{"title":"The \n \n \n ℓ\n p\n \n $\\ell ^p$\n norm of the Riesz–Titchmarsh transform for even integer \n \n p\n $p$","authors":"Rodrigo Bañuelos, Mateusz Kwaśnicki","doi":"10.1112/jlms.12888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The long-standing conjecture that for <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mo>∈</mo>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>∞</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$p \\in (1, \\infty)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>ℓ</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </msup>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>Z</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\ell ^p(\\mathbb {Z})$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> norm of the Riesz–Titchmarsh discrete Hilbert transform is the same as the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </msup>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$L^p(\\mathbb {R})$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> norm of the classical Hilbert transform, is verified when <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>2</mn>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$p = 2 n$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> or <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mfrac>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </mfrac>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>2</mn>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\frac{p}{p - 1} = 2 n$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, for <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n <mo>∈</mo>\n <mi>N</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$n \\in \\mathbb {N}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. The proof, which is algebraic in nature, depends in a crucial way on the sharp estimate for the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>ℓ</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </msup>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>Z</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\ell ^p(\\mathbb {Z})$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> norm of a different variant of this operator for the full range of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <annotation>$p$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. The latter result was recently proved by the authors (<i>Duke Math. J</i>. <b>168</b> (2019), no. 3, 471–504).</p>","PeriodicalId":49989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the London Mathematical Society-Second Series","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the London Mathematical Society-Second Series","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1112/jlms.12888","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The long-standing conjecture that for the norm of the Riesz–Titchmarsh discrete Hilbert transform is the same as the norm of the classical Hilbert transform, is verified when or , for . The proof, which is algebraic in nature, depends in a crucial way on the sharp estimate for the norm of a different variant of this operator for the full range of . The latter result was recently proved by the authors (Duke Math. J. 168 (2019), no. 3, 471–504).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the London Mathematical Society has been publishing leading research in a broad range of mathematical subject areas since 1926. The Journal welcomes papers on subjects of general interest that represent a significant advance in mathematical knowledge, as well as submissions that are deemed to stimulate new interest and research activity.