Analysis of 50 Most Cited Articles About Refractive Surgery From an Altmetric Perspective.

Q4 Medicine
Mustafa Berhuni, Ozer Zeynep Ozcan
{"title":"Analysis of 50 Most Cited Articles About Refractive Surgery From an Altmetric Perspective.","authors":"Mustafa Berhuni, Ozer Zeynep Ozcan","doi":"10.31348/2024/13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate an Altmetric analysis of the 50 most cited refractive surgery articles in Ophthalmology journals and to compare them with traditional metrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The term \"refractive surgery\" was searched, using a time filter between 2010-2020 in the Web of Science core collection database. The 50 most cited articles between 2010 and 2020 were recorded. Descriptive statistics were performed. The Spearman correlation test was used to evaluate the correlation between traditional metrics and Altmetrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Altmetric scores of the top 50 articles ranged from 0 to 25, and the median Altmetric score was 4. The citation numbers of the 50 articles ranged from 83 to 523, and the median citation number was 119.5. The most cited article topic was \"Toric Intraocular Lens\"; the topics with the highest Altmetric scores were \"Toric Intraocular Lens\" and \"Trifocal Intraocular Lens\". There was no significant correlation between Altmetric scores and number of citations. There was a weak correlation between Altmetric scores and the average citation per year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Altmetric score is insufficient, compared with traditional metrics, to show the scientific value of articles on refractive surgery. Altmetrics can be used to supplement traditional metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":39839,"journal":{"name":"Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie","volume":"80 Ahead of print","pages":"248-255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31348/2024/13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The purpose of this study is to evaluate an Altmetric analysis of the 50 most cited refractive surgery articles in Ophthalmology journals and to compare them with traditional metrics.

Methods: The term "refractive surgery" was searched, using a time filter between 2010-2020 in the Web of Science core collection database. The 50 most cited articles between 2010 and 2020 were recorded. Descriptive statistics were performed. The Spearman correlation test was used to evaluate the correlation between traditional metrics and Altmetrics.

Results: The Altmetric scores of the top 50 articles ranged from 0 to 25, and the median Altmetric score was 4. The citation numbers of the 50 articles ranged from 83 to 523, and the median citation number was 119.5. The most cited article topic was "Toric Intraocular Lens"; the topics with the highest Altmetric scores were "Toric Intraocular Lens" and "Trifocal Intraocular Lens". There was no significant correlation between Altmetric scores and number of citations. There was a weak correlation between Altmetric scores and the average citation per year.

Conclusion: The Altmetric score is insufficient, compared with traditional metrics, to show the scientific value of articles on refractive surgery. Altmetrics can be used to supplement traditional metrics.

从 Altmetric 角度分析有关屈光手术的 50 篇最常被引用的文章。
目的:本研究旨在评估 Altmetric 对眼科期刊中被引用次数最多的 50 篇屈光手术文章进行的分析,并将其与传统指标进行比较:方法:在Web of Science核心数据库中使用时间过滤器搜索 "屈光手术 "一词,时间范围为2010-2020年。记录了 2010-2020 年间被引用次数最多的 50 篇文章。进行了描述性统计。斯皮尔曼相关检验用于评估传统指标与 Altmetrics 之间的相关性:前 50 篇文章的 Altmetric 分数在 0 到 25 之间,中位数为 4;50 篇文章的引用次数在 83 到 523 之间,中位数为 119.5。被引用次数最多的文章主题是 "散光眼内透镜";Altmetric得分最高的主题是 "散光眼内透镜 "和 "三焦点眼内透镜"。Altmetric 分数与引用次数之间没有明显的相关性。结论:与传统指标相比,Altmetric 分数不足以显示屈光手术文章的科学价值。Altmetric可作为传统指标的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie
Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: - Redakce přijímá pouze práce vyhovující po odborné stránce, které jsou na odpovídající profesionální a formální úrovni. - Uveřejněná práce se stává majetkem časopisu, přetisknout její část nebo obrázek lze jen s citací původu. - Rukopis zasílejte v originále a dobře čitelné kopii (je nutná také kopie tabulek, legend, podle možnosti i obrázků). - Listy číslujte v pravém horním rohu a spojujte svorkou, nesešívejte. Přijímáme práce psané na jedné straně kvalitního bílého nelesklého papíru formátu A4 (neprůklepový) na psacím stroji nebo počítači s obvyklými typy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信