Comparison of red and green light for treating non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in rats using singlet oxygen-cleavable prodrugs with PPIX-PDT.

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Photochemistry and Photobiology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1111/php.13933
Kazi Md Mahabubur Rahman, Soniya Kumbham, Ganesh Bist, Sukyung Woo, Barbara A Foster, Youngjae You
{"title":"Comparison of red and green light for treating non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in rats using singlet oxygen-cleavable prodrugs with PPIX-PDT.","authors":"Kazi Md Mahabubur Rahman, Soniya Kumbham, Ganesh Bist, Sukyung Woo, Barbara A Foster, Youngjae You","doi":"10.1111/php.13933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been 30 years since Photofrin-PDT was approved for the treatment of bladder cancer in Canada. However, Photofrin-PDT failed to gain popularity due to bladder complications. The PDT with red light and IV-administered Photofrin could permanently damage the bladder muscle. We have been developing a new combination strategy of PpIX-PDT with singlet oxygen-cleavable prodrugs for NMIBC with minimal side effects, avoiding damage to the bladder muscle layer. PpIX can be excited by either green (532 nm) or red (635 nm) light. Red light could be more efficacious in vivo due to its deeper tissue penetration than green light. Since HAL preferentially produces PpIX in tumors, we hypothesized that illuminating PpIX with red light might spare the muscle layer. PpIX-PDT was used to compare green and red laser efficacy in vitro and in vivo. The IC<sub>50</sub> of in vitro PpIX-PDT was 18 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> with the red laser and 22 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> with the green laser. The in vivo efficacy of the red laser with 50, 75, and 100 mW total dose was similar to the same dose of green laser in reducing tumor volume. Combining PpIX-PDT with prodrugs methyl-linked mitomycin C (Mt-L-MMC) and rhodamine-linked SN-38 (Rh-L-SN-38) significantly improved efficacy (tumor volume comparison). PpIX-PDT or PpIX-PDT + prodrug combination did not cause muscle damage in histological analysis. Overall, a combination of PpIX-PDT and prodrug with 635 nm laser is promising for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20133,"journal":{"name":"Photochemistry and Photobiology","volume":" ","pages":"1659-1675"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photochemistry and Photobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/php.13933","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has been 30 years since Photofrin-PDT was approved for the treatment of bladder cancer in Canada. However, Photofrin-PDT failed to gain popularity due to bladder complications. The PDT with red light and IV-administered Photofrin could permanently damage the bladder muscle. We have been developing a new combination strategy of PpIX-PDT with singlet oxygen-cleavable prodrugs for NMIBC with minimal side effects, avoiding damage to the bladder muscle layer. PpIX can be excited by either green (532 nm) or red (635 nm) light. Red light could be more efficacious in vivo due to its deeper tissue penetration than green light. Since HAL preferentially produces PpIX in tumors, we hypothesized that illuminating PpIX with red light might spare the muscle layer. PpIX-PDT was used to compare green and red laser efficacy in vitro and in vivo. The IC50 of in vitro PpIX-PDT was 18 mW/cm2 with the red laser and 22 mW/cm2 with the green laser. The in vivo efficacy of the red laser with 50, 75, and 100 mW total dose was similar to the same dose of green laser in reducing tumor volume. Combining PpIX-PDT with prodrugs methyl-linked mitomycin C (Mt-L-MMC) and rhodamine-linked SN-38 (Rh-L-SN-38) significantly improved efficacy (tumor volume comparison). PpIX-PDT or PpIX-PDT + prodrug combination did not cause muscle damage in histological analysis. Overall, a combination of PpIX-PDT and prodrug with 635 nm laser is promising for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer treatment.

Abstract Image

比较红光和绿光利用单线态氧可裂解原药和 PPIX-PDT 治疗大鼠非肌浸润性膀胱癌的效果。
加拿大批准 Photofrin-PDT 用于治疗膀胱癌已有 30 年之久。然而,由于膀胱并发症,Photofrin-PDT 未能普及。使用红光和静脉注射 Photofrin 的光动力疗法会对膀胱肌肉造成永久性损伤。我们一直在开发一种新的组合策略,即 PpIX-PDT 与单线态氧可裂解原药的组合,用于治疗 NMIBC,副作用极小,还能避免对膀胱肌层造成损伤。PpIX 可被绿光(532 纳米)或红光(635 纳米)激发。与绿光相比,红光的组织穿透力更强,因此在体内更有效。由于 HAL 会优先在肿瘤中产生 PpIX,我们假设用红光照射 PpIX 可能会使肌肉层幸免于难。我们用 PpIX-PDT 比较了绿光和红光激光在体外和体内的疗效。体外 PpIX-PDT 的 IC50 值为:红光 18 mW/cm2,绿光 22 mW/cm2。在减少肿瘤体积方面,总剂量为 50、75 和 100 mW 的红色激光与相同剂量的绿色激光的体内疗效相似。将 PpIX-PDT 与原药甲基联用丝裂霉素 C(Mt-L-MMC)和罗丹明联用 SN-38(Rh-L-SN-38)结合使用可显著提高疗效(肿瘤体积比较)。组织学分析显示,PpIX-PDT 或 PpIX-PDT + 原药组合不会造成肌肉损伤。总之,PpIX-PDT 和原药与 635 纳米激光的组合有望用于非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Photochemistry and Photobiology
Photochemistry and Photobiology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Photochemistry and Photobiology publishes original research articles and reviews on current topics in photoscience. Topics span from the primary interaction of light with molecules, cells, and tissue to the subsequent biological responses, representing disciplinary and interdisciplinary research in the fields of chemistry, physics, biology, and medicine. Photochemistry and Photobiology is the official journal of the American Society for Photobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信