[Validation of screening method based on EEG analysis for the risk assessment of psychiatric and behavioral disorders: a pilot study].

Q3 Medicine
I V Kichuk, N V Solovieva, A A Keskinov, V S Yudin, K V Golanova, N A Chuprova, M N Rusalova, A K Tikhonov, S V Chausova, N B Nogai, A A Mitrofanov
{"title":"[Validation of screening method based on EEG analysis for the risk assessment of psychiatric and behavioral disorders: a pilot study].","authors":"I V Kichuk, N V Solovieva, A A Keskinov, V S Yudin, K V Golanova, N A Chuprova, M N Rusalova, A K Tikhonov, S V Chausova, N B Nogai, A A Mitrofanov","doi":"10.17116/jnevro202412403188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the validity of the screening method based on EEG analysis using predictive analytics algorithms with the calculation of linear discriminant functions (LDFs), in comparison with a classification system based on psychometric self-report scales.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A comparative cross-sectional study with partial blinding involving healthy volunteers was conducted at two investigational sites. The calculated scores of LDFs used to assess risks of impulsivity, depression and anxiety acted as quantitative characteristics of subjects' mental state. Testing included completing psychometric scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As a result of the performed validation of the original screening method based on EEG analysis in comparison with the scores of psychometric scales chosen as a reference method, satisfactory results were obtained with the best parameters of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting high levels of impulsivity associated with pronounced aggressiveness. Of considerable interest is also the direct correlation found between high levels of LDF impulsivity scores and high levels of self-rated aggression on a psychometric scale (BPAQ-24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results open up the possibility of using the proposed method to predict a number of emotional and behavioral characteristics of subjects, including a high risk of aggressive behavior as part of professional selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":56370,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal Nevrologii I Psikhiatrii Imeni S S Korsakova","volume":"124 3","pages":"88-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal Nevrologii I Psikhiatrii Imeni S S Korsakova","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202412403188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the validity of the screening method based on EEG analysis using predictive analytics algorithms with the calculation of linear discriminant functions (LDFs), in comparison with a classification system based on psychometric self-report scales.

Material and methods: A comparative cross-sectional study with partial blinding involving healthy volunteers was conducted at two investigational sites. The calculated scores of LDFs used to assess risks of impulsivity, depression and anxiety acted as quantitative characteristics of subjects' mental state. Testing included completing psychometric scales.

Results: As a result of the performed validation of the original screening method based on EEG analysis in comparison with the scores of psychometric scales chosen as a reference method, satisfactory results were obtained with the best parameters of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting high levels of impulsivity associated with pronounced aggressiveness. Of considerable interest is also the direct correlation found between high levels of LDF impulsivity scores and high levels of self-rated aggression on a psychometric scale (BPAQ-24).

Conclusion: The results open up the possibility of using the proposed method to predict a number of emotional and behavioral characteristics of subjects, including a high risk of aggressive behavior as part of professional selection.

[基于脑电图分析的精神和行为障碍风险评估筛查方法的验证:一项试点研究]。
目的通过计算线性判别函数(LDF),评估基于脑电图分析的筛查方法与基于心理测量自我报告量表的分类系统的有效性:在两个研究机构对健康志愿者进行了部分盲法横断面比较研究。用于评估冲动、抑郁和焦虑风险的 LDFs 计算得分是受试者精神状态的量化特征。测试包括完成心理测量量表:结果:通过对基于脑电图分析的原始筛查方法与被选为参考方法的心理测量量表得分进行比较验证,结果令人满意,在检测与明显攻击性相关的高水平冲动性方面,灵敏度、特异性和准确性参数均达到最佳水平。值得注意的是,在心理测量量表(BPAQ-24)上发现高水平的 LDF 冲动性得分与高水平的自评攻击性之间存在直接相关:结论:这些结果为使用所提出的方法预测受试者的一系列情绪和行为特征提供了可能性,包括作为专业选拔一部分的攻击性行为高风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Одно из старейших медицинских изданий России, основанное в 1901 году. Создание журнала связано с именами выдающихся деятелей отечественной медицины, вошедших в историю мировой психиатрии и неврологии, – С.С. Корсакова и А.Я. Кожевникова. Широкий диапазон предлагаемых журналом материалов и разнообразие форм их представления привлекают внимание научных работников и врачей, опытных и начинающих медиков, причем не только неврологов и психиатров, но и специалистов смежных областей медицины.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信