The ℓ p $\ell ^p$ norm of the Riesz–Titchmarsh transform for even integer p $p$

IF 1 2区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS
Rodrigo Bañuelos, Mateusz Kwaśnicki
{"title":"The \n \n \n ℓ\n p\n \n $\\ell ^p$\n norm of the Riesz–Titchmarsh transform for even integer \n \n p\n $p$","authors":"Rodrigo Bañuelos,&nbsp;Mateusz Kwaśnicki","doi":"10.1112/jlms.12888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The long-standing conjecture that for <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mo>∈</mo>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>∞</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$p \\in (1, \\infty)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>ℓ</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </msup>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>Z</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\ell ^p(\\mathbb {Z})$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> norm of the Riesz–Titchmarsh discrete Hilbert transform is the same as the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </msup>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$L^p(\\mathbb {R})$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> norm of the classical Hilbert transform, is verified when <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>2</mn>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$p = 2 n$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> or <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mfrac>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </mfrac>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>2</mn>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\frac{p}{p - 1} = 2 n$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, for <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n <mo>∈</mo>\n <mi>N</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$n \\in \\mathbb {N}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. The proof, which is algebraic in nature, depends in a crucial way on the sharp estimate for the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>ℓ</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </msup>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>Z</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\ell ^p(\\mathbb {Z})$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> norm of a different variant of this operator for the full range of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <annotation>$p$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. The latter result was recently proved by the authors (<i>Duke Math. J</i>. <b>168</b> (2019), no. 3, 471–504).</p>","PeriodicalId":49989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the London Mathematical Society-Second Series","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the London Mathematical Society-Second Series","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1112/jlms.12888","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The long-standing conjecture that for p ( 1 , ) $p \in (1, \infty)$ the p ( Z ) $\ell ^p(\mathbb {Z})$ norm of the Riesz–Titchmarsh discrete Hilbert transform is the same as the L p ( R ) $L^p(\mathbb {R})$ norm of the classical Hilbert transform, is verified when p = 2 n $p = 2 n$ or p p 1 = 2 n $\frac{p}{p - 1} = 2 n$ , for n N $n \in \mathbb {N}$ . The proof, which is algebraic in nature, depends in a crucial way on the sharp estimate for the p ( Z ) $\ell ^p(\mathbb {Z})$ norm of a different variant of this operator for the full range of p $p$ . The latter result was recently proved by the authors (Duke Math. J. 168 (2019), no. 3, 471–504).

偶整数 p $p$ 的里兹-蒂奇马什变换的 ℓ p $\ell ^p$ 准则
长期以来的猜想是,对于 p∈ ( 1 , ∞ ) $p \in (1, \infty)$ Riesz-Titchmarsh 离散希尔伯特变换的 ℓ p ( Z ) $ell ^p(\mathbb{Z})$规范与经典希尔伯特变换的 L p ( R ) $L^p(\mathbb {R})$ 规范相同,当 p = 2 n $p = 2 n$ 或 p p - 1 = 2 n $frac{p}{p - 1} = 2 n$ 时,对于 n∈ N $n \in \mathbb {N}$,这一猜想得到了验证。这个证明在本质上是代数的,它在一个关键的方面依赖于这个算子的一个不同变体对于整个 p $p$ 范围的 ℓ p ( Z ) $\ell ^p(\mathbb{Z})$规范的尖锐估计。作者最近证明了后一个结果(Duke Math.J. 168 (2019), no.3, 471-504).
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the London Mathematical Society has been publishing leading research in a broad range of mathematical subject areas since 1926. The Journal welcomes papers on subjects of general interest that represent a significant advance in mathematical knowledge, as well as submissions that are deemed to stimulate new interest and research activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信