The Correspondence Between Magnetic Resonance Images and the 
Clinical and Intraoperative Status of Patients with Spinal Tumors.

Grzegorz Guzik
{"title":"The Correspondence Between Magnetic Resonance Images and the \u2028Clinical and Intraoperative Status of Patients with Spinal Tumors.","authors":"Grzegorz Guzik","doi":"10.2174/1573405612666160128235556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract introduction: </strong>Surgical treatment of tumors, particularly metastases to the spine, has become increasingly common owing to the progress in anesthesiology and spinal surgery and greater detectability. The patients qualified for surgeries are those with mechanical pain, fracture or at risk of vertebral fracture or neurological complications. The basis for qualification for different types of surgeries is clinical and imaging examination, particularly MRI and CT. Qualification should always be multidisciplinary and requires understanding and knowledge of its most essential aspects. When carrying out imaging examinations, it is necessary to assess the size and the type of the tumor, taking into account of differential diagnosis. One should also consider the factors indicating spinal instability or the onset of neurological deficits. The criteria developed by Kostiuk-Weinstain and Taneichi are used for that purpose. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the correspondence between the most essential elements of clinical and MRI examination of the spine and the intraoperative status of patients with spinal tumors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We carried out prospective examination assessing the correspondence between the clinical status and MR images and the intraoperative spine. We introduced algorithm to describe the morphology of neoplastic lesions within the spine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The information obtained from the clinical examination and the intraoperative status of the spine corresponded with the MRI examination with the exception of the assessment of neoplastic infiltration to soft tissues, dura mater and nerve roots. It was also found that there are no clear-cut MRI features allowing differentiation of metastatic lesions from primary tumors and osteitis. Furthermore, MRI examination does not allow for the assessment of the quality of bone tissue in the vicinity of the tumor.</p>","PeriodicalId":517994,"journal":{"name":"Current medical imaging reviews","volume":"12 2","pages":"149-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5078596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current medical imaging reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405612666160128235556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract introduction: Surgical treatment of tumors, particularly metastases to the spine, has become increasingly common owing to the progress in anesthesiology and spinal surgery and greater detectability. The patients qualified for surgeries are those with mechanical pain, fracture or at risk of vertebral fracture or neurological complications. The basis for qualification for different types of surgeries is clinical and imaging examination, particularly MRI and CT. Qualification should always be multidisciplinary and requires understanding and knowledge of its most essential aspects. When carrying out imaging examinations, it is necessary to assess the size and the type of the tumor, taking into account of differential diagnosis. One should also consider the factors indicating spinal instability or the onset of neurological deficits. The criteria developed by Kostiuk-Weinstain and Taneichi are used for that purpose. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the correspondence between the most essential elements of clinical and MRI examination of the spine and the intraoperative status of patients with spinal tumors.

Materials and methods: We carried out prospective examination assessing the correspondence between the clinical status and MR images and the intraoperative spine. We introduced algorithm to describe the morphology of neoplastic lesions within the spine.

Results: The information obtained from the clinical examination and the intraoperative status of the spine corresponded with the MRI examination with the exception of the assessment of neoplastic infiltration to soft tissues, dura mater and nerve roots. It was also found that there are no clear-cut MRI features allowing differentiation of metastatic lesions from primary tumors and osteitis. Furthermore, MRI examination does not allow for the assessment of the quality of bone tissue in the vicinity of the tumor.

脊柱肿瘤患者的磁共振成像与临床和术中状况之间的对应关系。
摘要介绍:由于麻醉学和脊柱外科的进步以及可探测性的提高,肿瘤,尤其是脊柱转移瘤的手术治疗变得越来越普遍。符合手术条件的患者是那些有机械性疼痛、骨折或有椎体骨折或神经系统并发症风险的患者。不同类型手术的鉴定依据是临床和影像学检查,尤其是核磁共振成像和 CT。资格认证应始终是多学科的,并要求了解和掌握其最基本的方面。在进行影像学检查时,有必要评估肿瘤的大小和类型,并考虑到鉴别诊断。此外,还应考虑脊柱不稳或出现神经功能缺损的因素。为此,我们采用了 Kostiuk-Weinstain 和 Taneichi 制定的标准。本研究旨在评估脊柱临床和磁共振成像检查的最基本要素与脊柱肿瘤患者术中状况之间的对应关系:我们进行了前瞻性检查,评估临床状况和磁共振成像与术中脊柱状况之间的对应关系。我们引入了描述脊柱内肿瘤病变形态的算法:结果:临床检查和术中脊柱状况所获得的信息与核磁共振检查结果一致,但对软组织、硬脑膜和神经根肿瘤浸润的评估除外。研究还发现,核磁共振成像没有明确的特征,无法将转移性病灶与原发性肿瘤和骨炎区分开来。此外,磁共振成像检查无法评估肿瘤附近骨组织的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信