Effects of reduction in intraocular pressure after trabeculotomy on axial length and intraocular lens selection.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Satoru Kanda, Takashi Fujishiro, Ayako Karakawa, Suguru Nakagawa, Kiyoshi Ishii
{"title":"Effects of reduction in intraocular pressure after trabeculotomy on axial length and intraocular lens selection.","authors":"Satoru Kanda, Takashi Fujishiro, Ayako Karakawa, Suguru Nakagawa, Kiyoshi Ishii","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP) and axial length (AL) and to compare the refractive predicted error in patients who have undergone cataract surgery alone or in combination with trabeculotomy.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospital.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, retrospective, case-control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of patients who had undergone cataract surgery alone or in combination with trabeculotomy using the Tanito microhook were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into cataract surgery alone (CAT) or cataract surgery combined with trabeculotomy (LOT) groups. Demographic data, preoperative and postoperative IOP and AL, and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) were analyzed before and 1 month postoperatively to evaluate the interplay between IOP, AL, and refractive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>52 eyes (52 patients) underwent LOT, and 67 eyes (67 patients) underwent CAT. The mean IOP at baseline did not differ between the groups; the change in IOP (dIOP) was significantly higher in the LOT group than in the CAT group. The mean AL at baseline and the change in AL (dAL) were 24.0 ± 1.2 mm and 0.16 ± 0.11 mm, respectively, in the LOT group, and 23.8 ± 1.1 mm and 0.11 ± 0.070 mm, respectively, in the CAT group. The difference in dAL was also significant. In the LOT group, dIOP and dAL were significantly correlated. The mean SIA vectors did not significantly differ between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AL decreased because of the reduction in IOP after cataract surgery combined with trabeculotomy. Consequently, the refractive target error was greater, and the postoperative refractive outcome showed a tendency toward hyperopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"713-717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP) and axial length (AL) and to compare the refractive predicted error in patients who have undergone cataract surgery alone or in combination with trabeculotomy.

Setting: Hospital.

Design: Single-center, retrospective, case-control.

Methods: The medical records of patients who had undergone cataract surgery alone or in combination with trabeculotomy using the Tanito microhook were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into cataract surgery alone (CAT) or cataract surgery combined with trabeculotomy (LOT) groups. Demographic data, preoperative and postoperative IOP and AL, and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) were analyzed before and 1 month postoperatively to evaluate the interplay between IOP, AL, and refractive outcomes.

Results: 52 eyes (52 patients) underwent LOT, and 67 eyes (67 patients) underwent CAT. The mean IOP at baseline did not differ between the groups; the change in IOP (dIOP) was significantly higher in the LOT group than in the CAT group. The mean AL at baseline and the change in AL (dAL) were 24.0 ± 1.2 mm and 0.16 ± 0.11 mm, respectively, in the LOT group, and 23.8 ± 1.1 mm and 0.11 ± 0.070 mm, respectively, in the CAT group. The difference in dAL was also significant. In the LOT group, dIOP and dAL were significantly correlated. The mean SIA vectors did not significantly differ between the groups.

Conclusions: AL decreased because of the reduction in IOP after cataract surgery combined with trabeculotomy. Consequently, the refractive target error was greater, and the postoperative refractive outcome showed a tendency toward hyperopia.

小梁切开术后眼压降低对轴长和眼内透镜选择的影响
目的:研究眼内压(IOP)和轴向长度(AL)之间的关系,并比较单独接受白内障手术或结合小梁切开术的患者的屈光预测误差:医院:设计:单中心、回顾性、病例对照:方法:回顾性审查使用谷藤微钩单独或联合小梁切开术进行白内障手术的患者的病历。患者被分为单纯白内障手术组(CAT)和白内障手术联合小梁切开术组(LOT)。对患者的人口统计学数据、术前和术后眼压(IOP)和角膜屈光度(AL)以及手术引起的散光(SIA)进行了分析,以评估眼压(IOP)、角膜屈光度(AL)和屈光结果之间的相互作用v:52只眼睛(52名患者)接受了LOT手术,67只眼睛(67名患者)接受了CAT手术。两组基线时的平均眼压没有差异;LOT 组的眼压变化(dIOP)明显高于 CAT 组。LOT 组基线平均 AL 值和 AL 值变化(dAL)分别为 24.0±1.2 mm 和 0.16±0.11 mm,CAT 组分别为 23.8±1.1 mm 和 0.11±0.070 mm。dAL 的差异也很显著。在 LOT 组,dIOP 和 dAL 显著相关。各组的平均 SIA 向量没有明显差异:结论:白内障手术联合小梁切开术后,由于眼压降低,AL也随之降低。结论:白内障手术联合小梁切开术后,由于眼压降低,AL下降,因此屈光目标误差增大,术后屈光结果显示出远视趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信