Perspective and Commentary: Effects of conversion of farmland to an integrated beef cattle grazing operation and water use in the Southern Plains and Ogallala Aquifer of the USA

IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Miles E. Theurer , Jonathan Aguilar , Rachael Clews , J. Trent Fox , Gina Gigot , Marc Gigot , Tom M. Jones , Darrin McGraw , Justin W. Waggoner
{"title":"Perspective and Commentary: Effects of conversion of farmland to an integrated beef cattle grazing operation and water use in the Southern Plains and Ogallala Aquifer of the USA","authors":"Miles E. Theurer ,&nbsp;Jonathan Aguilar ,&nbsp;Rachael Clews ,&nbsp;J. Trent Fox ,&nbsp;Gina Gigot ,&nbsp;Marc Gigot ,&nbsp;Tom M. Jones ,&nbsp;Darrin McGraw ,&nbsp;Justin W. Waggoner","doi":"10.15232/aas.2023-02506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The objectives were to quantify the amount of water savings by converting farmland to an integrated cattle grazing operation through farming practices and cattle requirements, quantify estimated water savings from Thunderstruck Farms over a 20-yr period in relationship to a nearby municipality, and evaluate cattle water intake in backgrounding and feedlot phases.</p></div><div><h3>Sources</h3><p>Thunderstruck Farms is located near Garden City, Kansas, which has 3,035 irrigated hectares with the primary water source coming from the Ogallala Aquifer. In 2018 Thunderstruck Farms entered all its irrigated land into a water conservation area (WCA) to conserve water resources, and all crops grown are used for silage, hay, or pasture to support the dairy and feedyard enterprises in the region. Historical water and nitrogen use from Thunderstruck Farms was evaluated from 2013 through 2022. Light-weight beef cattle (181–272 kg) graze these irrigated pastures (approximately 120 d). Following the grazing season, the cattle are finished at Hy-Plains Feedyard (Montezuma, KS).</p></div><div><h3>Synthesis</h3><p>Thunderstruck Farms is allocated 22.9 billion liters of water annually for stock water and irrigation purposes. Thunderstruck Farms used 50.8 billion liters less water than allocated, with 57.8% of the conservation occurring during the 5-yr period of the WCA. Average nitrogen administration has decreased 39% per year since entering into the WCA. During the same period, Thunderstruck Farms has produced 2.8 million kilograms of total weight gain of beef; beef cattle were then transferred to Hy-Plains Feedyard to finish. Based on the calculations from this research, the average amount of water saved over a 4-yr period by decreasing commodity resource use by grazing cattle would average 1.1 billion liters of water each year per 4,047 ha. On average, cattle consumed 17.94 L/ head per day while grazing. Peak monthly water use corresponded with average ambient temperature peak during the summer months.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Applications</h3><p>Integrated grazing systems reduce the inputs required for cattle to reach a slaughter endpoint. They also may improve soil health. All of these practices result in more water availability for surrounding municipalities and allow for a thriving local economy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000272/pdf?md5=e2b9dc99bcab33977a97e1532ee87608&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286524000272-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The objectives were to quantify the amount of water savings by converting farmland to an integrated cattle grazing operation through farming practices and cattle requirements, quantify estimated water savings from Thunderstruck Farms over a 20-yr period in relationship to a nearby municipality, and evaluate cattle water intake in backgrounding and feedlot phases.

Sources

Thunderstruck Farms is located near Garden City, Kansas, which has 3,035 irrigated hectares with the primary water source coming from the Ogallala Aquifer. In 2018 Thunderstruck Farms entered all its irrigated land into a water conservation area (WCA) to conserve water resources, and all crops grown are used for silage, hay, or pasture to support the dairy and feedyard enterprises in the region. Historical water and nitrogen use from Thunderstruck Farms was evaluated from 2013 through 2022. Light-weight beef cattle (181–272 kg) graze these irrigated pastures (approximately 120 d). Following the grazing season, the cattle are finished at Hy-Plains Feedyard (Montezuma, KS).

Synthesis

Thunderstruck Farms is allocated 22.9 billion liters of water annually for stock water and irrigation purposes. Thunderstruck Farms used 50.8 billion liters less water than allocated, with 57.8% of the conservation occurring during the 5-yr period of the WCA. Average nitrogen administration has decreased 39% per year since entering into the WCA. During the same period, Thunderstruck Farms has produced 2.8 million kilograms of total weight gain of beef; beef cattle were then transferred to Hy-Plains Feedyard to finish. Based on the calculations from this research, the average amount of water saved over a 4-yr period by decreasing commodity resource use by grazing cattle would average 1.1 billion liters of water each year per 4,047 ha. On average, cattle consumed 17.94 L/ head per day while grazing. Peak monthly water use corresponded with average ambient temperature peak during the summer months.

Conclusions and Applications

Integrated grazing systems reduce the inputs required for cattle to reach a slaughter endpoint. They also may improve soil health. All of these practices result in more water availability for surrounding municipalities and allow for a thriving local economy.

观点与评论:美国南部平原和奥加拉拉含水层农田转为肉牛综合放牧和用水的影响
目的通过耕作方式和牛的需求,量化农田转为综合牧场后的节水量,量化雷霆农场与附近城市 20 年间的估计节水量,并评估牛在背景饲养和饲养场阶段的取水量。2018 年,Thunderstruck 农场将其所有灌溉土地划入水源保护区 (WCA),以保护水资源,种植的所有作物均用于青贮、干草或牧草,以支持该地区的乳制品和饲料厂企业。对雷霆农场从 2013 年到 2022 年的历史用水量和氮用量进行了评估。轻型肉牛(181-272 千克)在这些灌溉草场上放牧(约 120 天)。在放牧季节结束后,牛群在 Hy-Plains Feedyard(肯萨斯州蒙特祖马)完成屠宰。综述雷霆农场每年分配 229 亿升水用于牲畜用水和灌溉。Thunderstruck 农场的用水量比分配水量少 508 亿升,其中 57.8%的节水发生在 WCA 的 5 年期间。自加入 WCA 以来,平均施氮量每年减少 39%。同期,雷霆农场生产了 280 万公斤总增重的牛肉;随后,肉牛被转移到 Hy-Plains Feedyard 完成屠宰。根据这项研究的计算,在 4 年的时间里,通过减少放牧牛群对商品资源的使用,平均每年每 4047 公顷可节约 11 亿升水。牛在放牧期间平均每天消耗 17.94 升/头。结论与应用综合放牧系统减少了牛达到屠宰终点所需的投入。它们还可以改善土壤健康。所有这些做法都为周边城市提供了更多的水源,促进了当地经济的繁荣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Animal Science
Applied Animal Science AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信