreakfast, pre-exercise, postexercise, and 60 minutes postexercise. Results: Fat oxidation was highest during exercise in the NON-CAL (0.57 g·min-1) trial with similar levels of fat oxidation between PRO (0.50 g·min-1) and CHO trials (0.48 g·min-1). Hunger was not affected by PRO intake or exercise, nor was appetite hormones and glucose. EI at lunch and dinner was not significantly different between trials. Conclusion: Pre-exercise PRO intake did not modify fat oxidation during exercise, did not lead to a larger VO2 versus CHO, nor did it attenuate EI postexercise.

与碳水化合物早餐相比,摄入蛋白质早餐后,脂肪氧化、运动后能量消耗或能量摄入均无差异。
背景:控制宏量营养素摄入和运动可改变总体能量消耗,并可能改变身体组成。目的:本研究旨在操纵运动前早餐中的宏量营养素含量,以调查其对运动能量消耗和运动后能量摄入(EI)的影响。研究方法招募了 12 名活跃的男性,其中 11 人完成了研究方案(年龄:28 ± 9 岁;最大氧饱和度:56 ± 5 ml-kg-1-min-1)。在随机交叉设计中,每位参与者完成了 4 项试验,其中 3 项包括特定早餐(蛋白质,PRO;碳水化合物,CHO;非热量,NON-CAL),然后在 1 小时内进行 45 分钟中等强度的跑步机运动。第四项试验包括早餐和不运动(CON)。午餐为零食,其余时间为食物,并对 EI 进行评估。测量指标包括早餐前和早餐后的静息代谢率、运动中和运动后的摄氧量(VO2)、饥饿量表以及早餐前、运动前、运动后和运动后 60 分钟的血糖、胰岛素和血浆PYY 测量值。结果显示在非碳酸试验(0.57 克/分钟-1)中,运动期间的脂肪氧化率最高,而在PRO 试验(0.50 克/分钟-1)和CHO 试验(0.48 克/分钟-1)中,脂肪氧化率水平相似。饥饿感不受 PRO 摄入量或运动的影响,食欲激素和葡萄糖也不受影响。午餐和晚餐的食欲指数在不同试验之间没有明显差异。结论运动前摄入PRO不会改变运动中的脂肪氧化,不会导致相对于CHO的更大的VO2,也不会降低运动后的EI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition and health
Nutrition and health Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信