Epidemiology and Prognostic Significance of Cough in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease.

IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Yet H Khor, Kerri A Johannson, Veronica Marcoux, Jolene H Fisher, Deborah Assayag, Helene Manganas, Nasreen Khalil, Martin Kolb, Christopher J Ryerson
{"title":"Epidemiology and Prognostic Significance of Cough in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease.","authors":"Yet H Khor, Kerri A Johannson, Veronica Marcoux, Jolene H Fisher, Deborah Assayag, Helene Manganas, Nasreen Khalil, Martin Kolb, Christopher J Ryerson","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202311-2101OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Cough is a key symptom in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). <b>Objectives:</b> This study evaluated the prevalence, longitudinal change, associations, and prognostic significance of cough severity in patients with fibrotic ILD. <b>Methods:</b> We included consecutive patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF fibrotic ILD who completed the 100-mm Cough Severity Visual Analog Scale from the prospective multicenter Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Baseline cough severity and associations with patient demographics and clinical factors were determined. Relationships between baseline cough severity and health outcomes were evaluated. <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> Patients with IPF (<i>n</i> = 1,061) had higher median baseline cough severity than those with non-IPF fibrotic ILD (<i>n</i> = 2,825) (24 vs. 20 mm; <i>P</i> < 0.001), with worse cough associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease for both cohorts. Worse cough severity was independently associated with worse health-related quality of life at baseline, larger annualized decline in Dl<sub>CO</sub>, development of disease progression, and reduced transplant-free survival in both IPF and non-IPF fibrotic ILD cohorts. The IPF cohort (2.2 mm; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-2.9 mm) had larger annualized increments in cough severity than the non-IPF fibrotic ILD cohort (1.1 mm; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-1.4 mm; <i>P</i> = 0.004). There was no difference in worsening cough over time comparing those receiving and not receiving ILD-targeted therapy or with and without lung function decline. <b>Conclusions:</b> Cough is common in patients with IPF and non-IPF fibrotic ILD, with increasing cough severity over time irrespective of ILD-targeted therapy. Patient-reported cough severity has prognostic implications on health-related quality of life, disease progression, and survival in fibrotic ILD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202311-2101OC","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Cough is a key symptom in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). Objectives: This study evaluated the prevalence, longitudinal change, associations, and prognostic significance of cough severity in patients with fibrotic ILD. Methods: We included consecutive patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF fibrotic ILD who completed the 100-mm Cough Severity Visual Analog Scale from the prospective multicenter Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Baseline cough severity and associations with patient demographics and clinical factors were determined. Relationships between baseline cough severity and health outcomes were evaluated. Measurements and Main Results: Patients with IPF (n = 1,061) had higher median baseline cough severity than those with non-IPF fibrotic ILD (n = 2,825) (24 vs. 20 mm; P < 0.001), with worse cough associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease for both cohorts. Worse cough severity was independently associated with worse health-related quality of life at baseline, larger annualized decline in DlCO, development of disease progression, and reduced transplant-free survival in both IPF and non-IPF fibrotic ILD cohorts. The IPF cohort (2.2 mm; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-2.9 mm) had larger annualized increments in cough severity than the non-IPF fibrotic ILD cohort (1.1 mm; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-1.4 mm; P = 0.004). There was no difference in worsening cough over time comparing those receiving and not receiving ILD-targeted therapy or with and without lung function decline. Conclusions: Cough is common in patients with IPF and non-IPF fibrotic ILD, with increasing cough severity over time irrespective of ILD-targeted therapy. Patient-reported cough severity has prognostic implications on health-related quality of life, disease progression, and survival in fibrotic ILD.

纤维化间质性肺病咳嗽的流行病学和预后意义
理由:咳嗽是纤维化间质性肺病(ILD)患者的主要症状:咳嗽是纤维化间质性肺病(ILD)患者的主要症状。研究目的本研究评估了纤维化间质性肺病患者咳嗽严重程度的患病率、纵向变化、关联性和预后意义。研究方法我们纳入了特发性肺纤维化(IPF)和非 IPF 纤维化 ILD 连续患者,这些患者完成了来自前瞻性多中心加拿大肺纤维化登记处的 100 毫米咳嗽严重程度视觉模拟量表(VAS)。研究确定了基线咳嗽严重程度以及与患者人口统计学和临床因素的关系。评估基线咳嗽严重程度与健康结果之间的关系。测量和主要结果:IPF患者(n=1061)的基线咳嗽严重程度中位数高于非IPF纤维化ILD患者(n=2825)[24 vs 20mm, pConclusion]:咳嗽在 IPF 和非 IPF 纤维化性 ILD 患者中很常见,随着时间的推移,咳嗽的严重程度会增加,与 ILD 靶向治疗无关。患者报告的咳嗽严重程度对纤维化性 ILD 患者的健康相关生活质量、疾病进展和生存具有预后影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
1313
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences. A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信