Juan P. González-Varo, Beatriz Rumeu, Claudio A. Bracho-Estévanez, Lucía Acevedo-Limón, Christophe Baltzinger, Ádám Lovas-Kiss, Andy J. Green
{"title":"Overlooked seed-dispersal modes and underestimated distances","authors":"Juan P. González-Varo, Beatriz Rumeu, Claudio A. Bracho-Estévanez, Lucía Acevedo-Limón, Christophe Baltzinger, Ádám Lovas-Kiss, Andy J. Green","doi":"10.1111/geb.13835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Long-distance seed dispersal is a crucial process determining the distribution of plant biodiversity and, therefore, of major interest in biogeography and macroecology. A recent data article on <i>Global Ecology and Biogeography</i> presented a database of estimated seed-dispersal distance classes for the European flora, where the classes are defined by the morphological dispersal syndrome of species associated with a single dispersal mode. We explain how this article overlooks literature on the unreliable capacity of dispersal syndromes for predicting key dispersal modes involved in long-distance seed dispersal. Consequently, the published database does not consider the possibility that individual species can naturally be dispersed through multiple modes (polychory). Most importantly, the database consistently omits seed-dispersal modes that can mediate dispersal distances several orders of magnitude longer than the mode predicted by the syndromes. This is the case of many terrestrial and aquatic plants dispersed by animals, notably ungulates and waterbirds, and that of coastal plants dispersed by the sea. We thus urge caution when using this database to model potential plant dispersal because long-distance seed dispersal is underestimated in many species.</p>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"33 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13835","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Long-distance seed dispersal is a crucial process determining the distribution of plant biodiversity and, therefore, of major interest in biogeography and macroecology. A recent data article on Global Ecology and Biogeography presented a database of estimated seed-dispersal distance classes for the European flora, where the classes are defined by the morphological dispersal syndrome of species associated with a single dispersal mode. We explain how this article overlooks literature on the unreliable capacity of dispersal syndromes for predicting key dispersal modes involved in long-distance seed dispersal. Consequently, the published database does not consider the possibility that individual species can naturally be dispersed through multiple modes (polychory). Most importantly, the database consistently omits seed-dispersal modes that can mediate dispersal distances several orders of magnitude longer than the mode predicted by the syndromes. This is the case of many terrestrial and aquatic plants dispersed by animals, notably ungulates and waterbirds, and that of coastal plants dispersed by the sea. We thus urge caution when using this database to model potential plant dispersal because long-distance seed dispersal is underestimated in many species.
种子的远距离传播是决定植物生物多样性分布的关键过程,因此在生物地理学和宏观生态学中具有重要意义。最近,《全球生态学与生物地理学》(Global Ecology and Biogeography)上的一篇数据文章介绍了一个估算欧洲植物区系种子扩散距离等级的数据库,其中的等级是根据与单一扩散模式相关的物种的形态扩散综合征来定义的。我们解释了这篇文章是如何忽略了关于扩散综合征在预测种子远距离扩散的关键扩散模式方面能力不可靠的文献。因此,已发布的数据库没有考虑到单个物种可以通过多种模式(多模式)自然扩散的可能性。最重要的是,该数据库始终遗漏了一些种子传播模式,而这些模式的传播距离比综合模式预测的传播距离要长几个数量级。许多由动物(尤其是有蹄类动物和水鸟)散播的陆生和水生植物以及由海洋散播的沿海植物就属于这种情况。因此,我们建议在使用该数据库建立潜在的植物扩散模型时要谨慎,因为许多物种的远距离种子扩散都被低估了。
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.