{"title":"Safety of early antiplatelet therapy for non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia.","authors":"Dongjuan Xu, Huan Zhou, Mengmeng Hu, Yilei Shen, Hongfei Li, Lianyan Wei, Jing Xu, Zhuangzhuang Jiang, Xiaoli Shao, Zhenhua Xi, Songbin He, Min Lou, Shaofa Ke","doi":"10.3724/zdxbyxb-2023-0423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the safety of early antiplatelet therapy for non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of acute ischemic stroke patients with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤3 and a platelet count <100×10<sup>9</sup>/L were obtained from a multicenter register. Those who required anticoagulation or had other contraindications to antiplatelet therapy were excluded. Short-term safety outcomes were in-hospital bleeding events, while the long-term safety outcome was a 1-year all-cause death. The short-term neurological outcomes were evaluated by modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1868 non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia were enrolled. Multivariate regression analyses showed that mono-antiplatelet therapy significantly increased the proportion of mRS score of 0-1 at discharge (<i>OR</i>=1.657, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.253-2.192, <i>P</i><0.01) and did not increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (<i>OR</i>=2.359, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.301-18.503, <i>P</i>>0.05), compared with those without antiplatelet therapy. However, dual-antiplatelet therapy did not bring more neurological benefits (<i>OR</i>=0.923, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.690-1.234, <i>P</i>>0.05), but increased the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (<i>OR</i>=2.837, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.311-6.136, <i>P</i><0.01) compared with those with mono-antiplatelet therapy. For patients with platelet counts ≤75×10<sup>9</sup>/L and >90×10<sup>9</sup>/L, antiplatelet therapy significantly improved neurological functional outcomes (both <i>P</i><0.05). For those with platelet counts (>75-90)×10<sup>9</sup>/L, antiplatelet therapy resulted in a significant improvement of 1-year survival (<i>P</i><0.05). For patients even with concurrent coagulation abnormalities, mono-antiplatelet therapy did not increase the risk of various types of bleeding (all <i>P</i>>0.05) but improved neurological functional outcomes (all <i>P</i><0.01). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of bleeding events, 1-year all-cause mortality risk, and neurological functional outcomes between aspirin and clopidogrel (all <i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia, antiplatelet therapy remains a reasonable choice. Mono-antiplatelet therapy has the same efficiency as dual-antiplatelet therapy in neurological outcome improvement with lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":24007,"journal":{"name":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057994/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/zdxbyxb-2023-0423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the safety of early antiplatelet therapy for non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia.
Methods: Data of acute ischemic stroke patients with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤3 and a platelet count <100×109/L were obtained from a multicenter register. Those who required anticoagulation or had other contraindications to antiplatelet therapy were excluded. Short-term safety outcomes were in-hospital bleeding events, while the long-term safety outcome was a 1-year all-cause death. The short-term neurological outcomes were evaluated by modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at discharge.
Results: A total of 1868 non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia were enrolled. Multivariate regression analyses showed that mono-antiplatelet therapy significantly increased the proportion of mRS score of 0-1 at discharge (OR=1.657, 95%CI: 1.253-2.192, P<0.01) and did not increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (OR=2.359, 95%CI: 0.301-18.503, P>0.05), compared with those without antiplatelet therapy. However, dual-antiplatelet therapy did not bring more neurological benefits (OR=0.923, 95%CI: 0.690-1.234, P>0.05), but increased the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (OR=2.837, 95%CI: 1.311-6.136, P<0.01) compared with those with mono-antiplatelet therapy. For patients with platelet counts ≤75×109/L and >90×109/L, antiplatelet therapy significantly improved neurological functional outcomes (both P<0.05). For those with platelet counts (>75-90)×109/L, antiplatelet therapy resulted in a significant improvement of 1-year survival (P<0.05). For patients even with concurrent coagulation abnormalities, mono-antiplatelet therapy did not increase the risk of various types of bleeding (all P>0.05) but improved neurological functional outcomes (all P<0.01). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of bleeding events, 1-year all-cause mortality risk, and neurological functional outcomes between aspirin and clopidogrel (all P>0.05).
Conclusions: For non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia, antiplatelet therapy remains a reasonable choice. Mono-antiplatelet therapy has the same efficiency as dual-antiplatelet therapy in neurological outcome improvement with lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.