Effects of short-term nutritional increase before artificial insemination on average daily gain and reproductive efficiency in March-calving beef heifer development systems
{"title":"Effects of short-term nutritional increase before artificial insemination on average daily gain and reproductive efficiency in March-calving beef heifer development systems","authors":"L.F. Tadich , R.E.S. Rogers , R.N. Funston","doi":"10.15232/aas.2023-02399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Our objective was to evaluate increased nu- tritional energy before AI on BW, ADG, and reproductive efficiency in heifers developed on range or in a drylot.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>A 3-yr study used Angus crossbred heifers (n = 100/yr) near North Platte, Nebras- ka. Heifers were stratified by BW and assigned to 1 of 3 treatments. During winter development (131 ± 3.5 d/yr), heifers grazed upland range (RANGE) or were fed a drylot diet in 2 pens with a targeted gain of 0.68 kg/d to achieve 65% of mature BW (6.35 kg/head per day hay, 2.27 kg/ head per day wet corn gluten feed, and 0.34 kg/head per day supplement). Thirty-three days before AI, one dry- lot group remained on this diet (DLLO) while the other (DLHI) received an additional 4.08 kg/head per day wet corn gluten feed. Heifers developed on RANGE received 0.45 kg/head per day of a 29% CP, dried distillers grain– based pellet until 38 d before AI, when they were fed the DLLO diet.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>Prebreeding BW was great- er for DLHI (375 ± 3.4 kg) and DLLO (363 ± 3.4 kg) compared with RANGE (312 ± 3.4 kg), but breeding ADG was greater for RANGE (0.69 ± 0.01 kg) compared with DLHI (0.35 ± 0.02 kg) and DLLO (0.37 ± 0.02 kg). Pregnancy rates to AI were similar among DLHI (69%), DLLO (63%), and RANGE (49%); final pregnancy rates tended to be different: DLHI (96%), DLLO (95%) and RANGE (84%). Calving rate and calving in the first 21 d was similar.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>Greater nutrient and energy intake for DLHI and DLLO led to greater BW and ADG compared with RANGE, but short-term nutri- tional increase had no effect on pregnancy rate to AI nor final pregnancy rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000260/pdf?md5=66698a5d08bd784398b8a208e0eeb378&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286524000260-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Our objective was to evaluate increased nu- tritional energy before AI on BW, ADG, and reproductive efficiency in heifers developed on range or in a drylot.
Materials and Methods
A 3-yr study used Angus crossbred heifers (n = 100/yr) near North Platte, Nebras- ka. Heifers were stratified by BW and assigned to 1 of 3 treatments. During winter development (131 ± 3.5 d/yr), heifers grazed upland range (RANGE) or were fed a drylot diet in 2 pens with a targeted gain of 0.68 kg/d to achieve 65% of mature BW (6.35 kg/head per day hay, 2.27 kg/ head per day wet corn gluten feed, and 0.34 kg/head per day supplement). Thirty-three days before AI, one dry- lot group remained on this diet (DLLO) while the other (DLHI) received an additional 4.08 kg/head per day wet corn gluten feed. Heifers developed on RANGE received 0.45 kg/head per day of a 29% CP, dried distillers grain– based pellet until 38 d before AI, when they were fed the DLLO diet.
Results and Discussion
Prebreeding BW was great- er for DLHI (375 ± 3.4 kg) and DLLO (363 ± 3.4 kg) compared with RANGE (312 ± 3.4 kg), but breeding ADG was greater for RANGE (0.69 ± 0.01 kg) compared with DLHI (0.35 ± 0.02 kg) and DLLO (0.37 ± 0.02 kg). Pregnancy rates to AI were similar among DLHI (69%), DLLO (63%), and RANGE (49%); final pregnancy rates tended to be different: DLHI (96%), DLLO (95%) and RANGE (84%). Calving rate and calving in the first 21 d was similar.
Implications and Applications
Greater nutrient and energy intake for DLHI and DLLO led to greater BW and ADG compared with RANGE, but short-term nutri- tional increase had no effect on pregnancy rate to AI nor final pregnancy rates.