[Association between abnormal oral glucose tolerance test patterns in the second trimester and large for gestational age newborns].

A Zhang, M Y Su, L J Zheng, L Chen, G C Liu, L L Song, Y J Wang
{"title":"[Association between abnormal oral glucose tolerance test patterns in the second trimester and large for gestational age newborns].","authors":"A Zhang, M Y Su, L J Zheng, L Chen, G C Liu, L L Song, Y J Wang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20231107-00178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the impact of abnormal patterns of 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in the second trimester on the risk of large for gestational age (LGA) newborn deliveries. <b>Methods:</b> General clinical data and OGTT results of 66 290 pregnant women who received regular prenatal care and delivered in Guangdong Maternal and Child Health Hospital from December 24, 2016 to July 26, 2022 were collected. According to the results of OGTT, the pregnant women were divided into 8 groups: normal blood glucose group (normal fasting blood glucose, 1-hour and 2-hour after oral glucose, 54 518 cases), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) 0 group (only abnormal fasting blood glucose, 1 430 cases), GDM 1 group (only abnormal blood glucose at 1-hour after oral glucose, 2 150 cases), GDM 2 group (only abnormal blood glucose at 2-hour after oral glucose, 3 736 cases), GDM 0+1 group (both fasting blood glucose and 1-hour after oral glucose were abnormal, 371 cases), GDM 0+2 group (both fasting blood glucose and 2-hour after oral glucose were abnormal, 280 cases), GDM 1+2 group (abnormal blood glucose at 1-hour and 2-hour after oral glucose, 2 981 cases) and GDM 0+1+2 group (abnormal fasting blood glucose, 1-hour and 2-hour after oral glucose, 824 cases). Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the effects of different abnormal OGTT patterns on LGA. In addition, the blood glucose measurements at the three time points of OGTT were combined and used as continuous variables in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to evaluate the predictive value of each blood glucose measurement mode for LGA and the area under the curve (AUC) was compared. <b>Results:</b> (1) Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the risks of LGA were significantly increased in GDM 0 group (<i>OR</i>=1.76, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.50-2.08; <i>P</i><0.001), GDM 0+1 group (<i>OR</i>=2.29, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.72-3.04; <i>P</i><0.001), and GDM 0+1+2 group (<i>OR</i>=1.98, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.61-2.43; <i>P</i><0.001). (2) ROC curve analysis showed that fasting blood glucose, 1-hour after oral glucose, 2-hour after oral glucose, fasting+1-hour after oral glucose, fasting+2-hour after oral glucose, 1-hour+2-hour after oral glucose, and fasting+1-hour+2-hour after oral glucose had certain predictive value for LGA (all <i>P</i><0.001). The AUC of fasting blood glucose measurement was higher than that of 2-hour blood glucose measurement in predicting LGA, and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05). There was no significant difference in the AUC between fasting blood glucose and other blood glucose measurement modes for predicting LGA (all <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> In the abnormal OGTT patterns, pregnant women with abnormal fasting blood glucose, abnormal fasting+1-hour after oral glucose, and abnormal fasting+1-hour+2-hour after oral glucose have an increased risk of LGA. Fasting blood glucose measurement is of great significance for the prediction of LGA, and could be used as an optimal indicator to evaluate the risk of LGA in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10050,"journal":{"name":"中华妇产科杂志","volume":"59 3","pages":"184-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华妇产科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20231107-00178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the