Improving CRISPR-Cas9 directed faithful transgene integration outcomes by reducing unwanted random DNA integration.

IF 9 2区 医学 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY
Rio Hermantara, Laura Richmond, Aqeel Faisal Taqi, Sabari Chilaka, Valentine Jeantet, Ileana Guerrini, Katherine West, Adam West
{"title":"Improving CRISPR-Cas9 directed faithful transgene integration outcomes by reducing unwanted random DNA integration.","authors":"Rio Hermantara, Laura Richmond, Aqeel Faisal Taqi, Sabari Chilaka, Valentine Jeantet, Ileana Guerrini, Katherine West, Adam West","doi":"10.1186/s12929-024-01020-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The field of genome editing has been revolutionized by the development of an easily programmable editing tool, the CRISPR-Cas9. Despite its promise, off-target activity of Cas9 posed a great disadvantage for genome editing purposes by causing DNA double strand breaks at off-target locations and causing unwanted editing outcomes. Furthermore, for gene integration applications, which introduce transgene sequences, integration of transgenes to off-target sites could be harmful, hard to detect, and reduce faithful genome editing efficiency.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Here we report the development of a multicolour fluorescence assay for studying CRISPR-Cas9-directed gene integration at an endogenous locus in human cell lines. We examine genetic integration of reporter genes in transiently transfected cells as well as puromycin-selected stable cell lines to determine the fidelity of multiple CRISPR-Cas9 strategies.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>We found that there is a high occurrence of unwanted DNA integration which tarnished faithful knock-in efficiency. Integration outcomes are influenced by the type of DNA DSBs, donor design, the use of enhanced specificity Cas9 variants, with S-phase regulated Cas9 activity. Moreover, restricting Cas9 expression with a self-cleaving system greatly improves knock-in outcomes by substantially reducing the percentage of cells with unwanted DNA integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results highlight the need for a more stringent assessment of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knock-in outcomes, and the importance of careful strategy design to maximise efficient and faithful transgene integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":15365,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Science","volume":"31 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10964699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-024-01020-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The field of genome editing has been revolutionized by the development of an easily programmable editing tool, the CRISPR-Cas9. Despite its promise, off-target activity of Cas9 posed a great disadvantage for genome editing purposes by causing DNA double strand breaks at off-target locations and causing unwanted editing outcomes. Furthermore, for gene integration applications, which introduce transgene sequences, integration of transgenes to off-target sites could be harmful, hard to detect, and reduce faithful genome editing efficiency.

Method: Here we report the development of a multicolour fluorescence assay for studying CRISPR-Cas9-directed gene integration at an endogenous locus in human cell lines. We examine genetic integration of reporter genes in transiently transfected cells as well as puromycin-selected stable cell lines to determine the fidelity of multiple CRISPR-Cas9 strategies.

Result: We found that there is a high occurrence of unwanted DNA integration which tarnished faithful knock-in efficiency. Integration outcomes are influenced by the type of DNA DSBs, donor design, the use of enhanced specificity Cas9 variants, with S-phase regulated Cas9 activity. Moreover, restricting Cas9 expression with a self-cleaving system greatly improves knock-in outcomes by substantially reducing the percentage of cells with unwanted DNA integration.

Conclusion: Our results highlight the need for a more stringent assessment of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knock-in outcomes, and the importance of careful strategy design to maximise efficient and faithful transgene integration.

通过减少不必要的随机 DNA 整合,改善 CRISPR-Cas9 定向忠实转基因整合结果。
背景:一种易于编程的编辑工具--CRISPR-Cas9--的开发给基因组编辑领域带来了革命性的变化。尽管Cas9前景广阔,但它的脱靶活性会在脱靶位置造成DNA双链断裂,导致不必要的编辑结果,从而对基因组编辑造成极大的不利影响。此外,对于引入转基因序列的基因整合应用,转基因整合到脱靶位点可能是有害的,难以检测,并降低忠实的基因组编辑效率:方法:我们在此报告了一种多色荧光检测方法的开发情况,该方法可用于研究人体细胞系中内源基因座的 CRISPR-Cas9 引导基因整合。我们研究了瞬时转染细胞和嘌呤霉素筛选的稳定细胞系中报告基因的基因整合,以确定多种CRISPR-Cas9策略的保真度:结果:我们发现,有很多不必要的DNA整合发生,这玷污了忠实的基因敲入效率。整合结果受DNA DSBs类型、供体设计、使用特异性增强的Cas9变体以及S期调控Cas9活性的影响。此外,利用自清除系统限制Cas9的表达,可大幅降低不需要的DNA整合细胞的比例,从而大大改善基因敲入结果:我们的研究结果凸显了对 CRISPR-Cas9 介导的基因敲入结果进行更严格评估的必要性,以及精心设计策略以最大限度地提高转基因整合的效率和忠实性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Science
Journal of Biomedical Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
18.50
自引率
0.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Science is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on fundamental and molecular aspects of basic medical sciences. It emphasizes molecular studies of biomedical problems and mechanisms. The National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), Taiwan supports the journal and covers the publication costs for accepted articles. The journal aims to provide an international platform for interdisciplinary discussions and contribute to the advancement of medicine. It benefits both readers and authors by accelerating the dissemination of research information and providing maximum access to scholarly communication. All articles published in the Journal of Biomedical Science are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CABI, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, EmBiology, and Global Health, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信