Effects of short-term nutritional increase before artificial insemination on average daily gain and reproductive efficiency in March-calving beef heifer development systems

IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
L.F. Tadich , R.E.S. Rogers , R.N. Funston
{"title":"Effects of short-term nutritional increase before artificial insemination on average daily gain and reproductive efficiency in March-calving beef heifer development systems","authors":"L.F. Tadich ,&nbsp;R.E.S. Rogers ,&nbsp;R.N. Funston","doi":"10.15232/aas.2023-02399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Our objective was to evaluate increased nu- tritional energy before AI on BW, ADG, and reproductive efficiency in heifers developed on range or in a drylot.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>A 3-yr study used Angus crossbred heifers (n = 100/yr) near North Platte, Nebras- ka. Heifers were stratified by BW and assigned to 1 of 3 treatments. During winter development (131 ± 3.5 d/yr), heifers grazed upland range (RANGE) or were fed a drylot diet in 2 pens with a targeted gain of 0.68 kg/d to achieve 65% of mature BW (6.35 kg/head per day hay, 2.27 kg/ head per day wet corn gluten feed, and 0.34 kg/head per day supplement). Thirty-three days before AI, one dry- lot group remained on this diet (DLLO) while the other (DLHI) received an additional 4.08 kg/head per day wet corn gluten feed. Heifers developed on RANGE received 0.45 kg/head per day of a 29% CP, dried distillers grain– based pellet until 38 d before AI, when they were fed the DLLO diet.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>Prebreeding BW was great- er for DLHI (375 ± 3.4 kg) and DLLO (363 ± 3.4 kg) compared with RANGE (312 ± 3.4 kg), but breeding ADG was greater for RANGE (0.69 ± 0.01 kg) compared with DLHI (0.35 ± 0.02 kg) and DLLO (0.37 ± 0.02 kg). Pregnancy rates to AI were similar among DLHI (69%), DLLO (63%), and RANGE (49%); final pregnancy rates tended to be different: DLHI (96%), DLLO (95%) and RANGE (84%). Calving rate and calving in the first 21 d was similar.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>Greater nutrient and energy intake for DLHI and DLLO led to greater BW and ADG compared with RANGE, but short-term nutri- tional increase had no effect on pregnancy rate to AI nor final pregnancy rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000260/pdf?md5=66698a5d08bd784398b8a208e0eeb378&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286524000260-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Our objective was to evaluate increased nu- tritional energy before AI on BW, ADG, and reproductive efficiency in heifers developed on range or in a drylot.

Materials and Methods

A 3-yr study used Angus crossbred heifers (n = 100/yr) near North Platte, Nebras- ka. Heifers were stratified by BW and assigned to 1 of 3 treatments. During winter development (131 ± 3.5 d/yr), heifers grazed upland range (RANGE) or were fed a drylot diet in 2 pens with a targeted gain of 0.68 kg/d to achieve 65% of mature BW (6.35 kg/head per day hay, 2.27 kg/ head per day wet corn gluten feed, and 0.34 kg/head per day supplement). Thirty-three days before AI, one dry- lot group remained on this diet (DLLO) while the other (DLHI) received an additional 4.08 kg/head per day wet corn gluten feed. Heifers developed on RANGE received 0.45 kg/head per day of a 29% CP, dried distillers grain– based pellet until 38 d before AI, when they were fed the DLLO diet.

Results and Discussion

Prebreeding BW was great- er for DLHI (375 ± 3.4 kg) and DLLO (363 ± 3.4 kg) compared with RANGE (312 ± 3.4 kg), but breeding ADG was greater for RANGE (0.69 ± 0.01 kg) compared with DLHI (0.35 ± 0.02 kg) and DLLO (0.37 ± 0.02 kg). Pregnancy rates to AI were similar among DLHI (69%), DLLO (63%), and RANGE (49%); final pregnancy rates tended to be different: DLHI (96%), DLLO (95%) and RANGE (84%). Calving rate and calving in the first 21 d was similar.

Implications and Applications

Greater nutrient and energy intake for DLHI and DLLO led to greater BW and ADG compared with RANGE, but short-term nutri- tional increase had no effect on pregnancy rate to AI nor final pregnancy rates.

人工授精前短期增加营养对三月产犊肉用小母牛发育系统平均日增重和繁殖效率的影响
目标我们的目标是评估在人工授精前增加过渡能量对在牧场或干牧场培育的小母牛的体重、ADG 和繁殖效率的影响。材料和方法一项为期 3 年的研究使用了内布拉斯加州北普拉特附近的安格斯杂交小母牛(n = 100 头/年)。母牛按体重分层,并分配到 3 种处理中的 1 种。在冬季生长发育期间(131 ± 3.5 d/年),小母牛在高地牧场(RANGE)放牧,或在 2 个栏中饲喂干饲料,目标增重为 0.68 kg/d,以达到成熟体重的 65%(干草 6.35 kg/头/天,湿玉米麸质饲料 2.27 kg/头/天,补充饲料 0.34 kg/头/天)。在人工授精前 33 天,一个干批组(DLLO)仍使用这种日粮,而另一个干批组(DLHI)则每天额外添加 4.08 千克/头的湿玉米麸质饲料。在 RANGE 上发育的小母牛每天每头摄入 0.45 千克 CP 含量为 29% 的干蒸馏谷物颗粒饲料,直到人工授精前 38 天才开始饲喂 DLLO 日粮。4 kg)和 DLLO(363 ± 3.4 kg)比 RANGE(312 ± 3.4 kg)高,但 RANGE 的育成 ADG(0.69 ± 0.01 kg)比 DLHI(0.35 ± 0.02 kg)和 DLLO(0.37 ± 0.02 kg)高。DLHI(69%)、DLLO(63%)和 RANGE(49%)的人工授精妊娠率相似,但最终妊娠率往往不同:DLHI(96%)、DLLO(95%)和 RANGE(84%)。意义和应用与 RANGE 相比,DLHI 和 DLLO 的营养和能量摄入量更高,体重和 ADG 也更大,但短期营养的增加对人工授精妊娠率和最终妊娠率没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Animal Science
Applied Animal Science AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信