impact of abnormal patterns of 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in the second trimester on the risk of large for gestational age (LGA) newborn deliveries. Methods: General clinical data and OGTT results of 66 290 pregnant women who received regular prenatal care and delivered in Guangdong Maternal and Child Health Hospital from December 24, 2016 to July 26, 2022 were collected. According to the results of OGTT, the pregnant women were divided into 8 groups: normal blood glucose group (normal fasting blood glucose, 1-hour and 2-hour after oral glucose, 54 518 cases), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) 0 group (only abnormal fasting blood glucose, 1 430 cases), GDM 1 group (only abnormal blood glucose at 1-hour after oral glucose, 2 150 cases), GDM 2 group (only abnormal blood glucose at 2-hour after oral glucose, 3 736 cases), GDM 0+1 group (both fasting blood glucose and 1-hour after oral glucose were abnormal, 371 cases), GDM 0+2 group (both fasting blood glucose and 2-hour after oral glucose were abnormal, 280 cases), GDM 1+2 group (abnormal blood glucose at 1-hour and 2-hour after oral glucose, 2 981 cases) and GDM 0+1+2 group (abnormal fasting blood glucose, 1-hour and 2-hour after oral glucose, 824 cases). Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the effects of different abnormal OGTT patterns on LGA. In addition, the blood glucose measurements at the three time points of OGTT were combined and used as continuous variables in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to evaluate the predictive value of each blood glucose measurement mode for LGA and the area under the curve (AUC) was compared. Results: (1) Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the risks of LGA were significantly increased in GDM 0 group (OR=1.76, 95%CI: 1.50-2.08; P<0.001), GDM 0+1 group (OR=2.29, 95%CI: 1.72-3.04; P<0.001), and GDM 0+1+2 group (OR=1.98, 95%CI: 1.61-2.43; P<0.001). (2) ROC curve analysis showed that fasting blood glucose, 1-hour after oral glucose, 2-hour after oral glucose, fasting+1-hour after oral glucose, fasting+2-hour after oral glucose, 1-hour+2-hour after oral glucose, and fasting+1-hour+2-hour after oral glucose had certain predictive value for LGA (all P<0.001). The AUC of fasting blood glucose measurement was higher than that of 2-hour blood glucose measurement in predicting LGA, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the AUC between fasting blood glucose and other blood glucose measurement modes for predicting LGA (all P>0.05). Conclusions: In the abnormal OGTT patterns, pregnant women with abnormal fasting blood glucose, abnormal fasting+1-hour after oral glucose, and abnormal fasting+1-hour+2-hour after oral glucose have an increased risk of LGA. Fasting blood glucose measurement is of great significance for the prediction of LGA, and could be used as an optimal indicator to evaluate the risk of LGA in clinical practice.

[怀孕后三个月口服葡萄糖耐量试验模式异常与胎龄偏大新生儿之间的关系]。
目的研究怀孕后三个月 75 克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)的异常模式对胎龄过大(LGA)新生儿分娩风险的影响。研究方法收集2016年12月24日至2022年7月26日在广东省妇幼保健院接受常规产前检查并分娩的66 290名孕妇的一般临床资料和OGTT结果。根据 OGTT 结果,孕妇被分为 8 组:血糖正常组(空腹血糖、口服葡萄糖后1小时和2小时血糖均正常,54 518例)、妊娠糖尿病(GDM)0组(仅空腹血糖异常,1 430例)、GDM 1组(仅口服葡萄糖后1小时血糖异常,2 150例)、GDM 2组(仅口服葡萄糖后2小时血糖异常,3 736例)、GDM 0+1 组(空腹血糖和口服葡萄糖后 1 小时血糖均异常,371 例)、GDM 0+2 组(空腹血糖和口服葡萄糖后 2 小时血糖均异常,280 例)、GDM 1+2 组(口服葡萄糖后 1 小时和 2 小时血糖均异常,2981 例)和 GDM 0+1+2 组(空腹血糖、口服葡萄糖后 1 小时和 2 小时血糖均异常,824 例)。多变量逻辑回归用于分析不同的 OGTT 异常模式对 LGA 的影响。此外,将 OGTT 三个时间点的血糖测量值合并,作为连续变量用于接收者操作特征曲线(ROC),以评估每种血糖测量模式对 LGA 的预测价值,并比较曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:(1)多变量逻辑回归分析显示,GDM 0 组发生 LGA 的风险显著增加(OR=1.76,95%CI:1.50-2.08;POR=2.29,95%CI:1.72-3.04;POR=1.98,95%CI:1.61-2.43;PPPP>0.05)。结论在异常 OGTT 模式中,空腹血糖异常、空腹+口服葡萄糖后 1 小时血糖异常、空腹+口服葡萄糖后 1 小时+2 小时血糖异常的孕妇发生 LGA 的风险增加。空腹血糖测量对预测LGA具有重要意义,在临床实践中可作为评估LGA风险的最佳指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12682
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信