Safety of early antiplatelet therapy for non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia.

Q2 Medicine
Dongjuan Xu, Huan Zhou, Mengmeng Hu, Yilei Shen, Hongfei Li, Lianyan Wei, Jing Xu, Zhuangzhuang Jiang, Xiaoli Shao, Zhenhua Xi, Songbin He, Min Lou, Shaofa Ke
{"title":"Safety of early antiplatelet therapy for non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia.","authors":"Dongjuan Xu, Huan Zhou, Mengmeng Hu, Yilei Shen, Hongfei Li, Lianyan Wei, Jing Xu, Zhuangzhuang Jiang, Xiaoli Shao, Zhenhua Xi, Songbin He, Min Lou, Shaofa Ke","doi":"10.3724/zdxbyxb-2023-0423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the safety of early antiplatelet therapy for non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of acute ischemic stroke patients with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤3 and a platelet count <100×10<sup>9</sup>/L were obtained from a multicenter register. Those who required anticoagulation or had other contraindications to antiplatelet therapy were excluded. Short-term safety outcomes were in-hospital bleeding events, while the long-term safety outcome was a 1-year all-cause death. The short-term neurological outcomes were evaluated by modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1868 non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia were enrolled. Multivariate regression analyses showed that mono-antiplatelet therapy significantly increased the proportion of mRS score of 0-1 at discharge (<i>OR</i>=1.657, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.253-2.192, <i>P</i><0.01) and did not increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (<i>OR</i>=2.359, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.301-18.503, <i>P</i>>0.05), compared with those without antiplatelet therapy. However, dual-antiplatelet therapy did not bring more neurological benefits (<i>OR</i>=0.923, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.690-1.234, <i>P</i>>0.05), but increased the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (<i>OR</i>=2.837, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.311-6.136, <i>P</i><0.01) compared with those with mono-antiplatelet therapy. For patients with platelet counts ≤75×10<sup>9</sup>/L and >90×10<sup>9</sup>/L, antiplatelet therapy significantly improved neurological functional outcomes (both <i>P</i><0.05). For those with platelet counts (>75-90)×10<sup>9</sup>/L, antiplatelet therapy resulted in a significant improvement of 1-year survival (<i>P</i><0.05). For patients even with concurrent coagulation abnormalities, mono-antiplatelet therapy did not increase the risk of various types of bleeding (all <i>P</i>>0.05) but improved neurological functional outcomes (all <i>P</i><0.01). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of bleeding events, 1-year all-cause mortality risk, and neurological functional outcomes between aspirin and clopidogrel (all <i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia, antiplatelet therapy remains a reasonable choice. Mono-antiplatelet therapy has the same efficiency as dual-antiplatelet therapy in neurological outcome improvement with lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":24007,"journal":{"name":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057994/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/zdxbyxb-2023-0423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the safety of early antiplatelet therapy for non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia.

Methods: Data of acute ischemic stroke patients with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤3 and a platelet count <100×109/L were obtained from a multicenter register. Those who required anticoagulation or had other contraindications to antiplatelet therapy were excluded. Short-term safety outcomes were in-hospital bleeding events, while the long-term safety outcome was a 1-year all-cause death. The short-term neurological outcomes were evaluated by modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at discharge.

Results: A total of 1868 non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia were enrolled. Multivariate regression analyses showed that mono-antiplatelet therapy significantly increased the proportion of mRS score of 0-1 at discharge (OR=1.657, 95%CI: 1.253-2.192, P<0.01) and did not increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (OR=2.359, 95%CI: 0.301-18.503, P>0.05), compared with those without antiplatelet therapy. However, dual-antiplatelet therapy did not bring more neurological benefits (OR=0.923, 95%CI: 0.690-1.234, P>0.05), but increased the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (OR=2.837, 95%CI: 1.311-6.136, P<0.01) compared with those with mono-antiplatelet therapy. For patients with platelet counts ≤75×109/L and >90×109/L, antiplatelet therapy significantly improved neurological functional outcomes (both P<0.05). For those with platelet counts (>75-90)×109/L, antiplatelet therapy resulted in a significant improvement of 1-year survival (P<0.05). For patients even with concurrent coagulation abnormalities, mono-antiplatelet therapy did not increase the risk of various types of bleeding (all P>0.05) but improved neurological functional outcomes (all P<0.01). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of bleeding events, 1-year all-cause mortality risk, and neurological functional outcomes between aspirin and clopidogrel (all P>0.05).

Conclusions: For non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia, antiplatelet therapy remains a reasonable choice. Mono-antiplatelet therapy has the same efficiency as dual-antiplatelet therapy in neurological outcome improvement with lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

对血小板减少的非心栓性轻度脑卒中患者进行早期抗血小板治疗的安全性。
目的研究血小板减少的非心栓性轻度脑卒中患者早期抗血小板治疗的安全性:方法:从多中心登记册中获取基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分≤3分且血小板计数为9/L的急性缺血性卒中患者的数据。需要抗凝或有其他抗血小板治疗禁忌症的患者被排除在外。短期安全性结果为院内出血事件,长期安全性结果为1年内全因死亡。短期神经功能结果由出院时的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分来评估:本研究共纳入了1868名血小板减少的非心栓性轻度脑卒中患者。多变量回归分析显示,与未接受抗血小板治疗的患者相比,单抗血小板治疗显著增加了出院时 mRS 为 0-1 的比例(OR=1.657,95%CI:1.253-2.192,POR=2.359,95%CI:0.301-18.503,P>0.05)。然而,双重抗血小板治疗并没有带来更多的神经系统获益(OR=0.923,95%CI:0.690-1.234,P>0.05),却增加了胃肠道出血的风险(OR=2.837,95%CI:1.311-6.136、P9/L和>90×109/L,抗血小板治疗可显著改善神经功能预后(P75-90)×109/L,抗血小板治疗可显著改善1年生存率(PP>0.05),改善神经功能预后(PP均>0.05):结论:对于血小板减少的非心栓性轻度卒中患者,抗血小板治疗仍然是合理的。结论:对于血小板减少的非心源性轻度卒中患者,抗血小板治疗仍然是合理的,单抗血小板治疗与双抗血小板治疗在改善神经功能预后方面具有相同的效率,且胃肠道出血风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信