Hurricane season hindsight 2020: Applying the IDEA model toward local tropical cyclone forecasts.

Q3 Medicine
Robert Eicher
{"title":"Hurricane season hindsight 2020: Applying the IDEA model toward local tropical cyclone forecasts.","authors":"Robert Eicher","doi":"10.5055/jem.0817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hurricane Laura began as a disorganized tropical depression in August 2020. Early forecast guidance showed that the tropical cyclone could either completely dissipate or strengthen to a major hurricane as it approached the United States Gulf Coast. While this uncertainty was known by meteorologists, it was not necessarily communicated to the public in a direct manner. As it turned out, the worst-case scenario was the correct one. The tropical depression rapidly intensified and made landfall near Cameron, Louisiana, with sustained winds of 150 mph, making Laura a Category 4 hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson scale. Laura's rapid intensification caught some people off guard. Ideally, weather forecasts would have begun warning Louisiana residents to prepare for the possibility of a devastating hurricane in the early stages of tropical cyclone development. No one is suggesting that meteorologists did anything wrong. However, with the benefit of hindsight and decades of scholarly research in risk communication, we can speculate how an ideal forecast would have been written. This paper demonstrates that there are some simple considerations that could be made that might better alert the public to future hurricane worst-case scenarios, even in uncertain situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":38336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"33-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hurricane Laura began as a disorganized tropical depression in August 2020. Early forecast guidance showed that the tropical cyclone could either completely dissipate or strengthen to a major hurricane as it approached the United States Gulf Coast. While this uncertainty was known by meteorologists, it was not necessarily communicated to the public in a direct manner. As it turned out, the worst-case scenario was the correct one. The tropical depression rapidly intensified and made landfall near Cameron, Louisiana, with sustained winds of 150 mph, making Laura a Category 4 hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson scale. Laura's rapid intensification caught some people off guard. Ideally, weather forecasts would have begun warning Louisiana residents to prepare for the possibility of a devastating hurricane in the early stages of tropical cyclone development. No one is suggesting that meteorologists did anything wrong. However, with the benefit of hindsight and decades of scholarly research in risk communication, we can speculate how an ideal forecast would have been written. This paper demonstrates that there are some simple considerations that could be made that might better alert the public to future hurricane worst-case scenarios, even in uncertain situations.

2020 年飓风季节后见之明:将 IDEA 模型应用于当地热带气旋预报。
飓风劳拉在 2020 年 8 月开始时是一个杂乱无章的热带低气压。早期的预测指导显示,热带气旋在接近美国墨西哥湾沿岸时,要么完全消散,要么增强为大飓风。虽然气象学家知道这种不确定性,但并不一定以直接的方式告知公众。结果,最坏的情况是正确的。热带低压迅速增强,并以每小时 150 英里的持续风速在路易斯安那州卡梅伦附近登陆,使劳拉成为萨菲尔-辛普森级的四级飓风。劳拉的迅速加强让一些人措手不及。理想情况下,天气预报会在热带气旋发展的早期阶段就开始警告路易斯安那州居民做好准备,应对可能出现的破坏性飓风。没有人说气象学家做错了什么。然而,凭借事后的洞察力和数十年来对风险交流的学术研究,我们可以推测出理想的预报应该如何撰写。本文表明,即使在不确定的情况下,也可以通过一些简单的考虑,更好地提醒公众注意未来飓风的最坏情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Management
Journal of Emergency Management Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信