Evaluation of the performance of a 7-T 8 × 2 transceiver array.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
NMR in Biomedicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1002/nbm.5146
Junghwan Kim, Changyu Sun, Chan Hong Moon, Hoby Hetherington, Jullie Pan
{"title":"Evaluation of the performance of a 7-T 8 × 2 transceiver array.","authors":"Junghwan Kim, Changyu Sun, Chan Hong Moon, Hoby Hetherington, Jullie Pan","doi":"10.1002/nbm.5146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The decoupled 8 × 2 transceiver array has been shown to achieve a mean B<sub>1</sub> <sup>+</sup> of 11.7 uT with a coefficient of variation of ~11% over the intracranial brain volume for 7-T MR imaging. However, this array may be thought to give lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and higher g-factors for parallel imaging compared with a radio frequency (RF) receive-only coil due to the latter's higher coil count and use of coil overlap to reduce the mutual impedance. Nonetheless, because the transceiver's highly decoupled design (pertinent for transmission) should also be constructive for reception, we measured the noise correlation, g-factors, and SNR for the decoupled transceiver in comparison with a commercial reference coil. We found that although the transceiver has half the number of receive elements in comparison with the reference coil (16 vs. 32), comparable g-factors and SNR over the head were obtained. From five subjects, the transceiver versus reference coil SNR was 65 ± 10 versus 67 ± 15. The mean noise correlation for all coil pairs was 10% ± 5% and 12% ± 9% (transceiver and reference coil, respectively). As changes in load impedance may alter the S parameters, we also examined the performance of the transceiver with tuned and matched (TM) versus untuned and unmatched (UTM) conditions on five subjects. We found that the noise correlation and SNR are robust to load variation; a noise correlation of 10% ± 5% and 10% ± 6% was determined with TM versus UTM conditions (SNR<sub>UTM</sub>/SNR<sub>TM</sub> = 0.97 ± 0.08). Finally, we demonstrate the performance of the array in human brain using T2-weighted turbo spin echo imaging, finding excellent SNR performance in both caudal and rostral brain regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19309,"journal":{"name":"NMR in Biomedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMR in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.5146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decoupled 8 × 2 transceiver array has been shown to achieve a mean B1 + of 11.7 uT with a coefficient of variation of ~11% over the intracranial brain volume for 7-T MR imaging. However, this array may be thought to give lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and higher g-factors for parallel imaging compared with a radio frequency (RF) receive-only coil due to the latter's higher coil count and use of coil overlap to reduce the mutual impedance. Nonetheless, because the transceiver's highly decoupled design (pertinent for transmission) should also be constructive for reception, we measured the noise correlation, g-factors, and SNR for the decoupled transceiver in comparison with a commercial reference coil. We found that although the transceiver has half the number of receive elements in comparison with the reference coil (16 vs. 32), comparable g-factors and SNR over the head were obtained. From five subjects, the transceiver versus reference coil SNR was 65 ± 10 versus 67 ± 15. The mean noise correlation for all coil pairs was 10% ± 5% and 12% ± 9% (transceiver and reference coil, respectively). As changes in load impedance may alter the S parameters, we also examined the performance of the transceiver with tuned and matched (TM) versus untuned and unmatched (UTM) conditions on five subjects. We found that the noise correlation and SNR are robust to load variation; a noise correlation of 10% ± 5% and 10% ± 6% was determined with TM versus UTM conditions (SNRUTM/SNRTM = 0.97 ± 0.08). Finally, we demonstrate the performance of the array in human brain using T2-weighted turbo spin echo imaging, finding excellent SNR performance in both caudal and rostral brain regions.

Abstract Image

评估 7-T 8 × 2 收发器阵列的性能。
在 7 T 磁共振成像中,解耦 8 × 2 收发器阵列可实现 11.7 uT 的平均 B1 +,颅内脑容量的变异系数约为 11%。不过,与射频(RF)接收线圈相比,这种阵列的信噪比(SNR)较低,并行成像的 g 因子较高,这是因为后者的线圈数量较多,并使用线圈重叠来减少相互阻抗。尽管如此,由于收发器的高度去耦设计(与传输相关)对接收也应具有建设性,因此我们测量了去耦收发器与商用参考线圈相比的噪声相关性、g 因子和信噪比。我们发现,虽然收发器的接收元件数量只有参考线圈的一半(16 个对 32 个),但其头部的 g 因子和信噪比却相当。在五个受试者中,收发器与参考线圈的信噪比分别为 65 ± 10 和 67 ± 15。所有线圈对的平均噪声相关性分别为 10% ± 5% 和 12% ± 9%(收发器和参考线圈)。由于负载阻抗的变化可能会改变 S 参数,我们还在五个受试者身上检测了收发器在调谐和匹配 (TM) 与非调谐和非匹配 (UTM) 条件下的性能。我们发现,噪声相关性和信噪比对负载变化很稳定;TM 与 UTM 条件下的噪声相关性分别为 10% ± 5% 和 10% ± 6%(SNRUTM/SNRTM = 0.97 ± 0.08)。最后,我们利用 T2 加权涡轮自旋回波成像技术展示了该阵列在人脑中的性能,发现其在尾部和喙部脑区都具有出色的信噪比性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NMR in Biomedicine
NMR in Biomedicine 医学-光谱学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
209
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: NMR in Biomedicine is a journal devoted to the publication of original full-length papers, rapid communications and review articles describing the development of magnetic resonance spectroscopy or imaging methods or their use to investigate physiological, biochemical, biophysical or medical problems. Topics for submitted papers should be in one of the following general categories: (a) development of methods and instrumentation for MR of biological systems; (b) studies of normal or diseased organs, tissues or cells; (c) diagnosis or treatment of disease. Reports may cover work on patients or healthy human subjects, in vivo animal experiments, studies of isolated organs or cultured cells, analysis of tissue extracts, NMR theory, experimental techniques, or instrumentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信