{"title":"The effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in treating pediatric sickle cell disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Najim Z. Alshahrani, Mohammed R. Algethami","doi":"10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) have just one recognized curative therapy option: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), which results in a long-lasting improvement in the clinical phenotype. Here, we assessed the effectiveness of HSCT in treating children with SCD by a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Up until January 2024, a comprehensive search was done using Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, PubMed/Medline, and Embase. Two reviewers worked separately to extract the data, and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment tool was used to assess the research's quality. The outcomes analyzed were Overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), graft failure (GF) and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nineteen papers satisfied our inclusion requirements and were assessed to be of fair quality. The pooled rate of OS was high (92%; 95% CI: 90.3%–93.5%). Similar finding was detected for EFS (85.8%; 95% CI: 83.7%–87.7%). In the other hand, pooled rates of GF and mortality were 6.9% (95% CI: 5.3%–8.9%) and 7.4% (95% CI: 5%–10.7%), respectively. A significant publication bias was detected for OS, EFS and GF outcomes. Subgroups analysis showed that study design was the major source of heterogeneity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results show that HSCT is effective and safe, with pooled survival rates above 90%. It is important to assess innovative tactics in light of the alarming GF and mortality rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49257,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal","volume":"32 5","pages":"Article 102049"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016424000999/pdfft?md5=948fb29cf0a8dcdee8655b43ab9b3546&pid=1-s2.0-S1319016424000999-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016424000999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) have just one recognized curative therapy option: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), which results in a long-lasting improvement in the clinical phenotype. Here, we assessed the effectiveness of HSCT in treating children with SCD by a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods
Up until January 2024, a comprehensive search was done using Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, PubMed/Medline, and Embase. Two reviewers worked separately to extract the data, and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment tool was used to assess the research's quality. The outcomes analyzed were Overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), graft failure (GF) and mortality.
Results
Nineteen papers satisfied our inclusion requirements and were assessed to be of fair quality. The pooled rate of OS was high (92%; 95% CI: 90.3%–93.5%). Similar finding was detected for EFS (85.8%; 95% CI: 83.7%–87.7%). In the other hand, pooled rates of GF and mortality were 6.9% (95% CI: 5.3%–8.9%) and 7.4% (95% CI: 5%–10.7%), respectively. A significant publication bias was detected for OS, EFS and GF outcomes. Subgroups analysis showed that study design was the major source of heterogeneity.
Conclusion
Our results show that HSCT is effective and safe, with pooled survival rates above 90%. It is important to assess innovative tactics in light of the alarming GF and mortality rates.
期刊介绍:
The Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal (SPJ) is the official journal of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society (SPS) publishing high quality clinically oriented submissions which encompass the various disciplines of pharmaceutical sciences and related subjects. SPJ publishes 8 issues per year by the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, with the cooperation of the College of Pharmacy, King Saud University.