Evaluating supplementation programs for growing calves grazing bermudagrass pastures

IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
A.M. Womack , PAS, E.B. Kegley , PAS, Shane Gadberry , PAS, T. Hess , D. Hubbell , P.A. Beck , PAS
{"title":"Evaluating supplementation programs for growing calves grazing bermudagrass pastures","authors":"A.M. Womack ,&nbsp;PAS,&nbsp;E.B. Kegley ,&nbsp;PAS,&nbsp;Shane Gadberry ,&nbsp;PAS,&nbsp;T. Hess ,&nbsp;D. Hubbell ,&nbsp;P.A. Beck ,&nbsp;PAS","doi":"10.15232/aas.2023-02494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Our objective was to determine gain in response to hand-fed (HF) or self-fed (SF) summer supplementation programs at the University of Arkansas Livestock and Forestry Research Station, on twenty 0.81-ha common bermudagrass (<em>Cynodon dactylon</em> [L.] Pers.) pastures at a stocking rate of 6.17 calves/ha (BW ± SD = 247 ± 24.6) over 3 yr.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>This experiment was designed in a 2 × 2 + 1 factorial arrangement of treatments including control (CON), with only free-choice mineral; HF, 1.13 kg/d byproduct-based supplement offered only late summer (LS) or all summer (AS); or SF tub supplement (PVM Cattle Tub, Positive Feed Ltd., Sealy, TX) either LS or AS. The HF supplement in yr 1 was a 50:50 blend of soybean hulls and corn gluten feed, in yr 2 an extruded dried distillers grains cube (MasterHand Milling, Lexington, NE) was used, and in yr 3 corn gluten feed was the HF supplement. Data were analyzed as a generalized randomized complete block design using the mixed procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Fixed effects in the model included supplementation treatment, year, and year × treatment interaction.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>Even though different HF supplements were used each year, there were no year × treatment interactions. Early summer ADG was greater for HFAS than CON and SFAS, whereas supplemental efficiency (kg added gain/kg supplement) in early summer was less for SFAS than HFAS. Late summer ADG was greater for HF treatments than SF treatments and CON, whereas SF did not differ among supplement treatments. Cost of added gain was $28.33 and $16.14/kg for SFAS and SFLS, respectively, compared with $3.32 and $1.68/ kg for HFAS and HFLS, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>Calves on this experiment did not respond as expected to the SF supplement, likely because the bermudagrass pastures in this experiment averaged over 13% CP and were in excess of 10% even in the LS sampling periods. Depending on supplement delivery costs, the most cost-effective way to add gain with supplement to growing calves grazing bermudagrass pasture is by HF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259028652400017X/pdf?md5=e7001816153191a8ae626b8ebab6eca2&pid=1-s2.0-S259028652400017X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259028652400017X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Our objective was to determine gain in response to hand-fed (HF) or self-fed (SF) summer supplementation programs at the University of Arkansas Livestock and Forestry Research Station, on twenty 0.81-ha common bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon [L.] Pers.) pastures at a stocking rate of 6.17 calves/ha (BW ± SD = 247 ± 24.6) over 3 yr.

Materials and Methods

This experiment was designed in a 2 × 2 + 1 factorial arrangement of treatments including control (CON), with only free-choice mineral; HF, 1.13 kg/d byproduct-based supplement offered only late summer (LS) or all summer (AS); or SF tub supplement (PVM Cattle Tub, Positive Feed Ltd., Sealy, TX) either LS or AS. The HF supplement in yr 1 was a 50:50 blend of soybean hulls and corn gluten feed, in yr 2 an extruded dried distillers grains cube (MasterHand Milling, Lexington, NE) was used, and in yr 3 corn gluten feed was the HF supplement. Data were analyzed as a generalized randomized complete block design using the mixed procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Fixed effects in the model included supplementation treatment, year, and year × treatment interaction.

Results and Discussion

Even though different HF supplements were used each year, there were no year × treatment interactions. Early summer ADG was greater for HFAS than CON and SFAS, whereas supplemental efficiency (kg added gain/kg supplement) in early summer was less for SFAS than HFAS. Late summer ADG was greater for HF treatments than SF treatments and CON, whereas SF did not differ among supplement treatments. Cost of added gain was $28.33 and $16.14/kg for SFAS and SFLS, respectively, compared with $3.32 and $1.68/ kg for HFAS and HFLS, respectively.

Implications and Applications

Calves on this experiment did not respond as expected to the SF supplement, likely because the bermudagrass pastures in this experiment averaged over 13% CP and were in excess of 10% even in the LS sampling periods. Depending on supplement delivery costs, the most cost-effective way to add gain with supplement to growing calves grazing bermudagrass pasture is by HF.

评估生长中的犊牛放牧百慕大草牧场的补充方案
目标我们的目标是确定阿肯色大学畜牧和林业研究站在 20 个 0.81 公顷的普通百慕大草(Cynodon dactylon [L.] Pers.)牧场上,在 6.17 头小牛/公顷的放养率下(体重 ± SD = 247 ± 24.材料与方法本实验采用 2 × 2 + 1 因式排列,处理包括:对照组(CON),仅提供自由选择的矿物质;HF,仅在夏末(LS)或整个夏季(AS)提供 1.13 千克/天的副产品补充剂;或 SF 浴盆补充剂(PVM 牛浴盆,Positive Feed Ltd., Sealy, TX、SF浴盆补充剂(PVM牛浴盆,Positive Feed Ltd,德克萨斯州西利市)。第 1 年的高频补充剂是大豆壳和玉米麸质饲料按 50:50 的比例混合而成,第 2 年使用的是挤压干燥的蒸馏谷物立方体(MasterHand Milling,莱克星顿,东北部),第 3 年的高频补充剂是玉米麸质饲料。数据采用 SAS(SAS Institute Inc.)模型中的固定效应包括添加处理、年份和年份 × 处理交互作用。结果与讨论尽管每年使用不同的高频添加剂,但并不存在年份 × 处理交互作用。夏初高频补饲的ADG高于CON和SFAS,而夏初SFAS的补饲效率(千克添加增重/千克补饲物)低于高频补饲。高频处理的夏末平均日增重高于低频处理和中频处理,而低频处理与中频处理之间没有差异。SFAS和SFLS的增重成本分别为28.33美元/公斤和16.14美元/公斤,而HFAS和HFLS的增重成本分别为3.32美元/公斤和1.68美元/公斤。根据补饲成本的不同,对放牧百慕大草牧草的生长犊牛进行补饲以提高增重的最经济有效的方法是高频补饲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Animal Science
Applied Animal Science AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信